We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and Red Hat Fuse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"Mule ESB has a user-friendly design, and everything is in one place. The API and architecture are popular right now. Also, MuleSoft has a large and supportive online community."
"I like that Mule ESB provides fast and good technical support."
"The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most."
"The connectors help to connect with a variety of applications."
"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."
"It's open source, and there are a lot of community resources. Mule ESB makes it easy to connect to other software applications."
"The most valuable feature for Mule is the number of connectors that are available."
"More than a feature, I would say that the reliability of the platform is the most valuable aspect."
"Red Hat Fuse's best features are that it's very easy to set up and maintain."
"The features I found most valuable in Red Hat Fuse are the OSB framework, containerization, and the integration of Apache technologies such as the NQ channel, CXF, etc. These are the features that are very prominent in the solution. Red Hat Fuse also offers flexibility, so it's another valuable characteristic of the solution."
"It's very lightweight. There's no need for any specialized tools in order to deploy any service for Red Hat Fuse."
"The stability has been good."
"What I like about Red Hat Fuse is that it's a well-established integration software. I find all aspects of the tool positive."
"The support training that comes with the product is amazing."
"The most valuable feature is that it's the same as Apache Camel."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"There are some issues with both stability and scalability."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"It would be beneficial if users could navigate the UI easily without extensive training or learning curves."
"From an improvement perspective, there should be fewer coding challenges for users in Mule ESB."
"It should have some amount of logging."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
"I would like to see more up-to-date documentation and examples from Red Hat Fuse."
"The testing part, specifically when running it in the cloud, could be improved. It's a little bit complex, especially considering its cloud nature."
"Red Hat is not easy to learn. You can learn it but you sometimes need external expertise to implement solutions."
"The solution will be discontinued in 2024."
"The main issue with Red Hat Fuse is the outdated and scattered documentation."
"There is definitely a bit of a learning curve."
"The pricing model could be adjusted. The price should be lower."
"Our clients would like to see the user interface improved so that it is more user-friendly."
Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 46 reviews while Red Hat Fuse is ranked 4th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 23 reviews. Mule ESB is rated 8.0, while Red Hat Fuse is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat Fuse writes "Configurable, doesn't require much coding, and has an automatic load balancing feature, but its development features need improvement". Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, webMethods Integration Server and IBM DataPower Gateway, whereas Red Hat Fuse is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, JBoss ESB and webMethods Integration Server. See our Mule ESB vs. Red Hat Fuse report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
