GitHub CoPilot vs GitLab comparison

Read 88 GitLab reviews

17,371 Views
1,563 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

GitHub CoPilot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

GitLab and GitHub CoPilot compete in the software development and version control arena. GitLab seems to have an upper hand with its comprehensive feature set that supports a wide range of DevOps activities, while GitHub CoPilot is notable for its advanced AI-driven code suggestion features, aimed at enhancing developer productivity.

Features: GitLab is recognized for its CI/CD pipeline management, repository control, and seamless integration capabilities. GitHub CoPilot, however, focuses on code suggestion, multi-language support, and test case creation, improving coding efficiency by reducing manual coding time.

Room for Improvement: GitLab could benefit from better integration with AWS, enhanced project management compatibility, and improved documentation. GitHub CoPilot needs more accurate code suggestions, support for more languages, and improved integration with various development environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitLab offers flexible deployment options including public, private, and hybrid clouds, supported by community-driven assistance with limited response for free users. GitHub CoPilot provides on-premises deployment, relying on community and licensing-based support, but lacks GitLab's cloud flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: GitLab is available as open-source and paid versions, suitable for small teams to enterprises, though the Ultimate edition might require business justification. GitHub CoPilot has a tiered pricing model, including a free version, with additional costs for enterprise use which can be substantial for larger teams.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab Report (Updated: December 2025).

GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

7.3

GitHub CoPilot boosts productivity and reduces costs with up to 500% return, improving customer experience and documentation efficiency.

Sentiment score

5.9

GitLab boosts ROI by enhancing DevOps efficiency, time-saving automation, software security, and user satisfaction through broad project adoption.

Efficiencies with GitHub CoPilot have improved by 30%, which means a quicker go-to market and a simplified way of documenting technical designs.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Vice President of Products at C5i

Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

Customer Service

Sentiment score

4.6

Users have mixed experiences with GitHub CoPilot support, praising community help but noting occasional response delays and onboarding improvements.

Sentiment score

6.5

GitLab support varies by subscription, with paid users satisfied, while free users often use forums or internal resources.

With a large user base, it covers a wide range of questions, from simple to complex, ensuring that answers are available.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

GitHub technical support is excellent.

Majd Alasfar

AppSec engineer at EastNets Holding Ltd.

We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.9

GitHub CoPilot scales effectively, providing easy cloud-based scalability and flexibility, despite occasional traffic issues and automation challenges.

Sentiment score

7.3

GitLab is praised for adaptability, handling diverse workloads and large architectures smoothly, though some on-premises scalability issues remain.

It cannot be fully depended on to build every component and run a large enterprise application without significant human intervention.

Vice President of Products at C5i

With an enterprise plan, there are no limitations, so scalability is not an issue.

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

It is quite easy to scale.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

QA Manager at Synechron

It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

For scaling, other deployment options from GitLab's side need to be adopted.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.3

GitHub CoPilot is generally stable, rated highly by users, with minor connectivity issues noted primarily in large enterprises.

Sentiment score

8.1

Users praise GitLab for stability and reliability with minimal downtime, highlighting its strong performance and high stability ratings.

In most cases, it does not generate irrelevant code.

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

At certain times, you may not get the required response and realize it's either down or not responding for other reasons.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Vice President of Products at C5i

I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.

Gaurav Chandel

AWS DevOps/ Site Reliability Engineer at Tata Consultancy

The updates are frequent and demanding, happening at least once a week due to security reasons.

Andrew Schetinin

Chief Technology Officer at Acclym

We raised a request with GitLab support, but they were unable to help because they could not find the root cause of what went wrong.

AvdheshSharma

Assistant Manager at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

Room For Improvement

GitHub CoPilot needs better language support, IDE integration, user control, contextual accuracy, debugging, and technology support with cost concerns.

GitLab users want better integrations, documentation, project management, intuitive pipelines, enhanced security, user-friendly interface, and simplified pricing.

Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

QA Manager at Synechron

There is excellent support across various code editors like JetBrains, VS Code, and NeoGen.

