Fluix vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fluix
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
77th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Nintex Process Platform
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (8th), Workload Automation (10th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the market share of Fluix is 0.0% and it increased by 9.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8% and it decreased by 42.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Process Automation
2.7%
Workload Automation
0.2%
 

Featured Reviews

SS
Apr 12, 2023
Good support, easy to deploy, and scalable
We use the solution for SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online. The solution is deployed both on the cloud and on-prem The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online. The…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Comparatively, it's expensive."
"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."
"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."
"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."
"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."
"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."
"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."
"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about K2?
The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?
The solution doesn’t have an extra fee. We are compatible with the package.
What needs improvement with K2?
The solution does not integrate with many platforms.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Siemens Gamesa, Reborn Cabinets, BMW, Ludwig Freitag
SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.