Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo

Top 10 Microsoft Defender for Cloud Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Microsoft Defender for Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Defender for Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Wiz, and SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft Defender for Cloud surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive threat protection, seamless cloud integration, advanced alerts, and unified security management that enhances operational efficiency and ensures robust data security across multi-cloud and on-premises environments.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Cloudflare
4.3 out of 5
Cloudflare excels in CDN services with automation and configurable caching for enhancing site performance. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates with Azure for robust threat intelligence and compliance management, appealing to tech buyers focused on comprehensive security within Microsoft's ecosystem.
Download Cloudflare vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud involves a more complex pricing structure. Cloudflare's pricing is simpler compared to the tiered approach of Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare offers a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud involves a more complex pricing structure. Cloudflare's pricing is simpler compared to the tiered approach of Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Wiz
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates well within Azure, offering daily security recommendations and AI-driven insights. In comparison, Wiz features contextual risk evaluation and a Security Graph, providing users with key capabilities to identify and prioritize critical issues swiftly.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Wiz Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud incurs a higher setup cost with a detailed integration process, while Wiz offers a lower setup cost with a simpler implementation. This highlights the cost-effective and efficient onboarding of Wiz compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud incurs a higher setup cost with a detailed integration process, while Wiz offers a lower setup cost with a simpler implementation. This highlights the cost-effective and efficient onboarding of Wiz compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers extensive integration with Microsoft services, ideal for enterprises in the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security excels in remote workforce support, appealing to organizations seeking a straightforward solution with strong threat detection and visibility.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a moderate setup cost, providing cost-effective security measures, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers advanced features with a higher setup cost, reflecting a premium approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a moderate setup cost, providing cost-effective security measures, while SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers advanced features with a higher setup cost, reflecting a premium approach.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive monitoring features like custom metrics, while Microsoft Defender focuses on cloud security management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender excels in security across multi-cloud platforms, making Datadog ideal for monitoring enthusiasts and Microsoft Defender suitable for security-focused buyers.
Download Datadog vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Datadog requires a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog requires a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which offers more budget-friendly initial pricing.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Snyk
4.1 out of 5
Snyk emphasizes seamless integration into developer workflows with strong vulnerability management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides extensive security posture management across multiple platforms. Snyk focuses on ease of use, while Microsoft Defender offers broad infrastructure coverage suitable for varied cloud environments.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Snyk Report
Snyk has a more straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires higher setup investment, emphasizing its comprehensive security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Snyk has a more straightforward setup process with lower initial costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires higher setup investment, emphasizing its comprehensive security features.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Cloud offers advanced security features like automated forensics and seamless AWS integration, appealing to those needing robust protection. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides cost-effective solutions with strong Azure integration, attracting users within the Microsoft ecosystem seeking comprehensive compliance and CSPM capabilities.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks often has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, highlighting a noticeable difference in upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks often has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, highlighting a noticeable difference in upfront expenses.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Darktrace
4.1 out of 5
Darktrace excels in AI-driven threat detection with fast response and comprehensive visibility across networks. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers robust integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, delivering multi-cloud protection and detailed security recommendations.
Download Darktrace vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Darktrace has a lower initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which requires a higher investment upfront. Despite the difference in setup costs, both products provide substantial security features tailored to their specific capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Darktrace has a lower initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which requires a higher investment upfront. Despite the difference in setup costs, both products provide substantial security features tailored to their specific capabilities.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Checkmarx One
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Checkmarx One
3.9 out of 5
Checkmarx One offers robust code scanning and secure coding tools, focusing on comprehensive language support and vulnerability identification. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in integrated security management across multi-cloud environments and advanced threat detection, ideal for enterprises seeking holistic cloud security.
Download Checkmarx One vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Checkmarx One offers a straightforward setup with minimal upfront costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a more complex installation process with potentially higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Checkmarx One offers a straightforward setup with minimal upfront costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a more complex installation process with potentially higher initial expenses.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Veracode
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Veracode
4.0 out of 5
Veracode excels in static code analysis and AppSec integrations for DevOps workflows, appealing to developers focused on secure software composition. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud targets comprehensive threat protection for hybrid environments, benefiting businesses leveraging Azure and multi-cloud architectures.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Veracode Report
Veracode's setup cost is higher, offering extensive security measures, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a more cost-effective setup with a focus on integration and threat detection.
View comparison
Pricing
Veracode's setup cost is higher, offering extensive security measures, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a more cost-effective setup with a focus on integration and threat detection.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Qualys VMDR
4.2 out of 5
Qualys VMDR offers detailed vulnerability management and prioritization, ideal for precise security analysis. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud integrates with Azure for broader threat detection, offering seamless cloud-native security features tailored for Azure environments, appealing to tech buyers seeking comprehensive cloud integration.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Qualys VMDR Report
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud often requires more investment upfront. Qualys VMDR tends to be more cost-effective initially compared to the potentially higher setup expenses with Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
View comparison
Pricing
Qualys VMDR has a straightforward initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud often requires more investment upfront. Qualys VMDR tends to be more cost-effective initially compared to the potentially higher setup expenses with Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides seamless Azure integration and advanced threat detection, ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, Varonis Platform excels in data access governance, offering insights into user behavior, appealing to enterprises focused on data security and compliance.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Varonis Platform Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires minimal initial setup costs, offering an accessible start, whereas Varonis Platform involves higher setup expenses suitable for comprehensive data protection capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires minimal initial setup costs, offering an accessible start, whereas Varonis Platform involves higher setup expenses suitable for comprehensive data protection capabilities.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium offers strong endpoint management and control over networks, appealing for environments needing real-time data retrieval. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides seamless integration with Azure services, appealing to organizations that prioritize comprehensive cloud-focused features and straightforward deployment.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Tanium Report
Tanium includes a high setup cost with its extensive features, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium includes a high setup cost with its extensive features, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Red Hat OpenShift
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Red Hat OpenShift
4.2 out of 5

