LogicManager vs RSA Archer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

LogicManager
Ranking in GRC
23rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Data Privacy Management Software (12th)
RSA Archer
Ranking in GRC
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
IT Governance (1st), IT Vendor Risk Management (1st)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the GRC category, the market share of LogicManager is 0.3% and it decreased by 64.2% compared to the previous year. The market share of RSA Archer is 17.8% and it decreased by 18.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
GRC
Unique Categories:
Data Privacy Management Software
2.6%
IT Governance
32.9%
IT Vendor Risk Management
10.6%
 

Featured Reviews

DmitryKerov - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 22, 2022
Out of the box and ready to go with excellent support available
Our primary use case is for application performance monitoring and log aggregation. We are customers of LocigManager and I'm a software engineer.  LogicMonitor offers great support, they helped us a lot and responded very quickly. It's out of the box so once we deployed it was ready to go without…
PR
May 22, 2023
Scalable, reliable, overall great functionality, and beneficial assessments, raise dispensation for application as well as other securty controls
We use RSA Archer in my organization for assessments (ISO, GDPR, PCIDSS, etc.) or to raise dispensation for any application, security-related controls If we want to perform the application assessment or any ISMS assessment, earlier, we had to do it manually. The RSA Archer tool gives us the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Out of the box solution that doesn't require any special setup."
"It is enterprise-wide accessible. So, it is very helpful for all the employees in our bank. They can log in and do their risk management activities. It has a few inbuilt modules that are helpful for doing risk management activities, such as issue management, risk identification, risk assessment, and policy exception management. It also has some inbuilt workflows inside these modules. They are also helpful."
"RSA is a very rich application. I like its adaptive suggestion, where based on your users and the class of data, it can actually recommend you the proper control to choose. For example, we have been using PCI DSS as an NIST. So based on application feedback, it will provide you with a suggestion on which control objective needs to be set. Based on that, you can make a decision—you don't need to take the suggestion, but you can customize that particular provided suggestion. RSA Archer's workflow is also good, in terms of process automation."
"It has the best workload management features."
"Archer seamlessly integrates data systems without requiring additional software."
"This solution helped us with the centralization of our governance data, so we could house all of our controls in one place. We could use that central repository of all our controls to build our risk management strategy and our policy and governance. So we could use controls as a central library and build policy, and then build risk management around it."
"It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance."
"The most valuable features of RSA Archer are the asset management, risk management, and vendor management."
"Enables development of any application, automation of any workflow including the GRC work processes."
 

Cons

"A little too expensive."
"It's resource-hungry, that's the best way of putting it."
"There is no inbuilt alert in Archer to let us know that a data feed has failed or did not run for different reasons. So, we don't even get to know that a feed has not run until somebody reports it to us. This has been a problem all the time. Data feeds have always been a big headache for us because there is no feature to let us know if a feed has not run or has failed. If Archer had a feature to send us an email notification when a feed has failed, it would've been very helpful. This is the reason why our users are slowly moving away to another platform. Some of the modules that I have been managing are being moved to ServiceNow. Next year, a lot of our modules will be moved from RSA Archer to ServiceNow, and the data feed issue has been one of the main reasons."
"I find the tech support to be inadequately knowledgeable."
"GUI could be improved."
"Some of the error reporting isn't very clear. When you're looking for information on error codes, you got to do a lot of digging."
"The first improvement I would suggest for RSA Archer is a better search feature. The search criteria needs to be improved. Sometimes I do a search and the search doesn't return the exact item I'm looking for. RSA Archer could also be improved by being more user-friendly. Maybe I have been using a limited version of RSA Archer, but I'm not sure whether it has ESG, environmental and social governance. In the next couple of years, ESG is the next feature that will be integrated into GRC tools. I would recommend RSA Archer adds ESG."
"I would like to see real-time data, from vulnerabilities, and threats."
"The ticket handling process could be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The price of RSA Archer is good. The price isn't too high considering it is a leading tool in the market."
"The solution is not at all a cheap product."
"As I am a developer and responsible for providing production support, I do not have personal knowledge of the pricing. However, my colleagues claim that it is very expensive in comparison with other tools."
"At the higher end of the price scale, but provides better, more accessible functionality and customization than cheaper products."
"I am not 100% familiar with that, especially with their new model. I just know that the way they've licensed per user to scale is good."
"The price of the solution is very affordable."
"The pricing is okay. The licensing costs are very reasonable; it is very affordable to us."
"The license is costly for the solution, but the remaining set up and maintenance is quite cheaper."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
59%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
5%
Insurance Company
4%
Educational Organization
46%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
5%
Manufacturing Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about RSA Archer?
It has various valuable features. For example, showing us if a control aligns with specific standards or frameworks helps us understand it better and verify its compliance.
What needs improvement with RSA Archer?
The user interface needs work. There are many small text boxes, like credit card size's boxes, where we need to input a lot of text. You can't see what you're typing beyond the tiny window, so you ...
What is your primary use case for RSA Archer?
We primarily use the system control module and specific IT control models for ongoing risk assessment activities. We use it on a day-to-day basis.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Archer
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

First Marblehead Corporation, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Hawaii, University Hospitals, Corporate One FCU, Casella Waste Systems, Bank of Stockton, Vina Capital Group, C1 Bank, DentaQuest
T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
Find out what your peers are saying about RSA, AuditBoard, Trend Micro and others in GRC. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.