Appium Reviews

We use Appium to test our native applications for iOS and Android. The solution is deployed locally and integrated into our instance of GitHub Actions for CI/CD functionality, so it's a hybrid deployment. 

Using Appium with React Native allows us to reuse our tests for both Android and iOS. If we had to use one tool for Android and another for iOS, we would need two repositories, two tests, and a lot more coding for us to do. I think React Native is the only real solution available nowadays for black box testing the way we prefer to do it.

We develop apps using the React Native framework, and Appium integrates well for testing those apps. The Appium automation framework also has good integration with GitHub Actions and plenty of other tools and frameworks, including BrowserStack. 

Appium also offers plenty of testing interactions, including swipes and other actions. It provides more interactions compared to other solutions like Selenium HQ, which is another tool we work with.

Appium Inspector is another excellent feature that provides us with a lot of information when dealing with app elements. One of our uses for this is determining which selectors are faster, as we want our apps to be as fast as possible. 

We previously worked with native applications, and there weren't any good mobile app testing tools. We started working with React Native, which works well with Appium, but it would be good to see better integration; the way elements are displayed can be messy. React Native is very popular nowadays, so it's essential to have that compatibility.

Appium doesn't recognize IDs placed by our developers on nested elements when we use React Native for iOS; it just sees the whole page and one element. We use coordinates to get around this, but it isn't the best system, and nobody in the community has been able to help us.

iOS is also strict in general when it comes to signatures and developer accounts, which creates additional headaches for iOS testing compared to Android. It would be great to see a more streamlined setup for iOS, but that might be more of an Apple issue than an Appium one. 

We have been using the solution for about four years. 

The solution is relatively stable, but sometimes tests can become flaky. This could be because of Appium, or due to a cloud-related issue, it isn't exactly clear. It's more stable than it was four years ago, so the product has improved, but there is still room for better stability. 

The solution is scalable. Once it's installed on the machines or in the cloud, everyone can run it and I don't think it matters how many staff members use it. We have nine end users in our organization. 

Appium is an open-source solution so there isn't a number to call for technical support. However, there is a large user community, so it's easy to find help for issues. 

The initial setup is very straightforward; it's just a download with a desktop installation. Setup time depends on your internet, but I would say it takes minutes.

Appium is open source; we can use it for free.

We looked at Espresso and XCUITest, which are native testing apps for Android and iOS, respectively, but we can't use those for both in React Native. We carried out a POC for Appium, and there were no viable alternatives. It allows us to use one tool and one repository for both mobile operating systems.

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. 

Appium is a great tool, and I recommend it. Working with iOS requires patience, and setup can be somewhat demanding, but there are no such problems with Android. Overall, the solution does what we need it to do.

Our use case for Appium is writing end-to-end tests for mobile applications. We also use it for some data extraction for an end-to-end user desk.

For the particular use case we used Appium for, we felt that it served our purpose completely, and we haven't had any issues with the Python Client for Appium. Appium has been a good solution for us.

I haven't explored other solutions in this particular area, but what I like best about Appium is the fact that it shares functions with Selenium. The extension of Selenium functions allows me to use all of the methods that exist in that domain, and it just makes it simpler for me. I've been using Selenium for some time as well, so using Appium just seems like a natural fit for me.

What needs improvement in Appium is its documentation. It needs to give more context on the libraries that Appium is using under the hood. For example, my team is using Appium for Android automation, and a lot of times, I feel that there's functionality that's available through the Appium interface, that exists within the UIAutomator, but there aren't a lot of useful or helpful resources on the internet to find that information, so it would be good to have some linkage with the underlying platform itself.

Another room for improvement in Appium is that it's buggy sometimes. For example, at times, there's a bug in the inspector application that doesn't allow me to save my desired capability set, so it would be nice to get that bug fixed, but overall, Appium is a good tool.

The Touch Actions functionality in Appium also needs improvement. For example, if I want to initiate a scroll on the device that I'm running Appium on, sometimes Swipe works, but in other situations, I have to explicitly use action chains, so I'm not too sure what's the better approach.

What I'd like to see in the next version of Appium is a more intelligent and more intuitive AppiumLibrary, in terms of identifying menus and scroll bars, etc., because right now, I'm unsure if I have to do a lot of export reversals to get to the elements I'm looking for. It would be nice to have some functionality built in, which would allow me to easily get those exports.

I've been using Appium for almost two and a half years now.

Appium is stable so far, performance-wise. I never had any performance issues with Appium scripts, and I could potentially do as many Appium programs as I want, and I'd only be limited by the compute capacity of the particular machine that I'm running it on, so no issues there.

Appium has decent scalability, and I've primarily used the Appium-Python-Client. What the Appium team could look into would be the possibility of running Appium in a cluster because currently, there's not a lot of in-depth documentation on how to do it.