Red Hat OpenShift enhances application development with container orchestration, scalability, and security, supporting microservices and CI/CD. It benefits various environments with quick deployment, resource optimization, and resilience. Users appreciate its Kubernetes compatibility, robust GUI, and ease in managing multi-cloud. Challenges include documentation, user-friendly configuration, and cloud integration.

Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Red Hat OpenShift Report
Pricing of OpenShift depends on the number of nodes and who is hosting it.
Depending on the extent of the product use, licenses are available for a range of time periods, and are renewable at the end of the period.
View comparison
Pricing
Pricing of OpenShift depends on the number of nodes and who is hosting it.
Depending on the extent of the product use, licenses are available for a range of time periods, and are renewable at the end of the period.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Tenable Nessus
4.2 out of 5
Tenable Nessus excels in on-premises vulnerability scanning and offers value for small to medium businesses. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides comprehensive cloud-native security within Azure, ideal for enterprises seeking dynamic insights. Both offer cost-effective solutions tailored to different security environments.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Tenable Nessus Report
Tenable Nessus offers cost-effective setup compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which can be pricier with more complex integration.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Nessus offers cost-effective setup compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which can be pricier with more complex integration.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
AWS GuardDuty
4.1 out of 5
AWS GuardDuty excels in threat detection with integrated AWS services, ideal for AWS environments seeking cost-effective security. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud supports multi-cloud with advanced policy recommendations, suitable for enterprises needing comprehensive protection across varied environments.
Download AWS GuardDuty vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
AWS GuardDuty fees are typically low with no upfront setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud involves potentially higher setup costs, depending on the specific configuration and requirements, making this a key differentiator between the two services.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS GuardDuty fees are typically low with no upfront setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud involves potentially higher setup costs, depending on the specific configuration and requirements, making this a key differentiator between the two services.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security
4.1 out of 5
With robust integration within Azure, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers comprehensive security. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat detection and real-time response. Defender's Azure integration appeals to those on that platform, while CrowdStrike offers strong multi-cloud support.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers an affordable initial setup process, while CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security requires a higher investment upfront, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers an affordable initial setup process, while CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security requires a higher investment upfront, highlighting a key cost difference between the two solutions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Illumio
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Illumio
4.1 out of 5
Illumio is valued for its adaptive segmentation and mapping, offering cost-effective security. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides comprehensive protection with seamless Microsoft service integration, making it ideal for those seeking a broader security feature set despite higher initial costs.
Download Illumio vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Illumio features a lower upfront setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which involves higher initial expenses. This cost difference may influence initial budget considerations for users evaluating these security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Illumio features a lower upfront setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which involves higher initial expenses. This cost difference may influence initial budget considerations for users evaluating these security solutions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
JFrog Xray
3.9 out of 5
JFrog Xray excels in DevOps vulnerability analysis, prioritizing open source insights. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides comprehensive threat protection across numerous platforms. A tech buyer might choose JFrog for pipeline security, while Microsoft Defender appeals for its extensive cloud management and security features.
Download JFrog Xray vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
JFrog Xray's setup cost is straightforward and predictable, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a more complex and potentially variable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
JFrog Xray's setup cost is straightforward and predictable, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a more complex and potentially variable setup.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
AWS Security Hub
3.8 out of 5
AWS Security Hub is favored for AWS integration, compliance checks, and pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels with advanced threat protection, supporting diverse environments. Tech buyers might choose AWS for affordability and support, while Microsoft appeals for comprehensive features and cross-platform integration.
Download AWS Security Hub vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
