ScienceLogic vs vRealize Network Insight comparison

ScienceLogic and VMware are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. ScienceLogic is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.7, while VMware is ranked #41 with an average rating of 8.7. ScienceLogic holds a 1.8% mindshare in IM, compared to VMware’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of VMware users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

4,129 Views
2,188 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

vRealize Network Insight

Read 46 vRealize Network Insight reviews

1,784 Views
785 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

vRealize Network Insight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ScienceLogic and vRealize Network Insight compete in the network monitoring category. ScienceLogic has the upper hand in customization and extensive features, while vRealize Network Insight stands out for its user-friendly interface and visualization capabilities.

Features: ScienceLogic offers robust customization with granular permissions, multi-tenancy, and powerful integration capabilities. It provides a wide range of monitoring options and built-in automation for fault reduction. vRealize Network Insight is noted for its excellent visualization of network flows, ability to track virtual spaces, and user-friendly network monitoring interface.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users see areas for improvement in reporting, user interface, SNMP trap processing, and application monitoring. Documentation and API support are also noted as needing enhancement. vRealize Network Insight is suggested to improve by enhancing compatibility with third-party vendors, offering more granular micro-segmentation rules, and improving application visibility and configuration ease.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both ScienceLogic and vRealize Network Insight can be deployed on-premises, with ScienceLogic also supporting cloud environments. ScienceLogic's customer service is praised for being responsive and knowledgeable, often surpassing expectations. vRealize Network Insight provides excellent technical support, though improvements in customer interaction and technical expertise are suggested.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's tiered pricing is based on device number and tier, with costs rising with expanded capabilities. It is considered expensive but justified by features and ROI through proactive issue resolution. vRealize Network Insight is deemed suitable for larger enterprises and noted for high costs tied to VMware products. Both solutions are seen as costly yet valuable with a satisfactory ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. vRealize Network Insight Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. vRealize Network Insight

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

25th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

21st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (6th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (13th), IT Operations Analytics (7th), Cloud Monitoring Software (15th), AIOps (9th)

vRealize Network Insight

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

38th

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

41st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of vRealize Network Insight is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Offers comprehensive monitoring and tool consolidation but integration complexity needs improvement

There is room for improvement in the speed of setting up the service and integrating PowerPacks. Although these prebuilt features are great, there is considerable complexity in bringing them together to create a unified dashboard. Even with many good integrations and deep visibility, the implementation takes time, especially when it doesn't involve these integrations. While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise. It's challenging for new customers to implement independently. The implementation speed of non-PowerPack or non-out-of-the-box integrations should be improved. Additionally, the AI automation feature is not yet very rich due to resource constraints supporting a wide platform.

Read full review

NiteshKumar1

Principle consultant at Infosys

The tool's configuration is easy and artifacts are easily accessible through professional services and the web

The product is highly regarded, and many customers have been using it along with other VMware products like vSphere and VMware vCloud Usage Insight. However, recently, there's been a trend among customers, especially those using VMware for a considerable period, to explore the potential of migrating to the public cloud. The common concern among these customers is how the VMware products will perform in the public cloud environment. Migrating instances from VMware to different platforms is not easy, especially when dealing with many instances across multiple customers. Customers are keen to maintain the functionality of their existing VMware products but prefer to run them on the public cloud instead of on-premise servers. Our clients for vRealize Network Insight are enterprise businesses. I rate it a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Power packs."

"The best feature is the highly flexible graphs."

"Dynamic Component Mapping is key and unique."

"It is simple."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"The power flow is great."

"When it comes to features, the power pack is the most valuable."

"The flexibility to support most technologies. The way ScienceLogic gathers data from multiple sources is vital to our customers. As we work with new customers (often with different technology requirements), ScienceLogic is flexible enough to support our clients’ varying network needs."

More ScienceLogic pros

"With this product, we can precisely identify communication patterns between virtual machines within our data center, whether it's east-east or east-west communication."

"If we deploy NSX it shows us how the workflow will flow in the organization, what the roadblocks are, and what we need to do to overcome those hurdles. When we run this product, it gives us reports which describe problems with physical switches. We work with the network team to get them all resolved."

"What's valuable to us is the ability to get a view into the virtual space, which is something we haven't had before. Before, it was done by collecting from network endpoints and extrapolating into the virtual environment. Now it's coming directly from the virtual environment."

"The best feature of this application is its ability to capture everything within the same application, as well as capture all the traffic."

"It gives the visibility that was either broken or there in pieces only. This solution provides a unified view of the whole system, back and forth. It has helped to reduce time to value, increase performance, more easily manage networks, and provide deep visibility."

"The automation collects all the relationships between servers, allowing us to visualize these relationships and organize the migration into waves."

"compare-to-competition; I would recommend the product. I don't think there is any other product like this on the market right now."

"The most valuable feature for us is that insight into what our network is really doing - it's a fairly complex network. Not having to go through thousands of lines of network configuration to find firewall ports that were open or closed, for various ports, was very valuable. It went out and found everything we need very quickly."

