TFS vs Zeenyx AscentialTest comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

TFS
Ranking in Test Management Tools
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (3rd)
Zeenyx AscentialTest
Ranking in Test Management Tools
10th
Average Rating
9.4
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (19th)
 

Featured Reviews

SJ
May 5, 2023
Has good performance, but the initial setup process needs to be simpler
We use the solution to store all the code and designs for software version control The solution helps us store multiple software versions as it evolves and develops. All the essential functions of the solution perform well. The solution's pricing and setup process needs improvement. I have…
Tobias Roth - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 3, 2024
Robust automation with reusable steps and seamless integration
The concept of reusable steps in Zeenyx AscentialTest has significantly enhanced our test automation efficiency. Encapsulating common actions into modular steps reduces redundancy in test scripts and ensures consistency across scenarios. This approach streamlines maintenance efforts, allowing updates to be applied universally, making our test suite more agile and adaptable to evolving project requirements. The concept of reusable steps is a key factor in maximizing reusability and maintainability in our test automation strategy. AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows. This capability ensures precise interaction with various components of an application's interface, further enhancing the reliability and effectiveness of our automated tests.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of TFS is the central repository, and you can see what changes other developers did from which branch."
"Work item management integration with source control."
"The most valuable features of TFS are bug reporting and its high performance."
"Microsoft's technical team is supportive."
"We use TFS for forecast management."
"The biggest value-add is the solution integrates well with most Microsoft products."
"It's an integrated system that includes all the information that we need to deliver our products smoothly and to track the progress of each piece of code."
"What I like the most is that you can set permissions on just one folder."
"AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows."
"It’s been really easy to automate the same application TestComplete struggled with. I have been able to automate two of our key applications in just a few months. I haven’t even taken their training."
"If you use the PowerBuilder application, do choose AscentialTest without thinking twice."
"The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder."
 

Cons

"We are also using Microsoft Teams. The two products function separately. There is not enough collaboration between Microsoft Teams and TFS."
"In the next release, I would like them to include integration for various projects, similar to what JIRA has, and they could create this feature on the dashboard."
"Currently, we are looking for a solution with which we can incorporate third-party development sites or third-party project teams into the system. Because it is on-premise, it is a bit problematic because we need to have a VPN or something else in the system. A cloud-based solution would be better for us, and that's what we are looking for. Our biggest problem is the external connection, which, of course, is limited by our own IT. It would be good to have some kind of publishing service for this external connection. It might be there, and it might be that our IT is making it impossible for us. Its template editor could be easier to use. Currently, customizing the project templates according to your needs requires some work."
"There should be management of the project built-in."
"I would like to see the reporting features expanded so that I can see details on the users connected to all of the projects."
"This solution is quite old and it is already being bundled as Azure DevOps Server."
"As an end-user, I expect the solution's performance to be faster while staying as stable as possible."
"The dashboard and the customization of dashboards is an area they have to work on."
"I would like to see an improvement in the User Interface."
"Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot."
"Streamlining the retrieval of results from individual test set runs would be beneficial."
"The only thing I can't wait for is for Zeenyx to add automating Mobile apps."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not in a position to comment on the licensing terms, as we are talking about an enterprise arrangement."
"Use the Microsoft recommended “seat-based” licensing model. This allows a single developer with multiple machines to consume only one client license."
"The solution is expensive."
"The overall price of TFS is good."
"It is an expensive solution."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly."
"TFS is on the higher side, but if you intend to use the tool as a complete ALM tool, it will reduce your costs in the long run."
"There is a yearly licensing fee that needs to be paid."
"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
53%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Energy/Utilities Company
14%
Government
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Healthcare Company
12%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?
TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...
What do you like most about TFS?
Microsoft's technical team is supportive.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TFS?
There is a yearly licensing fee that needs to be paid.
What do you like most about Zeenyx AscentialTest?
AscentialTest's object recognition in snapshots is a robust feature that goes beyond standard elements, even accurately identifying objects within Datawindows.
What needs improvement with Zeenyx AscentialTest?
While Zeenyx AscentialTest has proven to be a valuable asset in our testing processes, there are areas where improvements could enhance the overall user experience. One notable aspect is the user i...
What is your primary use case for Zeenyx AscentialTest?
We use AscentialTest for automated testing of Powerbuilder applications via CI/CD pipeline with GitLab. We have fully integrated all tests in our CI/CD pipeline. Thanks to the integration, much wor...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Team Foundation Server
AscentialTest
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Vendex KBB IT Services, Info Support, Fujitsu Consulting, TCSC, Airways New Zealand, HP
TJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.
Find out what your peers are saying about TFS vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest and other solutions. Updated: June 2024.
787,061 professionals have used our research since 2012.