We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and SAP S4HANA on AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's available any time you need it."
"It is easy to use and has a very familiar interface."
"Google Cloud is very user-friendly."
"Google Meet is simple to use regarding configuration and recording sessions."
"Google Cloud has low downtime."
"For us, the solution is very easy to use. We have the right skillsets for it."
"The performance is a valuable feature."
"The stability is good with Google Cloud."
"We have found the retail business features to be the most valuable."
"The HANA database is a valuable feature"
"After the implementation phase of the product, it becomes a very stable tool."
"There are two main features that we find very valuable. One is the interface and the new user experience. That's really, really helpful for the end-user. The second is the HANA database itself because it speeds up the process. In other solutions, like Oracle, there is a lot of redundancy that slows things down."
"It's easy to use and user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of SAP S4HANA on AWS are that it's simplified and the analytical capabilities are good."
"I appreciate the reliability and performance of SAP S/4HANA on AWS. It demonstrates high integration and stability, making it a widely used choice in various industries, including manufacturing, such as factories, carmakers, and battery production. It effectively covers a broad spectrum of business areas, which is beneficial."
"They have their own instances where you can host your database."
"The UI is beautiful but not easy to use, and also a little slow. Anything that you click is slow to load. It is also not easy to find something. I do not find the left-hand side menu good. We have a lot of options mixed there and we need the best way to deploy cloud resources. I prefer Azure ARM templates since their JSON files are easy to manipulate and integrate with other tools."
"Sometimes the Google documents are difficult to learn from. Amazon has better support material."
"Google is slower to support .NET."
"I consider Azure more secure than Google and Amazon because of all its certifications, but Google is secure enough and improving."
"The solution should be more configurable for high-volume databases."
"The Notes application could be better."
"The price could improve. Every customer would agree, that they would like the price to be reduced."
"The solution could improve by being less expensive."
"There are a few complexities when it comes to licensing that could be simplified."
"We had some storage and legacy migrations problems with SAP S4HANA on AWS."
"The platform's front-end user interface needs improvement compared to other applications."
"This solution is very resource-intensive, including high memory and CPU utilization."
"S4HANA is expensive. It costs much more than SuccessFactors."
"I would like scalability to be improved in the future for faster performance."
"Businesses are particularly interested in process automation, mobile, and web applications. These are the areas that SAP S4HANA is and should be looking to improve on, especially in terms of streamlining processes and automating certain steps."
"The manufacturing application system, it's not as user-friendly in S4HANA."
Google Cloud is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 66 reviews while SAP S4HANA on AWS is ranked 7th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 35 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while SAP S4HANA on AWS is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S4HANA on AWS writes "With good documentation in place, the solution offers good technical support to its users". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Pivotal Cloud Foundry and Amazon Lightsail, whereas SAP S4HANA on AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Amazon AWS and Alibaba Cloud. See our Google Cloud vs. SAP S4HANA on AWS report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.