More vRealize Network Insight pros

Cons

"If I were a small to medium business, I probably wouldn't choose this provider. It is a heavily configurable, heavyweight, and scalable IT solution for IT infrastructure monitoring."

"It was challenging onboarding users."

"I would like to see out-of-the-box standard dashboards for common services."

"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."

"There are often bugs in new releases."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

"The product must educate its strategic partners for deployment."

"From a performance perspective, it needs to improve a lot."

More ScienceLogic cons

"While it's not exactly a feature, what normally happens when we are trying to look at the VM flow portion is - although Network Insight does have options to integrate a few physical switches into it - we can't really get an end-to-end flow of the network. We might be using a few switches that are not supported by Network Insight. That is where they can improve, in the support for more physical switches and network devices."

"I would like to see more reporting features, more dashboards."

"The virtual appliance has rebooted."

"The IT infrastructure industry is expected to evolve towards a hybrid cloud model in the next five to ten years. In this model, most of the customer's resources reside on-premise within a private cloud setup, such as VMware. Another segment operates within public cloud environments like Azure and AWS, and a portion remains in traditional data centers. There should be seamless interoperability between public and private clouds. AWS and VMware need to work together to make it possible. Whether users interact with on-premise infrastructure or configure resources in the public cloud, the user experience must be seamless."

"I would like to see more interoperability on the firewall and low balancer sides."

"I'd like to see better support for being able to search the hardware NetFlow data. It ingests fairly well, but you can't tell, in a lot of cases, what source the data came from. I'd like to see more support for picking specific sources. That way you could really make a compelling use case. There are also some difficulties where it can't exactly trace the path between source and destination but if you hit the reverse flow on the same search it shows the entire path."

"The UI, even though once you get to know it, it's easier, still it's hard to figure out by yourself. You have to go read, watch videos. It has a lot of data on it. So that is an issue."

"I want to see more in terms of microsegmentation. As of now, I can see the rules, but they are not in a readable format that I can convert to microsegmentation and can fit into NSX Manager."

More vRealize Network Insight cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price could be lower, but for what you pay, you got a lot of value from its features and functionalities. Customers always want a discount or a cheaper solution."

"Plan for adding more to it. Once you see EM7 in action, you will want to keep adding systems to monitor."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

"The solution has reduced the time that we spend on other products. For example, with NSX, we were able to quickly find things that we would normally spend days trying to figure out."

"It has brought more money into our company."

"They should include the product in NSX because it's important to have it for deployment."

"I rate vRealize Network Insight's pricing a seven point five out of ten."

"Cost always has room for improvement, you could always make it cheaper. But I think it's a good value for what you pay for it."

"We have spent less time investigating network flows, so it is absolutely cost-effective."

"vRealize Network Insight is expensive."

"It's an expensive product because we have a lot of nodes."

More vRealize Network Insight pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is working towards a kind of AI, DKAIRA enablement, but I find one dependency is the frequent need to rely on professional services. If the knowledge for implementation could be spread...

See all answers

What do you like most about vRealize Network Insight?

The tool's ease of configuration and use and the availability of information and artifacts through professional services and the web are key factors that customers find valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for vRealize Network Insight?

Broadcom is known for increasing product prices, making them expensive compared to what people used to pay. I liken the subscription model to not truly owning what you pay for.

See all answers

What needs improvement with vRealize Network Insight?

Right now, I do not see a specific area for improvement. My main concern is understanding the intentions of Broadcom, which has acquired VMware. Broadcom should improve by going back to what was wo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 14% of the time

Zabbix vs ScienceLogic

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs ScienceLogic

Compared 10% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 7% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

ThousandEyes vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 13% of the time

DX NetOps vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 12% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 10% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 10% of the time

DX Spectrum vs vRealize Network Insight

Compared 9% of the time

More vRealize Network Insight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

June 2025

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

vRealize Network Insight

June 2025

Download vRealize Network Insight product report

Also Known As

No data available

Arkin

Overview

ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.

Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Agentless Configuration: Ensures easy deployment without the need for agents.
Third-Party Integration: Seamlessly integrates with various tools.
Dynamic Component Mapping: Offers real-time relationship and dependency mapping.
Flexible Graphs: Allows custom visual representation of data.
Role-Based Access: Provides tiered access for different user roles.
Infrastructure and Event Management: Efficiently monitors hybrid environments.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Scalability: Handles environments of all sizes efficiently.
AI and Machine Learning: Enhances automation and incident management.
Ease of Deployment: Streamlines initial setup and reduces time to value.
Customization: Custom dashboards and reports cater to specific needs.
Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent support services.

ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.

ScienceLogic

VMware vRealize Network Insight delivers intelligent operations for software-defined networking and security. It helps customers build an optimized, highly-available and secure network infrastructure across multi-cloud environments. It accelerates micro-segmentation planning and deployment, enables visibility across virtual and physical networks and provides operational views to manage and scale VMware NSX deployments.

VMware

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

NTTi3, VCIX-NV, VMware Networking and Security Business Unit, Illumio, CompuNet

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. vRealize Network Insight

July 2025

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. vRealize Network Insight

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. vRealize Network Insight and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. vRealize Network Insight report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.