Hyland OnBase vs Laserfiche Rio comparison

Hyland OnBase
Read 8 Hyland OnBase reviews
  • 2,647 Views
  • 1,618 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Laserfiche Rio
Read 1 Laserfiche Rio review
  • 290 Views
  • 171 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Hyland OnBase and Laserfiche Rio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Content Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
May 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 787,061 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (25th), Low-Code Development Platforms (22nd)
Laserfiche Rio
Ranking in Enterprise Content Management
23rd
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Document Management Software (12th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the market share of Hyland OnBase is 7.9% and it increased by 37.0% compared to the previous year. The market share of Laserfiche Rio is 0.7% and it increased by 176.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Content Management
Unique Categories:
Business Process Management (BPM)
0.5%
Low-Code Development Platforms
0.5%
Document Management Software
4.1%
 

Q&A Highlights

GP
Nov 01, 2019
Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?
I am not familiar with LaserFiche or AuraPortal, but we employ OnBase here and I am familiar with IBM's ECM platform. Without splitting too many hairs, tools like these provide a "content-enabled" workflow and are often referred to as Enterprise Content Management (ECM) systems. That is, they don't do anything until a piece of content presents itself for processing. They are very good at automating/mechanizing a wide variety of business processes that have a form (paper or electronic) associated with them. Business Process Management packages are designed to be able to create workflows that do not depend on a piece of content to function properly. So, it depends on what problem you are trying to solve. If the business process that you are trying to automate has content (forms, faxes, etc) then ECM packages like OnBase, LaserFiche, etc. might fit your need. If you need to automate processes that do not require content, then a more traditional BPM system might be required.
See all answers
 

Featured Reviews

NG
Dec 8, 2022
Good security and dashboards with a low-code environment
The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market. That said, it depends on the use case that the customer has. They need to focus on security for financial organizations and healthcare domains that are using it. For them, while the current dashboards are meeting their needs, the market is changing. They do need some transformation on top of it. In terms of reporting, we don't have anything on the artificial intelligence side. For example, if one of my customers is uploading their invoice, they have an OCR feature which is known as Optical Character Recognition, and their system does read those things; however, in this solution, they don't have a mechanism, as of now, to improve it further. Therefore, if I have uploaded an invoice that includes my name, it should be able to suggest to me that there are other documents that already have this name in them. The search engines could use some artificial intelligence to make the solution much, much better. If I'm using Google, and if I try to search for a name with a string, it will show me all the files which are coming with the name, which are all the listings of the files, before I add the complete name. Then it will start displaying the list of files. The search functionality in this product should offer a similar approach and make suggestions based on what you are typing. The troubleshooting guidelines could be more clear during the initial setup.
Read full review
CB
Jul 31, 2019
A powerful solution that offers BPM and automation to assist with our digital transformation
We use this solution for DMS, ECM, scan and imaging, plus workflows and forms solutions spread over the entire company This is a very complete and powerful solution. No code: We can address all of the features and functionalities with computer-minded people without having to call the IT Dept or…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like the cloud and its integrability."
"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."
"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."
"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."
"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."
"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."
"This is a very complete and powerful solution."
 

Cons

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."
"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."
"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."
"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."
"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."
"We would like to see more features for RPA and AI."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."
"The tool's price is high."
"OnBase is reasonably priced."
"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Answers from the Community

GP
Nov 1, 2019
Nov 1, 2019
Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?
I am not familiar with LaserFiche or AuraPortal, but we employ OnBase here and I am familiar with IBM's ECM platform. Without splitting too many hairs, tools like these provide a "content-enabled" workflow and are often referred to as Enterprise Content Management (ECM) systems. That is, they don't do anything until a piece of content presents itself for processing. They are very good at automa...
See 2 answers
PD
Nov 1, 2019
Laserfiche and OnBase can both be classified as such. They both run very robust Business Process Management applications. I personally know that the Laserfiche application has grown enormously over the past few years and is classified by the Gartner Group as one of the leaders in the industry. If you would like more specifics I would gladly discuss with you but would require a few more details.
Read full answer
it_user1081452 - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 1, 2019
I am not familiar with LaserFiche or AuraPortal, but we employ OnBase here and I am familiar with IBM's ECM platform. Without splitting too many hairs, tools like these provide a "content-enabled" workflow and are often referred to as Enterprise Content Management (ECM) systems. That is, they don't do anything until a piece of content presents itself for processing. They are very good at automating/mechanizing a wide variety of business processes that have a form (paper or electronic) associated with them. Business Process Management packages are designed to be able to create workflows that do not depend on a piece of content to function properly. So, it depends on what problem you are trying to solve. If the business process that you are trying to automate has content (forms, faxes, etc) then ECM packages like OnBase, LaserFiche, etc. might fit your need. If you need to automate processes that do not require content, then a more traditional BPM system might be required.
Read full answer
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
12%
Insurance Company
9%
Educational Organization
36%
Government
16%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Comms Service Provider
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?
The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?
The tool's price is high.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?
We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated.
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase Logo
Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 18% of the time
SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase Logo
SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 13% of the time
OpenText Documentum vs Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Documentum vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 12% of the time
IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 10% of the time
OpenText Extended ECM vs Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Extended ECM vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 9% of the time
More Hyland OnBase Competitors
SharePoint vs Laserfiche Rio Logo
SharePoint vs Laserfiche Rio
Compared 36% of the time
DocuWare vs Laserfiche Rio Logo
DocuWare vs Laserfiche Rio
Compared 32% of the time
OpenText eDOCS vs Laserfiche Rio Logo
OpenText eDOCS vs Laserfiche Rio
Compared 32% of the time
More Laserfiche Rio Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
June 2024
Hyland OnBase reportDownload Hyland OnBase product report
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
May 2024
Laserfiche Rio reportDownload Laserfiche Rio product report
 

Also Known As

OnBase
No data available
 

Learn More

Hyland
Laserfiche
 

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Powerful Document Management Software and Agile Enterprise Content Management Solutions
 

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
D.L. Evans, College of the Desert, Community Action, Tompkins County, Hanson McClain, Olmsted County, Old Line Bank, Steinhafels, CIRCOR Pibiviesse
Buyer's Guide
Enterprise Content Management
May 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OpenText, Box and others in Enterprise Content Management. Updated: May 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.