We performed a comparison between Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics and Cisco Secure Network Analytics based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS)."The most valuable feature of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is its reliability."
"Cisco Stealthwatch provides the solutions analytics and threat detection capabilities that I am looking for. It has also improved the network visibility of our organization."
"The most valuable features are encrypted threat analysis and the ability to run jobs on entire flows."
"Cisco Stealthwatch has predefined alerts for different types of security issues that might happen in the network. Whether it's PCs or servers that are used for botnets or Bitcoin mining we receive the alerts automatically. This functionality is what we receive from the solution out of the box."
"If you are using Darktrace or NAC solutions you can integrate Stealthwatch."
"Another notable feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is its Layer 7 visibility, which allows us to monitor and analyze network communications at the application layer."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its reporting and mitigation capabilities."
"The artifacts available in the tool provide better information for analyzing network traffic. It enables a holistic view of network traffic and general packet analysis. It's easy to identify anomalies without the use of signatures. The way in which we implemented Stealthwatch Cloud has enabled my team to analyze traffic behind proxies."
"It provides good visibility to the customers. People are still evaluating it, but it provides visibility and helps them to take action to remediate and mitigate the issues that are highlighted on the dashboard. It has good integration with the Cisco switching platform."
"Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics could improve by having quicker detection and response and web analysis."
"Cisco could improve the administration for the customers."
"I would like to see it better organized when I'm looking at it."
"The initial setup was complex."
"The visualization could be improved, the GUI is not the best."
"Cisco Stealthwatch needs more integration with device discovery. We have to do a lot of hard work to figure out what things are. Better service integration is required."
"The initial setup was straightforward but required a lot of data entry, to begin with building out the server types and network types."
"Complexity on integration is not so straightforward and you really need an expert to help build it out."
"We haven't seen ROI."
More Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is ranked 23rd in Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) with 1 review while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 24th in Network Monitoring Software with 58 reviews. Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is rated 10.0, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics writes "Simple deployment, reliable, and helpful support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". Cisco Cognitive Threat Analytics is most compared with , whereas Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Splunk User Behavior Analytics.
We monitor all Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.