GoCD vs Tekton comparison

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"The UI is colorful."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its cloud-native and Kubernetes-ready design."

"Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively."

"Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments."

"Tekton allows you to categorize tasks according to your needs and minimizes the amount of code needed."

"It scales automatically based on the number of tasks or pipelines running, which is efficient and effective for our development needs."

"The installation process is seamless, requiring fewer resources compared to Jenkins."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its wireless capability, which makes installation easy and sets up the flow."

"I like the setup of the dashboard."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"Configuring Tekton requires a deep understanding of Kubernetes, which can be difficult for developers."

"If you are a beginner, then accessing the flexibility part can be overwhelming. We think the learning curve of the tool is steep, especially for those who are not already familiar with Kubernetes."

"The product's documentation is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."

"For infrastructure deployment, integration is somewhat complex, especially when using Terraform with Tekton. It would be beneficial if this process were simplified."

"Tekton should have more accessibility for some rare use cases so that we can have more references when applying some techniques to our pipeline."

"The product's version update management process needs improvement."

"The user interface of Tekton could be improved."

"One area where Tekton can improve is log management."

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

"The product is free of cost."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The solution is open-source."