SUSE NeuVector vs Trend Vision One - Cloud Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 4, 2023
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Container Security
6th
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (5th), Cloud and Data Center Security (7th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (5th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (5th), Compliance Management (4th)
SUSE NeuVector
Ranking in Container Security
20th
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
15th
Average Rating
7.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Trend Vision One - Cloud Se...
Ranking in Container Security
8th
Ranking in Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
7th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (12th), GRC (3rd), Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (9th), Anti-Malware Tools (8th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (6th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (6th)
 

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Container Security category, the market share of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.7% and it increased by 60.7% compared to the previous year. The market share of SUSE NeuVector is 3.7% and it decreased by 30.1% compared to the previous year. The market share of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is 0.8% and it decreased by 47.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security
Unique Categories:
Vulnerability Management
1.8%
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
1.3%
Application Security Tools
0.0%
GRC
0.3%
 

Featured Reviews

PRATHAMESH SHASHIKANT MOHITE - PeerSpot reviewer
May 13, 2024
Provides automated security responses, is effective for threat management, and saves us costs
Singularity Cloud Security was convenient and effective for threat management. In the past, we relied on daily information gathering and alerts, requiring us to manually address the findings. Now, Singularity Cloud Security provides continuous threat detection and simplifies our work, significantly improving our security posture. The automated security responses have significantly improved our overall security posture. Singularity Cloud Security is easy to use as it gives us the proper step-by-step methods to solve that vulnerability. I would rate the evidence-based reporting for helping prioritize and solve important cloud security issues nine out of ten. It is helpful that Singularity Cloud Security includes proof of exploitability in the evidence-based reporting. Although it isn't perfect, it gives us the right solution to mitigate vulnerability. Our infrastructure configuration is defined using an Infrastructure as Code template. This template allows us to scan our entire infrastructure for potential issues, including pre-production problems within templates or container configuration files. Previously, we stored infrastructure details in a format that required manual data retrieval via CSV files. Now, with IaC, we have a centralized control system that manages multiple accounts and provides vulnerability listings based on severity for each account. Our previous default AWS security tool wasn't sufficient, so we adopted Singularity Cloud Security based on a client recommendation. It's been a huge improvement. Whereas our old tool took three months to gather data, Singularity Cloud Security provides a daily updated dashboard with vulnerability information. This allows us to prioritize and address security risks based on criticality, saving us significant time and effort compared to the past. Singularity Cloud Security has helped reduce the number of false positives by 70 percent. Singularity Cloud Security streamlines manual work by providing insightful information on security vulnerabilities. It not only identifies issues we might miss but also offers in-depth analysis, including potential future costs and the severity of the threat. Additionally, it presents basic details tailored for users with less security expertise, empowering them to understand and address vulnerabilities effectively. Singularity Cloud Security has improved our risk posture by 80 percent and has reduced our mean time to detection by 85 percent. Singularity Cloud Security has reduced our mean time to remediation by 70 percent. It has streamlined collaboration between our cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams. This tool automates manual tasks, reducing our team size from ten to five. It provides us with the information we need to effectively identify and address vulnerabilities, making our cloud environment more secure. It has been a huge time-saver for our engineering team, saving them weeks of work. We have saved around 70 percent of our overall time with Singularity Cloud Security. Singularity Cloud Security has positively impacted our operational costs. The time saved by reducing manual work and resource requirements translates directly into cost savings. Singularity Cloud Security's AI empowers us with improved security solutions. When faced with uncertainty, the tool can quickly provide insights to help us gain a clear understanding of the situation.
WL
Aug 11, 2023
A Cloud-based Solution for the network inspection, visualization, and security needed for dynamic container environments
I used it to monitor the long-time events The solution enhances the organization as it safeguards against various types of malware through anti-malware, which we use once a few days. The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable.      The image-scanning features need…
KS
Sep 26, 2023
Helps organizations understand their environment better, but it doesn't show violations for specific compliances
We implemented Trend Vision One - Cloud Security to enhance our security and visibility into different cloud networks, especially on AWS. We deal with different environments, storage, and S3 buckets. We wanted to ensure we have full visibility of file-based threats, network threats, and any misconfigurations we may have when a new environment is being spun out. We can detect crypto mining easily, see what's going on, and block it. Lastly, we use the tool to focus on compliance because we need to stay compliant. The tool really helps drive our compliance information and deliver requirements to auditors and other regulatory organizations that need necessary information from us. The biggest jump has been on the compliance side. We actively see the vulnerabilities, the third-party package issues, misconfigurations, and network threats. The solution is helping us get the information and do the remediation to achieve compliance. We do SOC 2 and PCI. We are able to drive our vulnerability management program well.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The user-friendly dashboard offers both convenience and security by providing quick access to solutions and keeping us informed of potential threats."
"It is scalable, stable, and can detect any threat on a machine. It uses artificial intelligence and can lock down any virus."
"It used to guide me about an alert. There is something called an alert guide. I used to click on the alert guide, and I could read everything. I could read about the alert and how to resolve it. I used to love that feature."
"We use the infrastructure as code scanning, which is good."
"There's real-time threat detection. It can show threats and find issues based on their severity and helps us with real-time monitoring."
"The visibility PingSafe provides into the Cloud environment is a valuable feature."
"The offensive security where they do a fix is valuable. They go to a misconfiguration and provide detailed alerts on what could be there. They also provide a remediation feature where if we give the permission, they can also go and fix the issue."
"The solution helped free other staff to work on other projects or other tasks. We basically just had to do a bunch of upfront configuring. With it, we do not have to spend as much time in the console."
"The tool's deployment is simple. Also, I am impressed with its risk capabilities."
"The UI has a lot of features."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security."
"When it comes to the price, we got a really good deal from the vendor instantly."
"The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is the performance, deployment, and cost."
"The features of image scanning and anti-malware are really valuable."
"The initial setup is quite good, it's straightforward."
"The most valuable part of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is its dashboard, as it's simple. It's easy to manage, and you can better control the solution."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"The tech support is excellent. They really know their products. They also know a lot of about the integrations between different solutions."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"It has the best EDR functionality for cloud and typical endpoints."
"The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
 

