Cisco Nexus vs NETGEAR Switches comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Nexus
Ranking in LAN Switching
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
101
Ranking in other categories
Data Center Networking (3rd)
NETGEAR Switches
Ranking in LAN Switching
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Ethernet Switches (4th), AV Over IP Switching (2nd)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the LAN Switching category, the market share of Cisco Nexus is 10.2% and it decreased by 2.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of NETGEAR Switches is 7.2% and it increased by 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
LAN Switching
Unique Categories:
Data Center Networking
23.2%
Ethernet Switches
8.4%
AV Over IP Switching
23.8%
 

Featured Reviews

Joe Benítez - PeerSpot reviewer
May 24, 2023
Offer high performance capabilities and enables efficient data transmission and processing
Before Nexus, I used to have Catalyst 6500 switches. Those 6500 series chassis gave us a lot of problems. Too many problems, actually. And we had a Cisco ASA firewall blade within those chassis. And they were running outdated software. So, in fact, it was the firewall blade that caused us too many problems instead of the chassis. The chassis itself was working well and performing fine, but the firewall card was not suitable for our needs. That was one aspect. Additionally, those chassis had been in operation for more than five years. As we are a local government, we have a policy to renew hardware every five years. That's because we need to maintain all the hardware and software in the latest versions and keep up with the technology lifecycle of the technology we use.
BH
Feb 7, 2023
Peak performance for uncompressed 4K video streaming at a very affordable price point
NETGEAR's web interface describes settings with names and sentences which are different from other switch manufacturers. Therefore, you must figure out what each one does before you can use it. If you compare it to Cisco, for example, their web interface is a bit more intuitive. The web interface could also be improved when it comes to multicast settings. Especially, that IGMP is spread to “Switching” and “Routing“ is confusing. At first, it is unclear what needs to be setup where. Support for IGMPv3 querier would be appreciated. Currently, only a version 2 querier can be sent by the switches, which is a bit outdated, since version 3 has been on the market for a few years now. Cisco does support querier version 3 in their small business switches. The ‘how-to’ guides could do with some improvements. We got in trouble following the stacking and Dante set-up guides. If these would have been accurate, we would not have lost three days.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We used older versions of Cisco Cloud. The reason why we switched was just adapting with the times."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it scales well. It supports a lot of servers. We don't have to come up with different designs for anything. That's the best part about it."
"This is a powerful device and I can get good bandwidth."
"The biggest benefit to this solution is a high port density with high bandwidth."
"Technical support has been very, very helpful and they offer good SLAs."
"It's pretty easy to use and operates at high speed."
"The most valuable feature of the 7700 series is probably the multi-context subset VRS, which lets you use multi-VRS, multi-context, and also VPC setup, where you have two logical devices that are still separate in terms of management planes, but have shared, virtual core channels."
"Current flexibility and the opportunities for future planning and scaling make this product line an ultimate opportunity."
"The initial setup is easy."
"This switch is Layer 3, so it is a totally managed system."
"Remote management is the most important thing for us. And monitoring, of course, allows us to see when something is wrong with a client. We get notified that an access point is down, for instance, or that there are too many clients on one access point, so that we can log into the portal and manage the solution with the client instantly, from either a laptop or a cell phone, with the Insight app."
"I'm satisfied with the stability of NETGEAR Switches."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is easy to use."
"The solution is stable."
"The ease of use of these switches is very good because of the Cisco CLI. If you are familiar with CLI, then you can configure the switch that way. It also has a relatively straightforward web interface. Using the web interface is good for beginners or people who aren't familiar with Cisco CLI. However, having a common command line interface method is great for some of our more advanced guys who are familiar with it."
"The solution helps transfer data."
 

Cons

"There's been a little bit of bugginess in the code, but that happens."
"I don't really deal with the pricing but I know that it's not cheap."
"I would like to see more automation and for it to be easier to use."
"We lag on the configuration. The changes make a difference in troubleshooting."
"I would like to see a central management solution in order to have all of the equipment in one place."
"Technical support could be better."
"I would like to see the integration of the products into something where it's seamless where an engineer never touches the switch again, never does CLI and you move to an application based network organization."
"They need to understand that when we call them and have an issue, it's our production and sometimes they want us to do repairs that would cause other issues. That's the biggest problem."
"My one issue with it is that not all the features of the switch can currently be managed via the portal. For some of the more advanced features, you still have to configure the switch."
"Perhaps in the future, we will have even more different types of switches and be able to fulfill more collections."
"This product lacks a CLI interface."
"The security features must be improved."
"There are some design issues on which they really missed the boat. The problem has to do with rack mounting them because the lights and jacks should all be on the front, and the power on the back. The way they did it makes it really difficult to use them in a rack environment, because when the lights are on the opposite side of the jacks... you usually can't see the back side of a rack. You can't get back there to see, so it's just crazy."
"Netgear switches could be cheaper."
"Support needs to be improved."
"The main negative thing is the speed. When you use the portal, if you have a lot of customers and locations in the portal, and you need to scroll through those clients or those locations, it takes a pretty long time to load those pages and to select the client. That's the problem in the portal on the laptop, and it's the same problem in the portal on the app."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are approximately $2,000 USD per year."
"Cisco Nexus is not a cheaply priced product."
"If you compare Cisco hardware to any other vendors, such as HPE, they are more expensive. There is a license to use the solution. If my customer's licenses are about to expire I receive notification from Cisco, this is very helpful."
"We consider Juniper switches to be more affordable."
"The solution should be more cost-effective in general."
"The solution is expensive."
"We have a virtual license."
"Our licensing fees are paid annually."
"The product is priced economically."
"NETGEAR pricing is the best on the market by far. I was shocked when I saw what their price came out as for their subscription. It's extremely reasonable."
"In terms of the NETGEAR stuff, there weren't any surprises. The costs were definitely fair, especially considering what we were replacing. For the equivalent performance from a non-AV over IP solution, it would have been easily been in the $40,000 range. Comparing it to standard AV video switching, the price was very good, especially considering now they can add-on without any massive additional costs."
"They're good value. They're good entry-level switches. I know Cisco generally has a lot more capability. But, for an organization this size, we don't need that. So they're good value for the cost and what we need."
"Compared to other large names in the marketplace, the price of NETGEAR's product is extremely cost-effective compared to what Cisco or Extreme offer."
"The solution is expensive. You need to pay the costs one-time."
"It's cheaper than Cisco. For the features it offers, the pricing is good."
"This is a one-time purchase and there are no licensing fees."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
7%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Nexus?
The product's initial setup phase is very easy.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Nexus?
Cisco Nexus is not a cheaply priced product. The tool offers a perpetual-based licensing model and subscription-based licensing model. For Cisco's hardware and RMA process, you need to opt for a su...
What needs improvement with Cisco Nexus?
The product's high price is an area of concern where improvements are required. Cisco Nexus should lower its current prices.
How do NETGEAR switches compare with Cisco ethernet switches?
NetGear switches have a lot to offer. They have high availability, zero-downtime stacking, L2 and L3 functionality, and are AV-over-IP ready. NetGear switches also have a command line interface and...
Which switches are better - Ubiquiti Unifi or Netgear?
Ubiquiti Unifi offers a great set of features. For starters, it is easy to configure and implement, and also doesn’t require a learning curve because it is easy to use. It is also simple to reconfi...
What do you like most about NETGEAR Switches?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten. I have not faced any issues with the product whatsoever.
 

Also Known As

No data available
NETGEAR Insight Managed Switches, NETGEAR GC Series, NETGEAR M Series
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Blaze Networks
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus vs. NETGEAR Switches and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.