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

To understand our application better and learn from it would likely require access to the entire codebase, which a lot of companies may not allow.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Vice President of Products at C5i

It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

It is essential to conduct proper testing, such as unit tests and code coverage, within the SDLC pipelines.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

Setup Cost

GitHub CoPilot offers a free version, personal and enterprise pricing, with varied perceptions on its value and affordability.

GitLab offers a free tier, with Premium at $19 and Ultimate at $99 per user monthly, plus optional CI/CD costs.

They recently made Copilot free to use up to a certain limit, which is a positive change.

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

The kind of use that I am having with a $20-30 license, I think it is really of really good help.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

QA Manager at Synechron

Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.

Sarfaraz Khan

Senior Application Developer at IBM

The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

IT Manager at a tech company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

Valuable Features

GitHub CoPilot boosts coding productivity with AI-driven suggestions, multi-language support, and IDE integration for efficient development.

GitLab excels in CI/CD pipelines, usability, integration, and automation, enhancing collaboration, productivity, and efficient DevOps workflows.

It is certainly time-saving; we have seen upwards of around 30% plus of time savings using GitHub CoPilot.

Vice President of Products at C5i

Things which were taking like two days are now finished within half an hour.

QA Manager at Synechron

Copilot is integrated into my environment, providing the context and the bigger picture of how the code is used throughout the project.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitHub CoPilot report

Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.

Mikhael Ibrahim

Platform Engineer & Manager at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.

Andrea PICCININI

IT Software Architect at ANAC - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

For more quotes and insights, download the GitLab report

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Categories and Ranking

GitHub CoPilot

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Code Assistants (2nd)

GitLab

Ranking in Rapid Application Development Software

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (12th), Build Automation (1st), Release Automation (2nd), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (8th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (2nd), Fuzz Testing Tools (2nd), DevSecOps (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Rapid Application Development Software category, the mindshare of GitHub CoPilot is 4.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitLab is 2.7%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Rapid Application Development Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub CoPilot	4.7%
GitLab	2.7%
Other	92.6%

Rapid Application Development Software

Featured Reviews

AI coding assistant has transformed development speed and supports learning new languages

QA Manager at Synechron

Any technology comes with two things, or rather anything in this world has both sides, good and bad. LLMs also have the same thing. The bad part is for a person who is 100% dependent on AI because they won't be able to learn more if they are 100% dependent on that. The main thing is that there has to be restraint from our side. I won't say it is from the tool side, but from our side, we need to learn and we need to work on it. We need to review the code. That is one thing that we need to do from our end. From a technology perspective, it is designed to help us out, and it is totally on our side of thinking about how exactly we are going to use that. There is not any area for improvement from the tool side, but it is from the users altogether. Users should not be 100% reliant on AI or any LLMs. They need to work on it and they need to review the code.

Read full review

Improved agility and time to market with CI/CD enhancements

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

The CI/CD pipelines in GitLab are highly valuable. Another important feature is the single source of repository, allowing efficient repository management and source code management. GitLab provides manageability by allowing us to manage source code effectively through separate repositories. Additionally, GitLab enables the creation of individual CI/CD pipelines for each repository, making software more agile. By integrating GitLab as a DevOps platform, we have enhanced agility, improved our time to market, and different teams can work collaboratively on various projects.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	43

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub CoPilot?

The product is easy to integrate.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub CoPilot?

I am not fully aware of the pricing details as my company manages it, but I recall it was not inexpensive.

What needs improvement with GitHub CoPilot?

GitHub CoPilot should be integrated with different IDEs beyond VS Code, as it is currently only supported by VS Code.

What do you like most about GitLab?

I find the features and version control history to be most valuable for our development workflow. These aspects provide us with a clear view of changes and help us manage requests efficiently.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitLab?

We are currently using general GitLab, not GitLab Premium.

What needs improvement with GitLab?

GitLab can be improved by being more responsive in the UI and offering better pricing for premium features, which would be useful for small startups. While GitLab's CI/CD is powerful, it is somewha...

