Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Instana and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Instana is ranked #33 with an average rating of 10.0, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Instana holds a 0.5% mindshare in IM, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Instana users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Read 2 Instana Infrastructure Monitoring reviews

739 Views
569 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 112 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

8,256 Views
4,788 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Instana Infrastructure Monitoring both compete in the network and infrastructure monitoring market. PRTG holds an advantage with its cost-effectiveness and customer support, while Instana's rich features justify its higher investment.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor includes a range of custom sensors, an intuitive alert system, and is tailored for diverse network situations. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring offers robust application performance monitoring, automatic root cause analysis, and is suited for dynamic environments requiring advanced features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward installation with strong customer support, making it suitable for users seeking simplicity. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring involves a complex setup with automated code deployment, ideal for enterprises needing seamless integration.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor is recognized for flexible pricing, offering excellent ROI for small to mid-sized enterprises. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring comes with a higher setup cost but provides significant long-term value in larger IT landscapes with sophisticated monitoring tools.

To learn more, read our detailed Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. PRTG Network Monitor

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 873,003 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Instana Infrastructure Moni...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

33rd

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

22nd

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

4th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.1%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
PRTG Network Monitor	4.1%
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring	0.5%
Other	95.4%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Hakimuddin Ronaque

Assistant Manager at Lauren Information Technologies Pvt Ltd

Has the capability to automatically integrate with a large number of products

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten. I have not worked much on other technologies, like SAP or VMware's virtualization part, on-prem infrastructure, or cloud infrastructure. Instana Infrastructure Monitoring is so fast and easy to adapt that it works fine. I have not explored other operating systems or infrastructure solutions because my company doesn't have that customer scale. Most of our customers are on-prem or on AWS or Azure, but Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to their infrastructure very well. My company came to know how well Instana Infrastructure Monitoring adapts to our customers' infrastructures when we take care of the PoC phase. Around 12 to 15 people in my company use the product.

Read full review

madhan kumar hs

software engineer at Capgemini

Alerting precision has reduced incident response times and improved department-level network visibility

The auto-pause sensor during the maintenance window is good without any false alerts, and it prevents me from getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance, helping department heads understand their own network usage better. It has reduced incident response time by giving clearer ownership of each alert, ensuring alerts go to the proper recipient. SNMP testers and auto-pause are among the best features of PRTG Network Monitor, which is particularly useful for different departments such as HR and finance, where alerts can be filtered accordingly. The alerting features and dashboard of PRTG Network Monitor are very helpful, especially in our industry. However, the dashboard can look cluttered on smaller screens, which is one negative aspect. PRTG Network Monitor has impacted us positively; we have stopped getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance or unplanned outages. Compared to others, this gives specific alerts very quickly and helps department heads understand their own network usage better, thus reducing incident response time so that each alert has clear ownership.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to deploy."

"The product's initial setup is easy."

"The authentication links into our standard Active Directory authentication, which is very good."

"Accessibility, ease of use (Web GUI, MobileApps). In general, compared with other software"

"The most valuable feature of this solution is being able to see things graphically."

"The most valuable features of PRTG Network Monitor are user-friendly, and the graphical interface is good for all the network devices that are mapped in this organization. It's very easy to find reports for any devices that we are looking for."

"PRTG Network Monitor is easy to set up. Within a few minutes, it is operational."

"The sensors and remote probes are phenomenal. We use them for all of our global sites. The problem with our global sites are that they are all VPNs. If the link goes down, you can't monitor other solutions, as it just goes off the grid. Having remote probes allows them to still carry on and get the information that we need when it comes back up, sending the information to us."

"It has made our infrastructure more reliable."

"The most valuable feature is the dashboard interface. It's very clean, it's very simple to use."

More PRTG Network Monitor pros

Cons

"The product’s scalability is an area with certain limitations, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Instana Infrastructure Monitoring needs to support monitoring of the .NET framework since it is one of the areas where the solution currently has shortcomings."

"PRTG Network Monitor can be improved because the dashboard themes feel outdated."

"The most significant disadvantage of PRTG Network Monitor is that the dashboard for NetFlow is not user-friendly at all."

"I would like to see them take their graphing tools and convert them into a collector so that we can point telemetry to them"

"I would like to see a more robust platform and a new dashboard. In addition, the code is good, but it needs improvement."

"PRTG access works best from the web GUI. There are dedicated apps on Windows/Android/iOS, but they are slow and don’t work as well as the web GUI."

"PRTG could use reporting tools and mobile alert tools. It should be easier to diagnose and respond to problems from a mobile device on the go."

"The free version only gives us 100 free sensors to use. It would be nice if there was double that."

"The solution has to evolve as an end-to-end monitoring solution. It has to do better at understanding the application at the deepest level."

More PRTG Network Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of the tool is around 130 USD per month."

"The pricing for PRTG in our case is reasonable because we have a lot of applications to monitor within PRTG. It is not that expensive."

"We have an unlimited perpetual license, so we just pay support costs and it can scale throughout the organization."

"The licensing fees are billed annually and there are no costs in addition to this."

"Our licensing costs are 10,000 euros over three years."

"PRTG Network Monitor's price is a little high."

"We are using the basic PRTG that we can download for free. For now, we only need to monitor less than 100 devices. For more than 100 devices, we would need to buy a license. PRTG is much cheaper than SolarWinds."

"PRTG Network Monitor is cheap."

"If you're looking for a cost effective software I’d suggest this product."

More PRTG Network Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	46

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

The product is easy to deploy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

The product’s scalability is an area with certain limitations, making it an area where improvements are required.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Instana Infrastructure Monitoring?

I use the solution in my company, especially if an application is down and it is considered to be a P1 issue or a critical issue. The network team will blame the application team, while the applica...

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for PRTG Network Monitor is that it is reasonable.

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 19% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 14% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 14% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Instana Infrastructure Monitoring

Compared 13% of the time

More Instana Infrastructure Monitoring Competitors

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Enterprise Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

October 2025

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring report

Download Instana Infrastructure Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

October 2025

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Overview

Instana ensures that your application delivery organization has the data, visibility and information they need to manage the performance of critical business applications across the DevOps lifecycle. Built to handle the dynamic nature of containerized, microservice architectures, Instana automates infrastructure and application monitoring helping you to ensure the performance and quality of custom applications and accelerate your CI/CD cycle.

Instana

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

booxware, drivenow, scopevisio, enevo, TimoCom, mobitech

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. PRTG Network Monitor

September 2025

Free Report: Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. PRTG Network Monitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

873,003 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. PRTG Network Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.