We performed a comparison between Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Cloud One based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Ease of Deployment: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has an easy setup with clear instructions and helpful engineers. Deployment is seamless, although the time may vary. On the other hand, Trend Micro Cloud One's setup can be difficult and time-consuming, requiring daily monitoring and maintenance, and it can take anywhere from a few hours to a month.
Features: Prisma Cloud offers a management console, compliance monitoring, and micro-segmentation, as well as auto-remediation capabilities and vulnerability scanning. Trend Micro Cloud One has excellent vulnerability protection and login inspection, as well as control over server access and application installation, and good workload management. Prisma Cloud needs more customizable dashboards, better automation, better coverage for GCP and Oracle, and improved support. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One needs improvements in pricing, Azure support, automation, robustness, initial setup, and alerts.
Pricing: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks has a convoluted credit-based pricing model that can be difficult to comprehend, although it is deemed pricey, it is deemed a good investment for safeguarding multi-cloud setups. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One's pricing is in the mid-range and can be paid monthly, quarterly, or yearly. While extra services may accumulate, the overall cost is seen as fair and has even decreased by 25% in recent times.
Service and Support: Prisma Cloud has received mixed reviews, with some customers praising their technical support and account managers, while others experienced slow response times. Meanwhile, Trend Micro Cloud One has generally received positive feedback for their knowledgeable and responsive support team.
ROI: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks provides better risk clarity, faster issue detection, improved compliance, and increased productivity compared to Trend Micro Cloud One. However, Trend Micro Cloud One is more flexible and easier to integrate.
Comparison Results: Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is the preferred option over Trend Micro Cloud One based on user reviews. Prisma Cloud offers a wider range of features, including continuous cloud compliance monitoring, network security, and identity-based micro-segmentation, and provides a single pane of glass for multi- and hybrid-cloud environments.
"Our most important features are those around entitlement, external exposure, vulnerabilities, and container security."
"I like Wiz's reporting, and it's easy to do queries. For example, it's pretty simple to find out how many servers we have and the applications installed on each. I like Wiz's security graph because you can use it to see the whole organization even if you have multiple accounts."
"Out of all the features, the one item that has been most valuable is the fact that Wiz puts into context all the pieces that create an issue, and applies a particular risk evaluation that helps us prioritize when we need to address a misconfiguration, vulnerability, or any issue that would put our environment into risk."
"The vulnerability management modules and the discovery and inventory are the most valuable features. Before using Wiz, it was a very manual process for both. After implementing it, we're able to get all of the analytics into a single platform that gives us visibility across all the systems in our cloud. We're able to correspond and understand what the vulnerability landscape looks like a lot faster."
"The CSPM module has been the most effective. It was easy to deploy and covered all our accounts through APIs, requiring no agents. Wiz provides instant visibility into high-level risks that we need to address."
"The automation roles are essential because we ultimately want to do less work and automate more. The dashboards are easy to read and visually pleasing. You can understand things quickly, which makes it easy for our other teams. The network and infrastructure teams don't know as much about security as we do, so it helps to have a tool that's accessible and nice to look at."
"The solution is very user-friendly."
"The first thing that stood out was the ease of installation and the quick value we got out of the solution."
"Technical support is quite helpful."
"The ability to monitor the artifact repository is one of the most valuable features because we have a disparate set of development processes, but everything tends to land in a common set of artifact repositories. The solution gives us a single point where we can apply security control for monitoring. That's really helpful."
"The most valuable features of Prisma Cloud are its cloud security posture management and cloud workload protection capabilities."
"Configuration monitoring and alerting is the most valuable feature; it happens at the cloud's speed, allowing our development team to respond quickly. If a configuration goes against our security best practices, we're alerted promptly and can act to resolve the issue. As cloud security staff, we're not staring at the cloud all the time, and we want to let the developers do their jobs so that our company is protected and work is proceeding within our security controls."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability monitoring, serverless access, container runtime features, and Defender."
"The first aspect that is important is the fact that Prisma Cloud is cloud-agnostic. It's actually available for the five top cloud providers: AWS, GCP, Azure, Oracle, and Alibaba Cloud. The second aspect is the fact that we can write our own rules to try to detect misconfigurations in those environments."
"Prisma scans things and shows all the vulnerabilities and packages that are vulnerable, and which layers, by default, have vulnerabilities. So developers can easily go into the package or a particular layer and make changes to their code. It's very transparent."