For example, the way Selenium Hub works with Kubernetes, if Appium can have that functionality of working with Kubernetes, then that would ensure the greatest scalability for Appium.

I've never had to reach out to the Appium technical support team. I'm not even aware of the support channels for Appium, but I haven't had to reach out ever.

I wasn't sure of what other solutions existed out there. I just came across Appium, and I thought that Appium suits my use case, and it's open source, so that helps.

The initial setup for Appium wasn't as straightforward. I was an individual contributor that pitched this idea to my organization about using Appium, and I was solely responsible for researching it, writing code, then deploying it. It wasn't too straightforward, but in the end, I was able to get it done.

I did the deployment of Appium all by myself.

There were implicit monetary benefits that have come from our use of Appium, so ROI wasn't explicit. We got cost savings, reductions in downtime, stability, etc., from using Appium, which translates to ROI.

I'm unsure if there's any cost associated with Appium. I got the free package which includes the server GUI application and the inspector application, and it was free to download, and that's all I need to get my work done.

I'm not aware of any additional costs associated with the tool. Essentially, if you want to run Appium in a production environment, you'll need to hook it up with an emulation service, and though that's outside the scope, that has to tie and deliver the entire solution.

I'm using the Appium-Python-Client version 2.1.2.

In my company, between four to five people use Appium.

The number of people required to maintain Appium depends on the number of tests you've written. In my company, a single person can maintain it.

Right now, Appium is being used pretty extensively within the company. My team runs and tests four to five different applications, and that list will be extended, so usage of Appium will go up in the future. It's not going to go down.

The advice I would give to anyone on Appium for the first time is to look into the underlying automation, for example, the UIAutomator for testing. I would urge you to also look into the different functionalities offered by the base automation and essentially use those features provided by the base automation within that context because that's going to give you the biggest branch of data.

My rating for Appium is seven out of ten, based on the work I'm doing on it.

My company is a customer of Appium.

I'm using Appium for the automation of applications on Android and iOS.

Appium has improved my company because it makes it easier to connect devices to automation scripts because the library is easy to use. You can also detect mobile elements faster in both Android and iOS.

The best feature of Appium is that it allows you to inspect the element. With the Appium Inspector, you don't have to install another application to do the inspection. I also like that Appium has Android device connectivity. Currently, most people use Appium as automation software, and I haven't found any other tool that's more powerful than Appium.

I rarely use Appium nowadays because I'm now at the managerial level, but the last time I used it, whenever I selected and clicked on an element, Appium was very slow. I tried to debug it, but I still couldn't find the problem, so this is an area for improvement in the solution.

Another area for improvement lies with the connector and server. For example, the effort to get into the local machine sometimes causes the emulator to become slow, which then leads to failure in testing, and this is the usual issue I've encountered from Appium.

An additional feature I'd like added to Appium in its next release is being able to do automation in iOS without using XPath and the name of the element. In Xcode, you can use previous UI tests for detecting elements, but in Appium, you have to use Xpath and the element name instead of being able to directly put the X-UiPath, which is what you can do in Xcode. In iOS as well, sometimes the element doesn't have a name or a path. Sometimes, there's also no element.

I've been using Appium for more than four years.

Appium is a solution that's quite stable.

Appium is a scalable solution. A lot of devices are connected to Appium, and the solution runs every day for integration testing, with new test cases added daily. Appium keeps growing, and it's scalable.

A separate team works with the Appium technical support team whenever there's an issue, so I have no experience contacting support.

I've only used Appium, and I haven't found a solution that's as good as Appium.

Setting up Appium is quite easy because a lot of documentation can be found on the internet. From setup to deployment, it only takes less than one hour if there's no problem, but usually, the problem is on the environment side, not in Appium itself. Sometimes the emulator doesn't connect to Appium, and sometimes there's a broken dependency, for example, Node.js isn't supported, or a certain percentage of Node.js must be used.

As far as I know, Appium is a free solution. It's not for commercial use.

I'm using the latest version of Appium.

My current company has a lot of programmers, so I don't have the exact figure on how many people use Appium, but in my previous company, two people deployed the solution on the cloud server.

The only time maintenance is required in Appium is when there's a new update, and my team would first ask about how stable the new version is, then that's the time the team upgrades the version of Appium.

In the AP department, seventy to eighty people use the solution. The users only create the automation path and then test it on the local machines with Appium, then deploy it on the cloud server. The AP users aren't in charge of maintaining Appium.

I'd recommend the solution to other users. Most of the companies here in Indonesia use Appium, and on a scale of one to ten, my rating for Appium is nine out of ten.

My company is a customer of Appium.

It's open-source. 

There is quite a lot of support available and it has some features that are quite mature. Overall, it's a good tool for committing mobile applications. It's become kind of a norm across the industry, especially in the open-source world as it is kind of based on Selenium.

It's a straightforward setup.

The solution is stable.

It has great documentation and excellent community support. 

