AWS CodePipeline vs GitLab comparison

Read 81 GitLab reviews

7,165 Views
5,755 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

GitLab and AWS CodePipeline compete in the DevOps and CI/CD category. GitLab has an edge with broader functionality in code management and integration flexibility, whereas AWS CodePipeline is preferred for its efficient deployment within the AWS ecosystem.

Features: GitLab is known for comprehensive CI/CD management, code review capabilities, and robust features like branch management and code merging. It offers integration with CIE and flexibility in development environments. AWS CodePipeline shines with smooth integration with AWS services, providing strong automation capabilities and efficient CI/CD implementations. It acts as a one-stop solution for integrating, deploying, and hosting applications within AWS.

Room for Improvement: GitLab could enhance integration with non-Kubernetes environments, expand metrics reporting for leadership, and refine third-party integrations such as with project management tools. AWS CodePipeline faces challenges in customization and lacks multi-cloud capabilities. Improving integration with non-AWS services and simplifying setup processes would enhance its usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab offers flexible deployment options across multiple cloud environments and on-premises with community support as its backbone. AWS CodePipeline operates within the AWS ecosystem, benefiting from AWS’s comprehensive support structure. Users of GitLab highlight the need for improved direct support, whereas AWS’s seamless integration aids smoother technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab has diverse pricing, offering free and paid tiers. The Premium version is considered cost-effective, though Ultimate features are noted to be pricey. Its ROI is marked by reduced deployment times and enhanced DevOps productivity. AWS CodePipeline offers a pay-as-you-go model deemed affordable, with costs correlated to usage and associated AWS services. It is considered potentially pricier compared to alternatives but offers cost-effectiveness for frequent deployments. Both GitLab and AWS CodePipeline provide notable ROI, yet GitLab may be more appealing to smaller teams or organizations seeking a wide range of functionalities at different price points.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. GitLab Report (Updated: January 2025).

AWS CodePipeline vs. GitLab

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitLab

Ranking in Build Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (10th), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (9th), Rapid Application Development Software (12th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 6.7%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 17.4%, down from 19.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

Boosted productivity with automated pipelines and seamless collaboration

There are some challenges with repository file management as GitLab may struggle to manage larger files. Improvements could be made regarding size management and file partitioning. Also, the UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."

"The tool's recent version helps us to run pipelines in parallel. The integration with other AWS services has greatly impacted our use of AWS CodePipeline. It made tasks such as integrating with Jira and provisioning instances much easier."

"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."

"It helps develop CI/CD implementations with centralized management of code building, deployment, and version control."

"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."

"CodePipeline allows integration with any source code and facilitates deployment to EC2 or ECS, which is highly valuable."

"The integrations are good."

"Another big advantage is observability."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"Continuous integration with deployment is very powerful, which is a significant reason for migrating from TFS to GitLab."

"GitLab is a solution for source code management, container registry, pipelines, testing, and deployment."

"The most valuable feature of GitLab is its convenience. I am able to trace back most of my changes up to a far distance in time and it helps me to analyze and see the older version of the code."

"CI/CD is very good. The version control system is also good. These are the two features that we use."

"GitLab is very well-organized and easy to use. Also, it offers most features that customers need."

"The solution has an established roadmap that lays out its plans for upgrades over the next two to three years."

"GitLab integrates well with other platforms."

"The important feature is the entire process of versioning source code maintenance and easy deployment. It is a necessity for the CI/CD pipeline."

More GitLab pros

Cons

"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."

"While CodePipeline's UI has improved, further enhancements in user experience are necessary to make it more intuitive."

"AWS CodePipeline works effectively, and I haven't identified any specific areas needing improvement as it has been quite satisfying in terms of deployment needs."

"Improved enhancements and features could make it more intuitive."

"The setup time is a bit long."

"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."

"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"The solution should again offer an on-premises deployment option."

"It would be really good if they integrated more features in application security."

"The licensing model could be improved to be more accommodating in terms of user numbers and costs."

"GitLab could improve the patch repository. It does not have support for Conan patch version regions. Additionally, better support for Kubernetes deployment is needed as part of the package."

"The price of GitLab could improve, it is high."

"It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain."

"I've noticed an area for improvement in GitLab, particularly needing to go through many steps to push the code to the repository. Resolving that issue would make the product better. My team quickly fixed it by writing a small script, then double-clicking or enabling the script to take care of the issue. However, that quick fix was from my team and not the GitLab team, so in the next release, if an automatic deployment feature would be available in GitLab, then that would be good because, in Visual Studio, you can do that with just one click of a button."

"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."

More GitLab cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS charges you based on the number of pipelines you have and how active they are, and I also think that the root account user knows about all the price-related metrics."

"The price of the product depends on how many times you run it. The tool offers a pay-as-you-go model."

"The pricing is manageable."

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."

"Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

"AWS offers free business or enterprise support services."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

"I don't mind the price because I use the free version."

"It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."

"GitLab is a free solution to use."

"The solution is free."

"GitLab's pricing is good compared to others on the market."

"GitLab is comparatively expensive, but it provides value because it's feature-rich."

"I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."

"My company uses the free version of GitLab, which is GitLab Community Edition. There is a licensed version also available for GitLab."

More GitLab pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

29%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

What needs improvement with GitLab?

There are missing search features, particularly when searching repositories or applying filters. Additionally, I have encountered issues with the deployment of CI/CD pipelines, especially dealing w...

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 12% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 6% of the time

Tekton vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 4% of the time

Bamboo vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 2% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 37% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab

Compared 8% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 5% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodePipeline

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

Fuzzit

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.

It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.

With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

AWS CodePipeline vs. GitLab