"The most valuable feature of Prisma Cloud is WAF (web application firewall)."
"Detection response and cloud conformity are valuable features."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security does not utilize a lot of resources which allows our users to keep working even during a scan."
"The most valuable features are intrusion prevention and anti-malware capabilities."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security's best features are security analysis, remote access security, and driver security."
"The storage and computing features are valuable."
"The product helps us understand our environment better."
"The stability is quite good."
"Vision One is versatile and can be integrated with many SIEMs. You're not limited to only one SIEM, such as Microsoft Sentinel. The API integrations are seamless, and we have all the documentation needed to integrate Vision One via API."
"Given the level of visibility into all the cloud environments Wiz provides, it would be nice if they could integrate some kind of mechanism to better manage tenants on multiple platforms. For example, let's say that some servers don't have an application they need, such as an antivirus. Wiz could include an API or something to push those applications out to the servers. It would be great if you could remedy these issues directly from the Wiz platform."
"We're looking at some of the data compliance stuff that they've got Jon offer. I know they're looking at container security, which we gonna be looking at next."
"The remediation workflow within the Wiz could be improved."
"The only thing that needs to be improved is the number of scans per day."
"One significant issue is that the searches are case-sensitive, so finding a misconfigured resource can become very challenging."
"We would like to see improvements to executive-level reporting and data reporting in general, which we understand is being rolled out to the platform."
"The only small pain point has been around some of the logging integrations. Some of the complexities of the script integrations aren't supported with some of the more automated infrastructure components. So, it's not as universal. For example, they have great support for cloud formation and other services, but if you're using another type of management utility or governance language for your infrastructure-as-code automation components, it becomes a little bit trickier to navigate that."
"The reporting isn't that great. They have executive summaries, but it's only a compliance report that maps all current issues to specific controls. Whether you look at one subscription or project, regardless of the size, you will get a multipage report on how the issues in that account map to that control. Our CSO isn't going to read through that. He won't filter that out or show that to his leadership and say, "Here's what we're doing." It isn't a helpful report. They're working on it, but it's a poor executive summary."
"They need to make the settings more flexible to fit our internal policies about data. We didn't want developers to see some data, but we wanted them to have access to the console because it was going to help them... It was a pain to have to set up the access to some languages and some data."
"Sometimes we do get false alerts. That should be improved."
"It can be too expensive for small companies."
"A better correlation between the multiple products Prisma Cloud contains would be crucial. It would reduce the time spent looking at reports and enable you to get all the actionable insights across products. I think that Palo Alto is working on it, but they need to work faster because it doesn't make sense to have all these products in a single pane of glass without any correlation between them."
"It's not really on par with, or catering to, what other products are looking at in terms of SAST and DAST capabilities. For those, you'd probably go to the market and look at something like Veracode or WhiteHat."
"One of the main backlogs in their development is in the area of integration. For example, we have ServiceNow in place for ticket management and Prisma Cloud is supposed to send closure emails for incidents. But from time to time, it fails to do so. We have several other mismatches between Prisma Cloud and ServiceNow."
"The UI is the worst."
"I have some challenges customizing and personalizing some of the capabilities in the CSPM in terms of new policies and services. We have to reconfigure and rebuild the CSPM."
"The workbook insights generate a massive list, making it inconvenient to review."
"The local agent should be able to show more logs. At present, the logs are only available from the web console and not from the local agent."
"There are also some loopholes because it's a new product that they have recently migrated to the cloud. We do see some issues with the policies we have assigned when it comes to a particular account. There are some issues with system support, such as a particular server kernel version that is not supported."
"The firewall configuration should have been automated based on the understanding of the application, utilities, and protocols."
"They should provide a way for users to see violations for specific compliance."
"The initial setup can be complex for the inexperienced."
"The pricing can get high."
"Trend Vision One - Cloud Security should address threats automatically without having user input."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Pricing and Cost Advice →
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 82 reviews while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is ranked 8th in Container Security with 17 reviews. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4, while Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One - Cloud Security writes "We can quickly deploy cloud conformity, provides good visibility, and control". Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security and AWS GuardDuty, whereas Trend Vision One - Cloud Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Cloud, AWS GuardDuty, Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration, AWS Security Hub and Orca Security. See our Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors, best Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) vendors, and best Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