AWS Security Hub setup is typically cost-effective and streamlined, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud may involve higher initial setup costs. AWS prioritizes ease of implementation, while Microsoft Defender emphasizes robust security features.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS Security Hub setup is typically cost-effective and streamlined, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud may involve higher initial setup costs. AWS prioritizes ease of implementation, while Microsoft Defender emphasizes robust security features.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation
4.1 out of 5
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation excels in micro-segmentation with visibility and policy flexibility, suitable for detailed audits and internal traffic management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers strong threat detection and multi-cloud integration, ideal for Microsoft ecosystem users seeking comprehensive security.
Download Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which is often considered more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Akamai may offer advanced features justifying the cost disparity.
View comparison
Pricing
Akamai Guardicore Segmentation has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender for Cloud, which is often considered more budget-friendly for initial deployment. Akamai may offer advanced features justifying the cost disparity.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Tenable Security Center
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Security Center offers robust vulnerability scanning and policy flexibility, ideal for those prioritizing on-premises integration. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides strong threat management within Azure's ecosystem, catering to organizations utilizing cloud environments and seeking integrated security solutions across multi-cloud infrastructures.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Tenable Security Center Report
Tenable Security Center setup costs are generally higher due to its comprehensive suite of features, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more cost-effective setup, emphasizing affordability and streamlined integration into existing Microsoft services.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Security Center setup costs are generally higher due to its comprehensive suite of features, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more cost-effective setup, emphasizing affordability and streamlined integration into existing Microsoft services.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform
4.2 out of 5
Red Hat OpenShift offers auto scalability and integration with IT infrastructures, ideal for enterprise environments focused on container management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides multi-cloud support and threat detection, catering to organizations prioritizing comprehensive security insights and regulatory compliance.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform Report
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform has high initial setup costs, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform has high initial setup costs, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Orca Security
4.5 out of 5
Orca Security offers intuitive agentless deployment and efficient cloud visibility, ideal for straightforward monitoring. In comparison, Microsoft's Defender for Cloud provides robust integration with Microsoft products, making it suitable for comprehensive multi-cloud security in ecosystems reliant on Microsoft solutions.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Orca Security Report
Orca Security has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more complex pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Orca Security has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more complex pricing model.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration and scalability, appealing to enterprises seeking robust log searching and customization capabilities. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud emphasizes security and compliance, ideal for those prioritizing multi-cloud protection and seamless Azure service integration.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers flexible setup costs suited for dynamic scaling, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a lower initial setup cost focused on immediate security needs, highlighting a trade-off between scalability and immediate implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers flexible setup costs suited for dynamic scaling, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a lower initial setup cost focused on immediate security needs, highlighting a trade-off between scalability and immediate implementation.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Tenable Vulnerability Management
4.1 out of 5
Tenable Vulnerability Management excels in integration and monitoring across environments, appealing to businesses seeking robust security and operational efficiency. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud's comprehensive features suit those needing strong security posture and compliance across multi-cloud environments.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Tenable Vulnerability Management Report
Tenable Vulnerability Management offers a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud incurs a higher initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Tenable Vulnerability Management offers a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud incurs a higher initial setup.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers extensive security and integration with Azure, ideal for organizations focused on compliance and management. In comparison, VMware Tanzu Platform emphasizes Kubernetes management within VMware infrastructure, suitable for those needing more control over cloud-native and multi-cloud applications.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. VMware Tanzu Platform Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while VMware Tanzu Platform involves a more complex and potentially higher initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while VMware Tanzu Platform involves a more complex and potentially higher initial cost.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration
4.4 out of 5

Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration excels in phishing protection and integrates seamlessly with various cloud setups, making it ideal for collaboration-focused firms. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers robust integration with Microsoft services, appealing to those needing comprehensive threat protection across cloud environments.

Download Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration offers a transparent setup cost, ensuring clarity from the start, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud might present complexities in initial pricing, highlighting differences in cost structure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Email & Collaboration offers a transparent setup cost, ensuring clarity from the start, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud might present complexities in initial pricing, highlighting differences in cost structure between the two solutions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
VMware Aria Automation
4.0 out of 5
VMware Aria Automation excels in automation and integration with vCO, offering comprehensive server management and AD group integrations. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides robust security features, integrating with multi-cloud environments and offering flexible licensing for expansive security and compliance management.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. VMware Aria Automation Report
VMware Aria Automation offers a more affordable setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud presents a higher initial investment. The pricing variation highlights the distinct financial entry points and budget considerations for these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Aria Automation offers a more affordable setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud presents a higher initial investment. The pricing variation highlights the distinct financial entry points and budget considerations for these solutions.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Rapid7 InsightVM
4.0 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Rapid7 InsightVM
4.0 out of 5

Rapid7 InsightVM is a comprehensive vulnerability management platform that protects your systems from attackers and is easy to scale. The solution provides easy access to vulnerability management, application security, detection and response, external threat intelligence, orchestration and automation, and more. Rapid7 InsightVM is ideal for security, IT, and DevOps teams, helping them reduce risk by enabling them to detect and respond to attacks quickly.

