We performed a comparison between Datadog and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The application performance monitoring is pretty good."
"The fact that everything is under a single pane of glass is really valuable, as developers don't have to spend their time copying correlation IDs across tools to find what they need."
"The full stack of integrations made it easier to monitor the different technologies and platform providers, including Software as a Service providers, that otherwise would need a lot of work and customization to be able to see what is happening."
"The most valuable features are the dashboards and the reporting."
"Datadog agents act as an integration to different services, providing easy access and management."
"The dashboards are great."
"Its integration definitely stands out. It provides seamless monitoring of all our systems, services, apps, and whatever else we secure and monitor. Visualizations have become simpler with dashboards. We are getting visibility into systems, services, and apps stack through a single pane of glass, which is good. We are able to put logs in context."
"The observability on offer is the most useful aspect of the product."
"Gives us one platform to monitor and access or configure all the servers or the 3PAR, etc."
"Provides the strongest support for automation."
"It gives us a view of all our servers, which we did not have before in real-time."
"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."
"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."
"Profile templates: The ability to generate the profiles and lay them down so the servers are built consistently. I would say that's probably the biggest piece of it."
"It monitors all our servers, and if there is any problem it straight away sends us an alert. If It's a faulty component, we can see it from there. It sends an alert."
"OneView provides a single console, which is manageable without physical access."
"The Log Explorer could be better. I don't think it has log manipulation as Splunk does."
"We need more integration functionality, including certain metrics integration."
"The documentation leaves a lot to be desired for new users."
"Datadog is so feature-rich that it is often hard to onboard new folks and tough to decide where to invest time."
"Even though it is powerful on its own, the UI-based design lacks elegance, efficiency, and complexity."
"I've only been using Datadog for a few months, and at first, it was frankly overwhelming in terms of both the UI and the available capabilities."
"The product needs to have more enterprise approach to configuration."
"We need to learn more about the session reply feature inside of DD."
"We've had issues, for example, with RAM."
"They can improve reporting and provide more customized reports. Currently, reporting is a bit limited. It can be complex to learn and manage for beginners. Because of my experience, I find it comfortable to manage, which might not be the case with beginners. It would be good if they can make it a little bit easier to understand. They can provide a more graphical view of connectivity and other things. Their technical support can also be improved."
"We have a version 3 and a version 1.2, but the upgrade process from the 1.2 to the 3 is kind of an issue."
"It needs more reporting capabilities."
"It's a little slow sometimes. Overall, I think it does what it's supposed to do. I think that as they evolve it, it'll get quicker."
"HPE OneView should be able to cover more device models apart from ProLiant and Synergy."
"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."
"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 16th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and ServiceNow IT Operations Management. See our Datadog vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.