AWS CodePipeline vs Tekton comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.1% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.

AWS CodePipeline

Read 22 AWS CodePipeline reviews

3,041 Views
2,409 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 36 Tekton reviews

5,445 Views
3,352 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and Tekton based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 6.1%, down from 9.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.0%, up from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."

"AWS CodePipeline has valuable integration features."

"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."

"Different applications can be enhanced with AWS CodePipeline"

"Code deployment is the best feature."

"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."

"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."

"AWS CodePipeline's most valuable feature is its seamless integration with other AWS services, making it easier to orchestrate deployment processes."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"Tekton is a stable product."

"I find it beneficial to show data from Tekton to another GitHub or Bitbucket pipeline."

"Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively."

"When you run a pipeline, all the jobs are called. It is a very valuable feature that enhances job maintenance overall."

"The tool's most valuable aspect is its compatibility with the cloud-native environment. It can be easily installed on Kubernetes and leverages its resources to run CI/CD pipelines."

"We just have some configuration files, and it will handle the deployments smoother and faster compared to CI/CD 2.0."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its cloud-native and Kubernetes-ready design."

"It is an open-source tool, which makes it highly adaptable."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"AWS CodePipeline is quite a simple tool mostly for management and creating automation."

"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."

"The tool does not provide automated features for evidence collection."

"AWS CodePipeline functions well, but there's room for improvement in providing technical support to regular customers who haven't purchased developer support. I mean, having it available for everyone, even if it's not a 24-hour service. It would be more useful if specific support hours were available for assistance."

"It would be a much better tool if it could be made compatible with other cloud services as well since this is an area the product currently lacks."

"While CodePipeline's UI has improved, further enhancements in user experience are necessary to make it more intuitive."

"I would appreciate if we don't have to install any agents, even for EC2, to deploy using CodeDeploy into EC2 servers. It would help if AWS allows application deployment without requiring the Fortify agent installation."

"It would be best if AWS CodePipeline provided multiple integration options directly by providing some URLs."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"Improvement is needed in the build step."

"Some of the tool's cons include its minimalistic dashboard, which lacks detailed information and control compared to other tools like Jenkins or GitLab. Additionally, it's primarily used by Japanese companies."

"One area where Tekton can improve is log management."

"The user interface of Tekton could be improved."

"Initially, working with YAML configuration can be challenging using the solution."

"When we started with Tekton around 2021 or early 2022, the community support was somewhat limited, which posed challenges when dealing with issues or debugging. We had to rely on Red Hat OpenShift support to overcome these challenges. However, I believe that these issues will naturally improve over timeas the developer community grows stronger. From a technical perspective, I haven't had the opportunity to deeply evaluate the product end-to-end, especially in the past year or so, when I've been less involved with it."

"The product's UI could be improved, as there are occasional latency issues. The triggering part, especially the CRD installation needs enhancement."

"Tekton lacks integration capabilities compared to other CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."

"AWS charges you based on the number of pipelines you have and how active they are, and I also think that the root account user knows about all the price-related metrics."

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model."

"The pricing is manageable."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free of cost."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 64% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 13% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 9% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 6% of the time

Bamboo vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 34% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 27% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

Bazel vs Tekton

Compared 1% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline

February 2025

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

January 2025

Download Tekton product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

No data available

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton

January 2025

Free Report: AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.