Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics vs Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Cognitive Threat Anal...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
22nd
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palo Alto Networks URL Filt...
Ranking in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
17th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) category, the market share of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is 0.3% and it increased by 183.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB is 1.1% and it decreased by 61.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Philippe GNEZZERE - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 27, 2023
Simple deployment, reliable, and helpful support
Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is used for cloud security.  The most valuable feature of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is its reliability. Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics could improve by having quicker detection and response and web analysis. I have been using Cisco Cognitive Threat…
MV
Aug 12, 2021
Provides regular updates with an auto download option; prohibited URLs can be listed by category
Our company is based in Sacramento. This solution is generally used for enforcing HR policy for enterprise. In our case, most of the clients are state government institutions. Palo Alto ensures that no hate speech or anarchy websites, for example, get through. We also implement this product. If…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is its reliability."
"The tool blocks URLs."
"The most valuable feature is that the product can do everything in a single device, including the firewall, rules, and the PBL. It also has good routing and switching."
"Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB is easy to use, easy to operate, and easy to edit."
"It's allowed us to have better visibility and protection from threats."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Being able to manage blacklists and whitelists easily is very useful, especially for internal access and limiting outbound access."
"Prohibited URLs can be listed by category."
"The Palo Alto solution has improved our organization by providing threat protection across a variety of internet connections. Our company also gets valuable insights regarding threat analysis."
 

Cons

"Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics could improve by having quicker detection and response and web analysis."
"We have had some challenges with making Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB work with ELK stack."
"Support needs to be enhanced."
"Performance monitoring could use improvement."
"One way Palo Alto can improve is by offering sandboxing. I don't know if they currently offer a sandboxing feature together with the firewall or not. They should provide secure sandboxing with the firewalls."
"The solution is a bit expensive."
"For hosting sites like Blogspot, they host sites that should be in different categories, but get lumped together in general. There needs to be more granularity or multiple categorizations."
"An area for improvement would be the technical support, which can be slow."
"It is an expensive solution and not everyone has the budget for it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics could reduce the price to allow all countries to afford it. The price is expensive."
"It is more expensive than ASA but is far cheaper than Checkpoint. So, pricing wise, it is right in the middle."
"Expensive, but that's because it provides everything."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
47%
Healthcare Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
6%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics?
The most valuable feature of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is its reliability.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics?
Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics could reduce the price to allow all countries to afford it. The price is expensive.
What needs improvement with Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics?
Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics could improve by having quicker detection and response and web analysis.
What do you like most about Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB?
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB is a great way to keep your network secure and safe from malicious websites. It's my favorite feature because it allows me to easily customize and tailo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering with PAN-DB?
The solution is based on a subscription for the firewall. The subscriptions and the hardware have more than quadrupled in the last three years. They are pricing themselves out of the K-12 markets.
 

Also Known As

Cognitive Threat Analytics, CTA
Palo Alto Networks URL Filtering PAN-DB
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Transplace
TRI-AD, Telkom Indonesia
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.