DocuSign CLM vs IBM FileNet comparison

DocuSign CLM

Read 1 DocuSign CLM review

715 Views
630 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

IBM FileNet

Read 94 IBM FileNet reviews

4,794 Views
2,902 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

DocuSign CLM

IBM FileNet

Categories and Ranking

DocuSign CLM

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Contract Management Software (2nd)

IBM FileNet

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (6th)

Featured Reviews

Jeanette Wayne

Senior Director, Chief of Staff & Program Management Office (PMO) at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees

Jul 15, 2018

Our contracts are moving from draft to full authorization significantly faster now

We needed to create a central repository for contracts. We needed a way to drive consistency into how contracts were drafted (formal templates). We needed to accelerate the end-to-end process Our contracts are moving through the process, from draft to full authorization, 340 percent faster than…

Read full review

Moshe Elbaz

IT Manager & FileNet Specialist at IFN

Jan 23, 2024

A stable content management solution for document management

IBM FileNet is an enterprise content management solution. We use the solution for document management in the legal, insurance, and banking sectors We're implementing an on-premise solution. We're handling the installation of the product and customizing it to build a customized application…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"For the medium scale or large scale, I would recommend FileNet. FileNet is free of licensing expenses, thus good for the money. It is not expensive, but worth for the money, especially for medium scale and large scale industries."

"The tool is expensive, and I rate its pricing a ten out of ten."

"The licensing cost of FileNet is comparable."

"We use extraction. Therefore, we can see 80 to 85 percent accuracy on data extraction. This reduces the manual indexing part, which is definitely a gain on performance efficiency."

"Talking about the cost is difficult because IBM has offers that combine different products, and each of these offers has different types of licensing. IBM also has a policy that the actual price for a given customer may be very different from the stated book price. It's hard to say whether it's expensive or not."

"The solution saves time and money. It helps us to be able to accomplish the goals of our business, as opposed to being tangled in the weeds of what we could do."

"When it comes to pricing, IBM needs to make an effort to improve the cost. That's the main issue regarding use of FinalNet in Columbia."

"FileNet is not cheap, but you absolutely get what you pay for. "

More IBM FileNet pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about IBM FileNet?

The product is robust and can process a lot of documents for enterprise content management.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM FileNet?

The product is expensive. The price was 30% higher than what we needed to pay for IBM. I rate the product’s pricing a ten out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM FileNet?

The user interface of IBM content management, including the ability to customize screens without the need for coding, could be improved. Customers can use it to split the screen, enhancing its suit...

See all answers

Comparisons

DocuSign Gen vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 33% of the time

Icertis Contract Management vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 13% of the time

SirionLabs vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 12% of the time

Determine Contract Lifecycle Management vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 11% of the time

Lexion vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 9% of the time

More DocuSign CLM Competitors

SharePoint vs IBM FileNet

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText Documentum vs IBM FileNet

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Extended ECM vs IBM FileNet

Compared 13% of the time

IBM ECM vs IBM FileNet

Compared 9% of the time

Hyland OnBase vs IBM FileNet

Compared 8% of the time

More IBM FileNet Competitors

Product Reports

No data available

Buyer's Guide

IBM FileNet

June 2024

Download IBM FileNet product report

Learn More

Docusign

IBM

Overview

SpringCM's platform manages contracts, documents and all types of content. SpringCM includes powerful workflow, mobile and security features that eliminate time-consuming manual steps in critical business processes.

IBM FileNet is a leading IBM enterprise content management product family. IBM FileNet is one of the ECM solutions that can change the way a company does business by enabling users to capture, activate, socialize, analyze, and govern content throughout its lifecycle.

There are many IBM FileNet products available, all of which are integrated and based on the FileNet P8 Platform.

Sample Customers

Valvoline, Uber, Spotify, Popsugar, Facebook, NCR, USDA, US Department of Energy, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Suncorp Group Limited, St. Vincent Health, Citigroup, SRCSD, and UK Dept for Work and Pensions.

We monitor all Contract Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.