We performed a comparison between Google Cloud and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The stability is good with Google Cloud."
"I have found this solution to be a quick and advanced way to run my models through."
"The solution scales well."
"It's easy to work with."
"The availability of content on the solution is very valuable."
"The stability of Google Cloud is currently good."
"We can increase the storage as we need."
"This platform is popular with technical users because of the abilities for customization and fine-tuning performance."
"I find the Single Sign-On, SSO, feature to be valuable."
"Oracle Cloud Platform has good scalability."
"The feature I think should be improved is the option to rename the machines."
"Overall, I would say that Oracle Cloud provides support with zero down time and the high probability is very good."
"The stability of the solution is very good...The technical support is good."
"Oracle Cloud Platform is a good solution because with large data platforms the data migration can be a challenge and this is the reason to move and migrate towards the cloud from on-premises."
"The simple infrastructure of the service is very useful."
"It is more secure and more controlled than an on-premises deployment."
"Training in new advancements, technologies, or AI would help us understand how to best use the solution."
"Sometimes the Google documents are difficult to learn from. Amazon has better support material."
"The solution should be more configurable for high-volume databases."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"There are issues with stability."
"Integration is always something that can be improved."
"I find it hard to download items, especially on their operating system."
"If there were more documentation and training, it would be very helpful in explaining the underlying processes."
"Database instances and computer storage are areas with shortcomings in the product that need improvement."
"The solution's scalability is an area with shortcomings...Mid-level customers feel that Oracle is not scalable in their environment and is an enterprise-level segment solution."
"There's one app I have to install on my device, the Articulate Player app. It's only available on Apple and Android, but it's not available for Windows. I can't run the program on my desktop, to use it to learn Java."
"Amazon AWS has a better solution overall."
"Technical support does not offer the best service and should be improved."
"Oracle Cloud's support could be improved because its second-line support has weak engineers who handle stuff a little bit slowly."
"The product’s pricing should be reduced."
"They offer some basic services but the choice is not as rich as other cloud providers."
More Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud is ranked 4th in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 66 reviews while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is ranked 3rd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 91 reviews. Google Cloud is rated 8.2, while Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud writes "Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) writes "Cost-effective and can be used to host OIC and APEX". Google Cloud is most compared with Alibaba Cloud, Linode, Pivotal Cloud Foundry, OpenShift and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, IBM Public Cloud, OpenShift and Alibaba Cloud. See our Google Cloud vs. Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) report.
See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors and best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.