The price of the solution is less than the competitors.
I do not have experience with the pricing of the solution.
View comparison
Pricing
The price of the solution is less than the competitors.
I do not have experience with the pricing of the solution.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Cyera
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Cyera
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in threat detection and Azure service integration. In comparison, Cyera emphasizes data discovery and governance, appealing to data-centric environments. Microsoft offers seamless deployment in its ecosystem, whereas Cyera focuses on rapid setup. Pricing favors Cyera for data governance.
Download Cyera vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a competitive setup cost, while Cyera features a more flexible pricing model. Key differences in their setup costs highlight distinct approaches to pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a competitive setup cost, while Cyera features a more flexible pricing model. Key differences in their setup costs highlight distinct approaches to pricing.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Amazon EKS
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Amazon EKS
4.2 out of 5
Amazon EKS provides a scalable, managed Kubernetes service focusing on simplicity and operational efficiency. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in security, offering robust management and monitoring, making it ideal for enterprises prioritizing security with integration capabilities.
Download Amazon EKS vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Amazon EKS has a transparent setup cost structure, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud presents a more flexible, potentially complex pricing model. This difference highlights Amazon EKS's straightforward approach compared to the customizable options offered by Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
View comparison
Pricing
Amazon EKS has a transparent setup cost structure, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud presents a more flexible, potentially complex pricing model. This difference highlights Amazon EKS's straightforward approach compared to the customizable options offered by Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Trivy
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Trivy
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers comprehensive security features for hybrid infrastructures. In comparison, Trivy is favored for its open-source flexibility and CI/CD integration, providing cost-effective vulnerability detection. Tech buyers may appreciate Defender's integration with Azure or Trivy's community-driven support and affordability.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Trivy Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a more complex setup with higher costs compared to Trivy, which offers a streamlined setup at minimal cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud has a more complex setup with higher costs compared to Trivy, which offers a streamlined setup at minimal cost.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP
4.3 out of 5
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP emphasizes IAM roles, compliance, and multi-cloud capabilities, ideal for comprehensive reporting. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in Azure integration and threat intelligence. Buyers choose CloudGuard for extensive visibility and Defender for seamless Azure synergy.
Download Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers scalable setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a more fixed pricing model, highlighting flexibility differences in initial investment strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point CloudGuard CNAPP offers scalable setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a more fixed pricing model, highlighting flexibility differences in initial investment strategies.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security
4.3 out of 5
Trend Vision One emphasizes real-time intrusion detection with straightforward management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender excels in integration within Microsoft's ecosystem. Trend Vision One seeks better automation, while Microsoft Defender addresses pricing complexity, benefiting tech buyers seeking tailored security solutions in specific environments.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Trend Vision One - Cloud Security Report
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security setup costs are transparent and potentially higher, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers more competitive pricing with lower initial setup fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One - Cloud Security setup costs are transparent and potentially higher, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers more competitive pricing with lower initial setup fees.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Aqua Cloud Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Aqua Cloud Security Platform offers competitive pricing and focuses on container security, appealing to cost-conscious, container-centric environments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels with Azure integration, providing enhanced threat protection and compliance, making it ideal for feature-focused tech buyers seeking extensive security solutions.
Download Aqua Cloud Security Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Aqua Cloud Security Platform has a moderate setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more cost-effective entry. The primary difference is in the initial expenditure, with Aqua requiring a higher investment compared to Defender's budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Aqua Cloud Security Platform has a moderate setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers a more cost-effective entry. The primary difference is in the initial expenditure, with Aqua requiring a higher investment compared to Defender's budget-friendly setup.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
FortiCNAPP
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
FortiCNAPP
4.2 out of 5
FortiCNAPP excels in machine learning anomaly detection and seamless data ingestion, fitting those prioritizing streamlined security management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers real-time monitoring and strong integration in Microsoft environments, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive multi-cloud support and robust compliance features.
Download FortiCNAPP vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
FortiCNAPP's initial setup cost is minimal, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a more substantial investment. FortiCNAPP offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the higher setup costs associated with Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiCNAPP's initial setup cost is minimal, whereas Microsoft Defender for Cloud requires a more substantial investment. FortiCNAPP offers a more budget-friendly option compared to the higher setup costs associated with Microsoft Defender for Cloud.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Cisco Secure Workload
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Secure Workload is favored for its competitive pricing and excellent support, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Cloud attracts with its feature-rich suite and seamless Azure integration, ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive capabilities despite higher costs.
Download Cisco Secure Workload vs. Microsoft Defender for Cloud Report
Cisco Secure Workload incurs higher setup costs than Microsoft Defender for Cloud, offering an expansive range of features in return. Conversely, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a more budget-friendly setup with essential security functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Secure Workload incurs higher setup costs than Microsoft Defender for Cloud, offering an expansive range of features in return. Conversely, Microsoft Defender for Cloud provides a more budget-friendly setup with essential security functionalities.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Microsoft Defender for Cloud Logo
Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM)
4.4 out of 5
Microsoft Defender for Cloud excels in security for Azure with AI-driven threat detection. In comparison, Nutanix Cloud Manager offers flexibility for managing hyper-converged infrastructure, benefitting those requiring seamless multi-cloud central management.
Download Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs. Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) Report
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers competitive setup costs compared to the more intricate pricing structure of Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), highlighting a straightforward initial investment for Defender users. Conversely, NCM's pricing can be more complex due to additional customizatio...
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers competitive setup costs compared to the more intricate pricing structure of Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM), highlighting a straightforward initial investment for Defender users. Conversely, NCM's pricing can be more complex due to additional customizatio...

Related categories

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP)
Vulnerability Management
Container Security