Fujitsu Interstage vs Mule ESB comparison

Fujitsu Interstage
  • 41 Views
  • 33 Comparison Views
Mule ESB
Read 46 Mule ESB reviews
  • 6,933 Views
  • 5,666 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Fujitsu Interstage and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Report (Updated: May 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
May 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 787,061 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Fujitsu Interstage
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
20th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (36th), Application Infrastructure (30th)
Mule ESB
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
46
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Use Fujitsu Interstage?
Share your opinion
Santosh Solapurkar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 8, 2022
Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable
We use Mule ESB for integrating with third-party vendors. Mule ESB bridge between internal systems and third-party systems. Additionally, we use it for enterprise, web, and APIs services The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"You will not get any support from Mule ESB's team for the tool's community edition...You can get support with the licensed version of Mule ESB."
"The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
"This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
"Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
"This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
"Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."
"Mule ESB is an expensive solution."
"This is expensive. In my next project, we had to go to other vendor."
More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
See all answers
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
See all answers
What do you like most about Mule ESB?
The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB Logo
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB
Compared 30% of the time
Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB Logo
Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB
Compared 12% of the time
Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB Logo
Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB
Compared 8% of the time
Red Hat Fuse vs Mule ESB Logo
Red Hat Fuse vs Mule ESB
Compared 7% of the time
webMethods Integration Server vs Mule ESB Logo
webMethods Integration Server vs Mule ESB
Compared 7% of the time
More Mule ESB Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Process Design
June 2024
Fujitsu Interstage reportDownload Fujitsu Interstage product report
Buyer's Guide
Mule ESB
May 2024
Mule ESB reportDownload Mule ESB product report
 

Also Known As

Interstage
No data available
 

Learn More

Fujitsu
MuleSoft
 

Overview

Enables companies to model, automate, manage and optimize their business processes.
For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.
 

Sample Customers

Panasonic Corporation, iHeart Studios
Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
May 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB). Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.