Cons

"There should be more documentation about the product."
"I'd like to see better onboarding documentation."
"Cloud Native Security's reporting could be better. We are unable to see which images are impacted. Several thousand images have been deployed, so if we can see some application-specific information in the dashboard, we can directly send that report to the team that owns the application. We'd also like the option to download the report from the portal instead of waiting for the report to be sent to our email."
"A beneficial improvement for PingSafe would be integration with Jira, allowing for a more streamlined ticketing system."
"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."
"I would like PingSafe to add real-time detection of vulnerabilities and cloud misconfigurations."
"Whenever I view the processes and the process aspect, it takes a long time to load."
"We are experiencing problems with Cloud Native Security reporting."
"SUSE NeuVector could improve by increasing its visibility into other elements of the DevSecOps pipeline. Additionally, scanning around infrastructure would be helpful."
"SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning."
"I would say that this solution should improve monitoring and reporting. I would also like to see more integrations so that we could essentially make it a part of a developing pipeline."
"The documentation needs to improve a bit."
"We are also working with IaaS VMS, but NeuVector doesn't support virtual machines."
"The tool should offer seamless integration of other security tools while in a hybrid environment."
"The image-scanning features need improvement."
"Securing S3 using Trend Vision One - Cloud Security can cost too much. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security has a tool that requires lots of privileges. From my understanding, it's only for static application testing, so they need to add dynamic application testing, and there should be more collaboration with the application testing tools on the market. We have not used this product, and I don't know if they plan to decommission it or something. They should focus on application security because this tool's unique feature is multi-cloud support. However, they should improve integration with tools for these kinds of use cases, especially application security and dynamic scanning. For example, I would like it to support Dell SecureOps. I'd also like to see some enhancements to API gateway security."
"The initial setup is easy for someone who operates container platforms on a daily basis. However, it could be difficult for those coming purely from informational security or another field of an IT."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The pricing can get high."
"The dashboard should be a bit more intuitive."
"One area for improvement in Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is marketing; in particular, Trend Vision should update the marketing documentation. The information needs to be more comprehensive."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security seems to have a preference for AWS Cloud over Azure and would be improved by focusing equally on both."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is cheap."
"The features included in PingSafe justify its price point."
"Its pricing is okay. It is in line with what other providers were providing. It is not cheap. It is not expensive."
"PingSafe falls within the typical price range for cloud security platforms."
"Its pricing is constant. It has been constant over the previous year, so I am happy with it. However, price distribution can be better explained. That is the only area I am worried about. Otherwise, the pricing is very reasonable."
"PingSafe is less expensive than other options."
"I wasn't sure what to expect from the pricing, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a little less than I thought."
"Their pricing appears to be based simply on the number of accounts we have, which is common for cloud-based products."
"The price of SUSE NeuVector is low. There is an additional cost for support."
"SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution."
"The solution's pricing could be better. The cost of a subscription is calculated on the basis of work."
"Licensing fees are paid yearly."
"While Trend Vision One - Cloud Security was a cost-effective solution for us in 2021, we've noticed a recent price increase that makes it less affordable."
"Pricing for Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security in the corporate market is okay."
"It's a slightly expensive product."
"The is price is 25% cheaper than it was a couple of years ago, which is good."
"One year ago, Trend transitioned to a credit system for licensing, which has confused users."
"The pricing for Cloud One is reasonable because my costs scale up and down based on my infrastructure usage."
"The price could be lower. That is a bit of a consideration."
"With everything I deal with, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is somewhere in the middle."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
21%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Insurance Company
4%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
27%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
4%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
When I joined my organization, I saw that PingSafe was already implemented. I started to use the tool's alerting feat...
What do you like most about NeuVector?
The most valuable feature of SUSE NeuVector is its run-time security.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NeuVector?
SUSE NeuVector is an open-source solution. You have to pay for the support.
What needs improvement with NeuVector?
SUSE NeuVector should provide more security protection rules and better container image scanning.
What do you like most about Trend Micro Cloud One Workload Security?
The the most valuable feature is the scanning engine. It does not impact server performance. It's very lightweight.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro Cloud One Workload Security?
The is price is 25% cheaper than it was a couple of years ago, which is good.
What needs improvement with Trend Micro Cloud One Workload Security?
The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and no...
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
NeuVector
Trend Micro Cloud One , Cloud One Workload Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Container Security, Trend Micro Cloud One Application Security, Cloud One File Storage Security, Cloud One Network Security, Cloud One Conformity
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Figo, Clear Review, Arvato Bertelsmann, Experian, Chime
Find out what your peers are saying about SUSE NeuVector vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.