Blackbox.ai vs GitHub CoPilot

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon Q vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

Claude for Enterprise vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

Qodo Gen vs GitHub CoPilot

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub CoPilot Competitors

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GitLab

Compared 48% of the time

SonarQube vs GitLab

Compared 4% of the time

Tekton vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

TeamCity vs GitLab

Compared 3% of the time

Jenkins vs GitLab

Compared 2% of the time

More GitLab Competitors

Product Reports

GitHub CoPilot

Download GitHub CoPilot product report

Download GitLab product report

Also Known As

No data available

Fuzzit

Overview

GitHub CoPilot accelerates developer productivity with code generation, test case creation, and code explanation. It provides context-aware suggestions, integrates with popular IDEs, and supports multiple languages.

GitHub CoPilot significantly boosts development efficiency by reducing coding and debugging time. Its user-friendly auto-complete and variable detection features streamline complex tasks, serving as a learning tool for developers. Areas needing improvement include its accuracy, stability, and broader integration with IDEs and languages. Users find the pricing strategy expensive and wish for enhanced contextual understanding, diverse result formats, and image support. Expanded functionality and better integration in highly regulated environments are important for future growth.

What are the most valued features of GitHub CoPilot?

Code Generation: Accelerates coding with smart suggestions.
Test Case Creation: Streamlines automated testing.
Code Explanation: Offers detailed insights into code segments.
Context-Aware Suggestions: Provides personalized assistance.
Multi-Language Support: Enhances versatility across programming languages.

Which benefits should users look for in reviews?

Increased Efficiency: Reduces time spent on coding tasks.
Enhanced Productivity: Speeds up the development process.
Learning Aid: Aids developers in understanding and creating complex code.
Task Automation: Facilitates automating repetitive coding tasks.

Utilized across industries to enhance application development and productivity, GitHub CoPilot assists in generating code snippets, writing code skeletons, analyzing documents, and automating workflows. It supports coding best practices, prompt engineering, and natural language processing. Developers leverage its capabilities for creating meeting summaries, report recommendations, and content ideas, thereby optimizing workflow efficiency.

GitHub

GitLab offers a secure and user-friendly platform for CI/CD pipeline management, code repository control, and collaboration, enhancing development speed and efficiency. It facilitates automation with extensive customization and tool integration, ideal for DevOps processes.

GitLab supports source code management, version control, and collaborative development. It's frequently used in CI/CD processes to automate builds and deployments while integrating DevOps practices. GitLab allows companies to manage repositories, automate pipelines, conduct code reviews, and maintain development lifecycles. The platform supports infrastructure and configuration management, enabling efficient code collaboration, deployment automation, and comprehensive repository handling. Many organizations commit and deploy developed code using GitLab's capabilities.

What are GitLab's most valuable features?

CI/CD Pipeline Management: Streamlines development through automated testing and deployment.
User-Friendly Interface: Ensures ease of collaboration and task automation.
Code Merging and Branching: Facilitates smooth code integration and version control.
Security Platform: Provides strong security features for safe development.
Tool Integration: Enhances functionality with diverse tool integration.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Development Speed: Accelerates processes through automation.
Collaboration Ease: Simplifies team interactions and workflow.
Customization Options: Offers extensive personalization for specific needs.
Comprehensive Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for users.
Secure Platform: Maintains integrity with robust security features.

In specific industries, GitLab serves as a backbone for source code management and CI/CD implementation. Companies leverage its capabilities for infrastructure management and deployment automation, thus streamlining project delivery timelines. Its ability to handle configuration management and code repositories effectively aids in maintaining development lifecycles, making it a preferred choice for organizations committed to enhancing their DevOps practices.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

1. NASA 2. IBM 3. Sony 4. Alibaba 5. CERN 6. Siemens 7. Volkswagen 8. ING 9. Ticketmaster 10. SpaceX 11. Adobe 12. Intuit 13. Autodesk 14. Rakuten 15. Unity Technologies 16. Pandora 17. Electronic Arts 18. Nordstrom 19. Verizon 20. Comcast 21. Philips 22. Deutsche Telekom 23. Orange 24. Fujitsu 25. Ericsson 26. Nokia 27. General Electric 28. Cisco 29. Accenture 30. Deloitte 31. PwC 32. KPMG

GitHub CoPilot vs. GitLab