We compared Cloudflare DNS and Quad9 in several parameters based on reviews we have collected from users and you can find our conclusion below:
Based on user feedback, Cloudflare DNS is a highly recommended solution. Users appreciate its easy setup, quick DNS record updates, strong security features, worldwide coverage, scalability, reasonable pricing, compatibility with Office 365, caching ability, and minimal latency. They also value the Cloudflare API for creating distinct environments and updating zone codes. On the other hand, Quad9 is regarded as simple to configure and cost-effective, but it lacks personalized DNS filtering and raises concerns about performance and responsiveness.
"It is a stable solution. I rate the stability a ten out of ten...I rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"The solution automatically detects and responds to certain types of traffic based on geolocation."
"Its most significant benefit to date is the speed with which it refreshes DNS records on the internet once you change it. If you are changing a website or registering a new record, it is very quick."
"I get a lot of value from Cloudflare's API because it enables you to build a separate environment inside the solution. You can create a domain for performing test requests before you move to the production environment and connect various domains."
"The most valuable feature of Cloudflare DNS is security."
"Even when there is a high load on our servers, Cloudflare is able to cache the data and serve it to users, ensuring they can still access the website."
"Cloudflare DNS is widely used, and it's good for websites. If we use Cloudflare DNS and update one record, it updates in their office instantly."
"The attacker won't have details since my public IP is anonymous. It offers us good privacy."
"The most valuable feature of Quad9 is that it is a free solution."
"Setting up Quad9 is straightforward if you know what you're doing, and it's easy to use overall."
"There might be helpful if there was some web application firewall feature."
"The tool needs to improve caching of servers. The product needs to include PFX certificate as well."
"The documentation could improve for Cloudflare DNS."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"We have noticed multiple instances where Cloudflare falsely indicates that our servers are down, even when there is no actual load on them. This makes it challenging for us to identify the exact issue."
"Cloudflare doesn't have a reverse lookup. We can only do a DNS lookup to get the IP address from the hostname. It doesn't work if you want to look up the hostname from an IPA address."
"I believe they currently have this feature, but there will most likely be integration with APIs so we can control some features through API."
"Areas like how assessment, discovery, and payload are dealt with and how it all comes into your organization can be considered when trying to make suggestions to Cloudflare for improvements."
"It used to work fine for all the devices, but it started to slow and become non-responsive. I would have to reload the page two or three times before all the pages loaded. With OpenDNS, I only need to load the page once."
"Quad9 could improve by having more free features, such as custom DNS filtering."
Cloudflare DNS is ranked 1st in Managed DNS with 13 reviews while Quad9 is ranked 4th in Managed DNS with 2 reviews. Cloudflare DNS is rated 8.6, while Quad9 is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Cloudflare DNS writes "A tool that offers good performance that needs to improve in areas like assessment and payload". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quad9 writes "It's easy to use and set up, but I've faced performance problems ". Cloudflare DNS is most compared with Azure DNS, Google Cloud DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Amazon Route 53 and Hurricane Electric Free DNS, whereas Quad9 is most compared with Google Cloud DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Verisign Public DNS, Neustar UltraDNS and Hurricane Electric Free DNS. See our Cloudflare DNS vs. Quad9 report.
See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.
We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.