AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab comparison

Read 80 GitLab reviews

7,354 Views
5,978 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

GitLab and AWS CodePipeline are both popular tools in the DevOps realm. GitLab seems to have the upper hand for smaller teams due to its comprehensive features and cost-effectiveness, while AWS CodePipeline is preferred by larger enterprises for its integration with AWS services and infrastructure capabilities.

Features: GitLab offers built-in version control, issue tracking, and CI/CD capabilities on a unified platform. AWS CodePipeline provides seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem, reliable performance, and scalability. GitLab's open-source nature and customization options are beneficial, whereas AWS CodePipeline supports automated deployment workflows and native AWS integrations.

Room for Improvement: GitLab users highlight the need for enhanced support for large-scale operations, better resource management, and optimization for handling complex projects. AWS CodePipeline users look for improvements in UI responsiveness, more customization options for non-AWS environments, and a more intuitive user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab is known for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer support, making it accessible for varied user skill levels. AWS CodePipeline provides extensive documentation and training but may require more AWS-specific knowledge for optimal setup. GitLab's support earns praise for its responsiveness, while AWS CodePipeline benefits from scaling efficiencies and comprehensive AWS documentation.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab offers attractive pricing for startups and mid-sized companies, highlighting strong ROI through its integrated feature set. AWS CodePipeline is potentially costlier, delivering ROI through unmatched scalability and integration within the AWS suite, appealing to larger enterprises seeking extensive deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. GitLab Report (Updated: December 2024).

AWS CodePipeline vs. GitLab

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitLab

Ranking in Build Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (11th), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (10th), Rapid Application Development Software (13th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 6.8%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 17.5%, down from 19.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

Corné den Hollander

Product Owner at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage

It's more related to the supporting layer of features, such as issue management and issue tracking. We tend to always use, for example, Jira next to it. That doesn't mean that GitLab should build something similar to Jira because that will always have its place, but they could grow a bit in those kinds of supporting features. I see some, for example, covering ITSM on a DevOps team level, and that's one of the things that I and my current client would find really helpful. It's understandably not going to be their main focus and their core, and whenever you are with a company that needs a bit more advanced features on that specific topic, you're probably still going to integrate with another tool like Jira Service Management, for example. However, some basic features on things like that could be really helpful. In terms of additional features, nothing comes to mind. One of the potential pitfalls is to keep adding new features and functionalities. They can just improve some of the existing features to make it high-end, top-quality. I don't have any substantial experience with agile planning. I don't know the industries GitLab is in, and I don't know why they make decisions like this, but as a customer, I would rather see them invest in improving the basic agile planning functionalities rather than adding, for example, portfolio planning features. That's because if I'm going to do portfolio planning, I probably will also need a lot of business users. I'm not sure if I want them in GitLab, I'd rather have them in Jira collaborating with me on portfolio planning. That's way better fitted for that type of work.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."

"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."

"Another big advantage is observability."

"The management of CodeBuild and CodeDeploy on a three-point trigger basis is an important feature."

"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."

"AWS CodePipeline's most valuable feature is its seamless integration with other AWS services, making it easier to orchestrate deployment processes."

"Code deployment is the best feature."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"The user interface is really good so that helps with huge teams who need to collaborate."

"GitLab has better support, and its features are superior compared to Jenkins."

"It speeds up our development, it's faster, safer, and more convenient."

"I have had no problem with the stability of the solution."

"GitLab is a solution for source code management, container registry, pipelines, testing, and deployment."

"It streamlines our DevOps processes with automated CI/CD pipelines."

"It is a speedy platform compared to the others I have used. I have also enjoyed using the platform as this solution offers a good user experience."

"I like GitLab's security and SAS tools."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"In AWS CodePipeline, we can only use certain tools for which AWS provisions plugins."

"The setup time is a bit long."

"If you're talking about multi-cloud, you can't use it."

"AWS CodePipeline works effectively, and I haven't identified any specific areas needing improvement as it has been quite satisfying in terms of deployment needs."

"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."

"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."

"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."

"One downside in AWS is that when you attempt to push a change in, it misses that part, or it could be because some variables are not set correctly."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"We would like to generate document pages from the sources."

"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."

"I would like to see AI support in GitLab."

"I would like to have some features to support peer review."

"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."

"As GitLab is not perfect, what needs improvement in the solution is the Wiki feature of the groups or the repertories because currently, it's not searchable by default. You'll need an indexing service such as Elasticsearch to make it searchable, and that requires too much work, so for me, it's the main feature that should be improved in GitLab. In the next version of the solution, from the top of my head, the documentation could be improved. Besides the Wiki, it would be good if there's documentation that would be automatically generated based on the code repository. In other words, there should be some tutorials from GitLab for developers in the next release."

"For as long as I have used GitLab, I haven't encountered any major limitations. However, I think that perhaps the search functionality could be better."

"Perhaps the integration could be better."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the product depends on how many times you run it. The tool offers a pay-as-you-go model."

"Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"AWS charges you based on the number of pipelines you have and how active they are, and I also think that the root account user knows about all the price-related metrics."

"It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model."

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

"The pricing is manageable."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

"My company uses the free version of GitLab, which is GitLab Community Edition. There is a licensed version also available for GitLab."

"We are currently using the open-source version."

"The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."

"As I work in a vast enterprise, I'm unsure about the licensing cost for GitLab. It's the management team that takes care of that."

"Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."

"GitLab is highly priced for smaller teams, but it's okay if considering a user base of thousands."

"In terms of the pricing for GitLab, on a scale of one to five, with one being expensive and five being cheap, I'm rating pricing for the solution a four. It could still be cheaper because right now, my company has a small team, and sometimes it's difficult to use a paid product for a small team. You'd hope the team will grow and scale, but currently, you're paying a high license fee for a small team. I'm referring to the GitLab license that has premium features and will give you all features. This can be a problem for management to approve the high price of the license for a team this small."

"This product is not very expensive but the price can be better."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

GitLab is mostly free, with potential costs arising from upgrade versions. There is a trial period of about six months during which it is free. Afterward, fees apply.

What needs improvement with GitLab?

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has...

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 12% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 6% of the time

Tekton vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 5% of the time

Bamboo vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 2% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 39% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

Bamboo vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodePipeline

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

Fuzzit

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

AWS CodePipeline vs. GitLab