GitLab, GitHub, and Microsoft Azure DevOps are leaders in the DevOps tools category. Microsoft Azure DevOps seems to possess an upper hand due to its seamless integration with Azure Cloud services and strong project management features.
Features: GitLab offers advanced repository management, efficient CI/CD pipeline management, and robust code review tools. GitHub provides a stable and intuitive CI/CD implementation with seamless branching and merging capabilities. Azure DevOps stands out with its integration with Azure Cloud services, comprehensive project management via Azure Boards, and effective test management through Azure Test Plans.
Room for Improvement: GitLab needs better AWS integration, simpler third-party tool connectivity including Jira, and clearer pricing for premium features. Azure DevOps could improve integration with non-Microsoft tools, enhance its dashboards, and streamline user-access flexibility for large deployments.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab offers straightforward setup with various cloud deployment options but relies on community forums for support. Azure DevOps provides a more structured support mechanism with diverse deployment options, though response times and resources for mixed infrastructure could be better.
Pricing and ROI: GitLab's free version is appreciated, but paid tiers, particularly the Ultimate, are costly. However, ROI is reported as good due to automation and productivity gains. Azure DevOps is known for competitive pricing, especially with Microsoft enterprise agreements, and provides flexible license scaling. Its ROI is evident in reduced deployment times and strong ecosystem synergy.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
The solution is stable, and we did not encounter any stability issues.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
The UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Enhanced system guidance highlighting best practices would be beneficial, especially if experienced personnel are not available for support.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
I find it to be expensive.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
We are utilizing the pipelines extensively and gaining significant benefits from GitLab.
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions.
Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:
Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:
Reviews from Real Users
Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.
PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.”
Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”
We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