It is a scalable product.

If we want smart reporting, intelligent dashboards, and all those things, we can link it. It's very flexible as an open-source tool.

There are Android and IOS, two key platforms. There are some other dependencies that typically are taken care of by some of the commercial tools like Xperitus. These kinds of tools take care of these other aspects. 

One thing which can be really helpful is that there is some kind of a recorder made available rather than scripting everything. There needs to be some kind of recorder or some kind of platform which is made available. That would add immense value. It's already very popular, however, that will help a lot to experience the overall automation development.

I've been using the solution for the last five years. In my previous organization, I used it extensively.

The solution is very stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. Appium bills are relatively stable as compared to many of the tools out there. They have good documentation and they have good support and their community support is very good. If you run into issues, there are a lot of ways to deal with the problem. 

It is scalable, however, that will require some proper coding in the background to set up certain servers. We have actually run multiple testing parallel. Many of these supports are not available out of the box. They are something that we need to script and build, however, there are many libraries available on the list. For somebody who is starting from scratch, it would be fairly easy.

While, in my past organization, we had 50 to 60 people on the solution, in my current company, there are a bit fewer at about 30. 

Community support is always available to help. It's very useful. There's also a lot of documentation available to help troubleshoot. 

The initial setup is very straightforward. It's not overly complex or difficult. 

There is some maintenance required, however, it depends on the application changes that are being made. 

It has good documentation and an SDT or developer would be able to do it. There is no need for outside consultants or integrators. 

The solution is open-source and free to use. 

We're just end-users. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. Typically, we go with the latest update.

We deploy both on the cloud and on-premises. We use it for some of our cloud-based solutions, however, it's primarily on-premise where we integrate various devices and we do the end-to-end testing.

It's good to start with a very stable framework, so that will enhance the reusability that will reduce the maintenance down the line or other that will reduce the ease of maintenance down the line.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. With it being open-source, and de to the lack of the cost, it's a critical factor for many of our customers and that's the bread and butter for service provider automation. We have some skilled resources we can take care of it. 

We use Appium mainly for mobile test automation, while Selenium doesn't support mobile testing. In my personal use of the tool, I primarily convert manual test cases into automated test cases. We also link our test cases between Selenium and Appium with cases from Jira

The solution helps with test automation. We focus mostly on Java.   

One area where I think Appium could improve is in addressing security concerns for our data. Currently, we're unable to use cloud solutions like CloudForm due to security restrictions on our servers. We also face challenges in updating packages for the same reason. It would be beneficial if the solution could provide better support for auto-reporting and easier connections to mobile device farms.

I have been working with the product for six months. 

I rate the product's stability as six out of ten. 

I rate the solution's scalability a four out of ten. 

The solution's deployment is not simple.  

The solution is open-source. 

I rate Appium a seven out of ten. 

Appium helps me to do as much as much as I want to. 

The tool needs to add a dependency manager. 

I have been using the product for three to four years. 

I rate the tool's stability an eight out of ten. 

I rate Appium's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has five users. 

Appium's deployment is straightforward. 

I rate Appium an eight out of ten. 

We are using Appium for testing.

The most valuable feature of Appium is it supports iOS and AOS and is open-source.

Appium could improve by enabling record and run techniques similar to what they have in other licensing tools, such as Micro Focus. We have to all write the code, and then we can proceed.

I have been using Appium for approximately four years.

Appium is stable.

The scalability of Appium is good. It support supports different operating systems, such as iOS and AOS.

We have 10 to 12 people using this solution.

All the test engineers are using it.

The solution is open-source, there is not any direct support. You can browse the internet for support information.

I have not used another solution previously.

The initial setup of Appium is straightforward.

I rate the setup of Appium a five out of five.

There is no license for this solution because it is open-source.

There are not a lot of tools for mobile testing. Appium is one of the only open-source mobile testing solutions.

My advice to others is they should use the solution if they have experiences in any technical language, such as Java and C#.

I rate Appium a nine out of ten.

The primary use case of the solution was to automate a mobile Android app that was related to IP configuration cameras to design their system and to run those cameras using the app.

I found the Appium Inspector to be the most valuable feature because it helps to write the scripts down.

The solution can be improved by granting more flexibility around integration with app activity ID, which is sometimes not easily available for automation engineers to configure.

There is room for improvement with the scalability of the Appium server interaction.

I would like a feature to allow for iOS automation without having to use Apple Xcode.

I have used the solution on multiple occasions throughout the years. The last time I used the solution was around nine months ago.

The latest versions of the solution are stable.

The solution is scalable. 

The initial setup is straightforward if you have previous experience with the solution, but it can be complicated for a novice user.

The solution is open source.

I give the solution eight out of ten.

There are a lot of helpful documents available online if you require support with the solution.

When it comes to mobile automation, I recommend this solution because of its performance, and scalability over the competition.