We performed a comparison between Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management and Microsoft Intune based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"The ability to switch between Affinity and non-Affinity enrollment is great."
"The dashboards, the security, and the customization capabilities work very well for us."
"Application deployment and keeping the devices secure no matter where they are, by having this cloud solution — that has been great."
"It's really easy to access."
"With on-premises Active Directory, the main challenge was that we had no control when a user was working from home. We didn't know what exactly a user was doing and whether the AV was up to date or not. Intune provides better control of their machines."
"The features I found most valuable in Intune are its user visibility and troubleshooting options."
"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"There are a few security features that are not available in Microsoft Intune, when compared to other products."
"It needs certificate provisioning for S/MIME purposes."
"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."
"The reporting and cost have room for improvement."
"For an existing customer who has an SCCM, it would need to be upgraded to an MECM first before I can introduce Microsoft Intune."
"There is no catalog for mobile access management (MAM) security."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see some kind of analytics report."
"The feature that allows us to import the business application from the configuration manager to Intune is not very good at this time."
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is ranked 10th in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 2 reviews while Microsoft Intune is ranked 1st in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 166 reviews. Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Intune is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Intune writes "We can manage all aspects of our devices from a single console, easy to scale, and quick to deploy". Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central, whereas Microsoft Intune is most compared with Jamf Pro, VMware Workspace ONE, ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Microsoft Entra ID and SOTI MobiControl. See our Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management vs. Microsoft Intune report.
See our list of best Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) vendors and best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.