Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiEDR
Sponsored
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
12th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Kaspersky Endpoint Security...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (12th), Endpoint Compliance (2nd)
Trellix Endpoint Security (...
Ranking in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
19th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
50
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) (19th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the market share of Fortinet FortiEDR is 5.0% and it increased by 36.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business is 4.1% and it increased by 0.8% compared to the previous year. The market share of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is 2.2% and it increased by 19.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Unique Categories:
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7.4%
Endpoint Compliance
30.9%
 

Featured Reviews

SP
May 1, 2023
We saw time to value within two weeks of implementing the solution, which strengthened our use cases
We use FortiAI, FortiSIEM, and FortiEDR Fortinet helped us scale large-scale deals with clients because of its strong offerings. Fortinet is very straightforward to use. I have access to a lot of technical resources, and I have been able to use them effectively. Fortinet has helped free up around…
Roymell Santos - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 5, 2024
Comprehensive protection with user-friendly features and efficient resource utilization
The reliability of Kaspersky Security is evident in its effectiveness in various use cases, including endpoint protection and antivirus functionalities Kaspersky supports the security needs of remote workforces by providing solutions tailored for remote usage. These solutions are particularly…
SF
Aug 17, 2021
Easy to use, stable, and not heavy on system resources
We are using this solution for endpoint security against cyber attacks FireEye Endpoint Security is easy to use and lightweight compared to others. Most of these types of solutions including others, such as Carbon Black and FortiEDR, all have the same features. However, Carbon Black is the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is stable and scalable."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"It notifies us if there's any suspicious file on any PC. If any execution or similar kind of thing is happening, it just alerts us. It doesn't only alert. It also blocks the execution until we allow it. We check whether the execution is legitimate or not, and then approve it or keep it blocked. This gives us a little bit of control over this mechanism. Fortinet FortiEDR is also very straightforward and easy to maintain."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Antivirus, including anti-spam, trojan, and worm detection and prevention. Kaspersky has a comprehensive virus definition update which is very helpful for threat prevention."
"The most valuable features for us include data security, as well as web browsing and password management security measures."
"The product can scale if you need it to."
"The malware threat detection has been excellent overall."
"The interface is friendly."
"The solution is secure."
"The blocking feature is the most valuable feature."
"The interface is really good. It's nice and simple."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."
"Trellix integrates well with most SIEM and data classification solutions."
"It's a stable solution with good performance."
"It is very valuable in finding out unknown malware."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"The performance is good."
 

Cons

"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"The solution is not stable."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"Currently, it doesn't have a cloud option. This is something that they should look into going forward."
"We have had some problems with it comes to uninstalling it, so you have to make sure that you do everything right."
"The encryption feature could improve."
"The solution's management console can be better and more granular than it is now."
"I would like to see machine learning and AI as added features."
"The product needs to incorporate training programs or webinars for users. The solution needs to improve its support as well. It also needs to detect ransomware."
"The stability could be better."
"Data loss prevention (DLP) in email security."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"If you have another endpoint product running on the same machine, you have to fine tune functions from FireEye to avoid performance and user experience issues."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The price should be improved, it's high."
"Sometimes, one might face issues with the scalability of the product. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement."
"It is a very heavy tool, unfortunately."
"The complexity of advanced modules can be improved."
"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."
"The email protection isn't efficient enough, and I'd like to see DLP features in the next release."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive and I would rate it 8 on the scale."
"The solution is not expensive."
"The hardware costs about €100,000 and about €20,000 annually for access."
"We got a good deal on licensing, so it is in the competitive range."
"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."
"Offered at a high price"
"It's moderately priced, neither cheap nor expensive."
"I know it is tough to get big budget additions up front, but I highly recommend deploying environment wide and adding the forensic service."
"It's a little more expensive compared to other competitors like Symantec."
"The solution's pricing is acceptable."
"The tool is expensive."
"For licensing, we pay a yearly subscription."
"Licensing fees are paid annually."
"It is a cost-effective product."
"We have an annual license and there is a fee per device used. The price is fair compared to the latest EDR solution."
"The pricing is a bit more expensive than other products."
"It is based on an annual subscription."
"The pricing is reasonable."
"We are on an annual subscription for McAfee MVISION Endpoint. The cost for the license could be less expensive."
"I don't think there are any extra expenses besides its licensing costs."
"Customers would need to purchase a license. If a customer purchases an MVISION Endpoint license, he may use that license to install ENS. It's a flexible license where you have the option to either use the McAfee security software or the Windows Defender managed by McAfee, which is MVISION Endpoint."
"MVISION is intended as an enterprise product and it is priced like one. This solution is within the price range of competitors at the enterprise level."
"The price of the product is similar to the ones in the market that offer the same features."
"The current pricing is much better than before because they now offer product-related promotions along with some changes in product licensing. The new pricing model is better than before."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
56%
Computer Software Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Computer Software Company
15%
Government
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between Fortinet's FortiEDR and FortiClient?
I suggest Fortinet’s FortiEDR over FortiClient for several reasons. For starters, FortiEDR guarantees solid protectio...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiEDR?
We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiEDR?
We license it per employee, so as long as the employee count remains the same, the licensing won't change. We have it...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
The cost of the solution is approximately $31,000 for three years. There are no costs above the standard licensing fee.
What needs improvement with Kaspersky Endpoint Security?
The solution could provide more frequent updates.
How does McAfee Endpoint Security compare with MVISION?
The flexible manageability of McAfee Endpoint Security is one of our favorite aspects of this solution. You can deplo...
How does Crowdstrike Falcon compare with FireEye Endpoint Security?
The Crowdstrike Falcon program has a simple to use user interface, making it both an easy to use as well as an effec...
What do you like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint?
The product's initial setup phase was straightforward.
 

Also Known As

enSilo, FortiEDR
Kaspersky Work Space Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security
McAfee MVISION Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (HX)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Financial, Healthcare, Legal, Technology, Enterprise, Manufacturing ... 
ACMS, Arqiva, Pakistan International Airlines, RAO UES
Tech Resources Limited, Globe Telecom, Rizal Commercial Banking Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.