Cisco UCS Manager vs SolarWinds NPM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
29th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SolarWinds NPM
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
147
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (6th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the market share of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.7% and it increased by 9.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of SolarWinds NPM is 4.0% and it decreased by 29.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Network Monitoring Software
6.4%
Cloud Monitoring Software
7.7%
 

Featured Reviews

NE
Dec 20, 2022
The solution is agile, stable, scalable, and has good support
There are quite a few components when it comes to operating servers, and the process has to be done in a sequence. If UCS provided a functionality to set up all of my sequences in one go, for example, I want to apply this piece of software now, and once this is done, I want to apply this piece of software, it would be great. I want to be able to schedule multiple sequential updates in one go. Also, I've been trying the solution on a mobile device, and it doesn't work that great. They could probably do with redesigning the interface so it works for different device sizes and resolutions.
AbdulKader Mohandes - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2023
It's a reasonably priced solution with excellent support
I use SolarWinds for monitoring. We have around 300 people at my company.  I like the NPM and SAM features.  The integration with video apps could be better. I have used SolarWinds NPM for one year.  SolarWinds NPM is stable. SolarWinds NPM is scalable. I rate SolarWinds support nine out…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Cisco UCS Manager is overall a good package because it gives a GUI interface and a CLI."
"From a usability and functionality perspective, Cisco UCS Manager is very good."
"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."
"The reporting functionality will give you any report you want."
"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution."
"It is more robust than other solutions. So, the stability is good."
"The interface is ergonomic and native. We can use UCS Manager to do all the configurations for the servers, including storage, networking, and all the other components we need inside the fabric. It's simple and flexible."
"We can configure the Cisco UCS Manager, the profiles and interactions with the resource we manage."
"I can do everything remotely, including running PowerShell scripts or performing standard updates."
"Technical support has always been great. They are very responsive. We've been satisfied with their level of support."
"Technical support is very helpful with our upgrades."
"The solution is extremely stable. We haven't had any issues in that regard. We haven't had issues with bugs, glitches, or crashes."
"The biggest thing for me is that it provided enough information for me to monitor. It alerts and provides you with the information you need."
"There are a lot of options for customization of the dashboard, alerts, and reports."
"It's a very good tool and a very stable tool."
"One of the best features is the reports feature."
 

Cons

"The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced."
"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."
"What's lacking in Cisco UCS Manager is the performance dashboard. If a blade has any performance issues, you should be able to create a dashboard on Cisco UCS Manager. Currently, this feature isn't present."
"Getting a CLI report on routers, switches, or any other CLI configuration device is difficult."
"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."
"The automation within the solution needs to be simplified."
"Upgrading the firmware is a difficult procedure."
"The pricing can be better."
"The integration with the APIs and the web servers deployed can definitely be improved."
"One of the challenges with SolarWinds is that in order to pull the data, we have to have a lot of false positives."
"Scalability is a bit tricky because it requires more gateways in order to get the performance you may need. It also requires a lot of licensing."
"The integration needs to be improved."
"In terms of scalability, there is room for improvement. When you start monitoring, if you have so many interfaces and you're trying to monitor them at a faster interval, or a shorter interval, you get to a point where you need to request another node."
"The solution could improve in many areas, such as the marketing and description of the products, providing areas of improvement, cloud capabilities, and being able to be more streamlined with the current integration points with other applications."
"Technical support can be slow to respond."
"They have had a rather large security breach in the past. It's cost some companies customers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."
"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."
"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."
"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."
"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."
"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."
"There can be fees in addition to the licensing fees if you add on."
"You have to license it per year, for the support. You don't really need to have support once you've already set it up. Once you install SolarWinds, you can skip on the licensing. It will still work."
"The NPM component of the system costs approximately $1,000 USD per year."
"It's expensive and there are costs in addition to the standard licensing."
"I find that the pricing is acceptable."
"We pay approximately $700 per year for renewal of the license."
"Though I don't remember the price for SolarWinds NPM, its price is somewhat okay when you compare it with other tools in the market. The price isn't too high and isn't too low, so it's okay."
"SolarWinds NPM is very expensive, and we pay ten thousand yearly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user174738 - PeerSpot reviewer
May 31, 2015
Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor
I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
34%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
51%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?
When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?
We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum.
What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?
The solution's pricing is high and could be reduced. Compared to other systems, memory failure in Cisco UCS Manager is much higher.
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
It actually depends on the exact purpose or kind of devices (network devices, servers, something else). Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better for a cloud monitoring...
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
We are partners with SolarWinds and we sell a lot of Network management to large enterprises also because of scalability, products like Network Performance Monitor & Netflow Traffic Analyzer ar...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor, SolarWinds Network Bandwidth Analyzer
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals
Microsoft, Federal Express, Hewlett-Packard, and MasterCard
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. SolarWinds NPM and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.