AWS CodePipeline vs Tekton comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 5.7% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.

AWS CodePipeline

Read 22 AWS CodePipeline reviews

2,709 Views
2,128 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 36 Tekton reviews

4,811 Views
3,186 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Tekton and AWS CodePipeline both compete in the CI/CD solutions category. AWS CodePipeline has the advantage due to its comprehensive integration options within the AWS ecosystem, offering streamlined deployment processes.

Features: Tekton provides a Kubernetes-native solution with significant customization options for CI/CD pipelines, supports isolated environments for feature branches, and allows seamless scaling. AWS CodePipeline offers a highly integrated environment with AWS services, ensures smooth orchestration of deployments, and provides comprehensive AWS service integration.

Room for Improvement: Tekton needs better integration with non-Kubernetes tools, improved documentation, and reduced complexity for developers. AWS CodePipeline could enhance multi-cloud support, expand third-party tool integrations, and improve user experience beyond AWS-centric environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tekton benefits from OpenShift integration and strong community support but requires better onboarding and documentation. AWS CodePipeline provides straightforward deployment in public cloud environments and seamless AWS tool integration, but lacks robust multi-cloud capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Tekton is open-source with minimal direct costs but has potential maintenance overheads. AWS CodePipeline follows a pay-as-you-go model, which can become costly when using multiple AWS services, requiring careful cost-benefit analysis within the AWS ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,862 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 5.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.3%, up from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."

"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."

"The solution's technical support responds whenever you have an issue, especially whenever you need something sorted out from their side."

"I prefer using CodePipeline and CodeBuild in AWS due to their integration with AWS services, like directly deploying to ECS using Cloud Deploy."

"AWS CodePipeline's most valuable feature is its seamless integration with other AWS services, making it easier to orchestrate deployment processes."

"The management of CodeBuild and CodeDeploy on a three-point trigger basis is an important feature."

"The integration with other applications is fabulous."

"AWS CodePipeline offers multiple integrations and it has its own set of features in the area of code scanning and dynamic code testing."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"The flexibility of Tekton is the most valuable feature"

"Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments."

"Tekton is a cloud-native solution. It offers optimal resource consumption, allowing tasks to be run more efficiently and at a lower cost."

"I find it beneficial to show data from Tekton to another GitHub or Bitbucket pipeline."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its wireless capability, which makes installation easy and sets up the flow."

"The most valuable features of Tekton include the reusability of tasks, the clean UI interface, and the binding of services and secrets."

"The product's best feature is its ease of implementation."

"Tekton provides a feature where you can schedule the job."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"It would be best if AWS CodePipeline provided multiple integration options directly by providing some URLs."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"From my perspective, some in-built capabilities could be enhanced."

"While CodePipeline's UI has improved, further enhancements in user experience are necessary to make it more intuitive."

"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."

"AWS CodePipeline is quite a simple tool mostly for management and creating automation."

"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."

"I would appreciate if we don't have to install any agents, even for EC2, to deploy using CodeDeploy into EC2 servers. It would help if AWS allows application deployment without requiring the Fortify agent installation."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"RBAC is really needed for Tekton."

"The tool should improve in terms of output flexibility. It runs on a specific Kubernetes machine, and the persistent memory storage is on a single partition. Improving this aspect could make analyzing logs and toolchain outputs from external tools easier."

"The product's documentation is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."

"For infrastructure deployment, integration is somewhat complex, especially when using Terraform with Tekton. It would be beneficial if this process were simplified."

"Improvements could include introducing a UI-based pipeline development feature, such as drag and drop, which would help individuals with limited technical knowledge start building pipelines."

"Tekton should include many features to integrate event-driven pipelines."

"Tekton could improve by adding better documentation."

"While Tekton is highly effective for Kubernetes-based setups, it might not suit users who require more control over bare-metal environments."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the product depends on how many times you run it. The tool offers a pay-as-you-go model."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"AWS charges you based on the number of pipelines you have and how active they are, and I also think that the root account user knows about all the price-related metrics."

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."

"AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."

"AWS offers free business or enterprise support services."

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free and open-source."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The solution is open-source."

"The product is free of cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 65% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 11% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 8% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 7% of the time

Harness vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 33% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

GoCD vs Tekton

Compared 1% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline

April 2025

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

March 2025

Download Tekton product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

No data available

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton

April 2025

Free Report: AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodePipeline vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.