Top 10 AWS CodePipeline Alternatives

4.2 out of 5

22 reviews
95% willing to recommend

Top AWS CodePipeline Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to AWS CodePipeline based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitLab, Jenkins, and Tekton. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Amazon Web Services (AWS), and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

GitLab

4.3 out of 5

GitLab

4.3 out of 5

Users have expressed satisfaction with various aspects, highlighting its quality, functionality, and value for money. They appreciate its user-friendly interface and the convenience it offers.

Additionally, users have praised the prompt and helpful customer support provided. Some users have also mentioned the product's durability and reliability.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. GitLab Report

Pricing

I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.

The price is okay.

View comparison

Pricing

I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month.

The price is okay.

Jenkins

4.0 out of 5

Jenkins

4.0 out of 5

Jenkins offers extensive customization with numerous plugins, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline provides seamless AWS service integration, suitable for cloud-centric deployments. Jenkins saves on costs, while AWS CodePipeline reduces operational overhead with its managed infrastructure and support services.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. Jenkins Report

Pricing

Jenkins setup costs involve initial server expenses and maintenance, while AWS CodePipeline charges a pay-as-you-go fee structure, highlighting a cost difference in upfront payments versus scalable pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

Tekton

3.8 out of 5

Tekton

3.8 out of 5

Tekton suits developers in Kubernetes environments due to customization and microservices support. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline fits well with AWS-native workflows, offering seamless integration. Tekton is open-source, reducing costs, while AWS CodePipeline's pay-as-you-go model aligns costs with usage.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton Report

Pricing

Tekton offers a cost-effective setup, while AWS CodePipeline involves higher initial costs.

View comparison

Pricing

Tekton offers a cost-effective setup, while AWS CodePipeline involves higher initial costs.

Bamboo

3.7 out of 5

Bamboo

3.7 out of 5

Bamboo excels in integrating with Atlassian products, offering flexibility in custom pipelines, which attracts users seeking tailored CI/CD processes. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline seamlessly integrates with AWS services, offering reliability and scalability, appealing to those invested in AWS's comprehensive cloud ecosystem.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. Bamboo Report

Pricing

Bamboo offers a lower setup cost, while AWS CodePipeline is pricier but provides extensive integration capabilities. These differences highlight the affordability of Bamboo against the comprehensive features of AWS CodePipeline.

View comparison

Pricing

GitHub Actions

4.3 out of 5

GitHub Actions

4.3 out of 5

AWS CodePipeline excels in integration within AWS, offering high security, but faces cloud compatibility challenges. In comparison, GitHub Actions integrates easily with GitHub and third-party tools, providing workflow flexibility, attracting users outside the AWS ecosystem.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. GitHub Actions Report

Pricing

AWS CodePipeline involves upfront setup with configuration requiring investment, while GitHub Actions offers simplicity in initial setup with lower initial costs, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

TeamCity

4.1 out of 5

TeamCity

4.1 out of 5

TeamCity offers extensive plugin support and flexibility, making it suitable for complex CI/CD pipelines with multiple integrations. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline integrates seamlessly within AWS services, enhancing deployment with centralized management, appealing to users operating predominantly within the AWS ecosystem.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. TeamCity Report

Pricing

TeamCity's setup cost is minimal with straightforward configuration, contrasting AWS CodePipeline, which involves higher initial setup expenses and complexity.

View comparison

Pricing

TeamCity's setup cost is minimal with straightforward configuration, contrasting AWS CodePipeline, which involves higher initial setup expenses and complexity.

Harness

3.8 out of 5

Harness

3.8 out of 5

Harness offers cost efficiency and customer support, focusing on automation and reducing manual intervention. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline provides a comprehensive feature set with extensive integration capabilities, making it suitable for enterprises heavily utilizing AWS infrastructure, prioritizing long-term ROI through seamless scalability.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. Harness Report

Pricing

Harness has a more straightforward initial setup, reducing time and effort needed for deployment, whereas AWS CodePipeline may involve higher setup costs with more complex configurations required at the outset.

View comparison

Pricing

CircleCI

3.3 out of 5

CircleCI

3.3 out of 5

CircleCI offers customization with Docker images and caching, appealing to teams valuing flexibility. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline provides AWS service integration, suiting complex AWS environments. CircleCI's simple deployment and support attract smaller teams, whereas AWS CodePipeline supports detailed AWS-centric operations.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI Report

Pricing

CircleCI's setup cost is straightforward, while AWS CodePipeline may involve complex pricing due to its integration with various AWS services.

View comparison

Pricing

CircleCI's setup cost is straightforward, while AWS CodePipeline may involve complex pricing due to its integration with various AWS services.

GoCD

3.8 out of 5

GoCD

3.8 out of 5

GoCD's customizable workflows and value stream mapping appeal to those seeking control and attractive pricing. In comparison, AWS CodePipeline offers seamless AWS integrations and scalability, ideal for enterprises prioritizing cloud-native capabilities and comprehensive features in a pay-as-you-go model.

Download AWS CodePipeline vs. GoCD Report

Pricing

GoCD offers a lower setup cost compared to AWS CodePipeline, making it a more affordable option. AWS CodePipeline, on the other hand, provides a more complex initial setup that can be costlier for users.

View comparison

Pricing

Bitrise

1 out of 5

Bitrise

1 out of 5

Bitrise helps you automate your daily app development tasks from building through testing to deployment. With Bitrise you can configure these tasks with a unique, visual workflow editor, with over 200 service integrations ready to roll. All integrations or steps are Open Source, which means that you can easily create your own and share it with others.

View comparison

Related categories

Build Automation

Application Security Tools

Release Automation