GoCD vs Tekton comparison

Thoughtworks and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Thoughtworks is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.5, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Thoughtworks holds a 1.5% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Thoughtworks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.

GoCD

Read 7 GoCD reviews

672 Views
508 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 36 Tekton reviews

5,137 Views
3,266 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

GoCD

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

GoCD and Tekton are competing in the CI/CD space. GoCD has an advantage in ease of deployment and customer service, while Tekton's advanced features and Kubernetes-native architecture position it well for modern enterprises.

Features: GoCD offers pipeline modeling, visualization of workflows, and value stream mapping. Tekton provides a Kubernetes-native design, flexible architecture, and seamless integration for advanced cloud-native environments.

Room for Improvement: GoCD can enhance its plugin architecture and expand community support. It could also improve UI to compete with newer tools. Tekton needs better log visibility and real-time troubleshooting guidance. Its deployment complexity may deter traditional IT setups, and customer support options could be expanded.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GoCD features straightforward deployment and reliable customer service, making it suitable for traditional infrastructures. Tekton requires detailed Kubernetes knowledge for deployment but boasts extensive community resources for support.

Pricing and ROI: GoCD features lower setup costs, ideal for budget-conscious businesses, while Tekton incurs higher initial expenses but promises high ROI for businesses focused on scalability and modern integrations.

To learn more, read our detailed GoCD vs. Tekton Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. Tekton

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GoCD

Ranking in Build Automation

15th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (15th), Release Automation (8th)

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GoCD is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.1%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

RajeshReddy

Dev Ops Engineer at Infosys

The UI is colorful, but the user experience must be improved

We can see all the pipelines with a simple search. The UI is colorful. The user experience is very rich. The product is very easy to learn if we know a bit of the basics. If we have someone to show us how to use it, it is very easy.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"The UI is colorful."

"The 'promote' feature is beneficial as it simplifies deployment processes by allowing easy promotion of applications to different environments without needing to re-run CI/CD processes."

"The flexibility of Tekton is the most valuable feature"

"Tekton allows you to categorize tasks according to your needs and minimizes the amount of code needed."

"The tool's most valuable aspect is its compatibility with the cloud-native environment. It can be easily installed on Kubernetes and leverages its resources to run CI/CD pipelines."

"Tekton provides a feature where you can schedule the job."

"It enables enterprises to build a flexible framework atop Tekton, making it easier to define workflows with standard inputs and outputs."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its cloud-native and Kubernetes-ready design."

"The most valuable features of Tekton include the reusability of tasks, the clean UI interface, and the binding of services and secrets."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"Some of the tool's cons include its minimalistic dashboard, which lacks detailed information and control compared to other tools like Jenkins or GitLab. Additionally, it's primarily used by Japanese companies."

"One area where Tekton can improve is log management."

"When we started with Tekton around 2021 or early 2022, the community support was somewhat limited, which posed challenges when dealing with issues or debugging. We had to rely on Red Hat OpenShift support to overcome these challenges. However, I believe that these issues will naturally improve over timeas the developer community grows stronger. From a technical perspective, I haven't had the opportunity to deeply evaluate the product end-to-end, especially in the past year or so, when I've been less involved with it."

"The product's version update management process needs improvement."

"It would be better if Tekton could show the YAML file while it is running, similar to GitHub pipelines, to provide more visibility on what's happening."

"Initially, working with YAML configuration can be challenging using the solution."

"Tekton could improve by adding better documentation."

"The product's documentation is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

"The solution is open-source."

"The product is free of cost."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free and open-source."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Retailer

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GoCD?

The UI is colorful.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoCD?

The product is free of cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoCD?

One area of product improvement is the access control system. It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be sim...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs GoCD

Compared 40% of the time

Jenkins vs GoCD

Compared 24% of the time

GitHub Actions vs GoCD

Compared 15% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs GoCD

Compared 9% of the time

More GoCD Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 34% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs Tekton

Compared 1% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

March 2025

Download GoCD product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

March 2025

Download Tekton product report

Also Known As

Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go

No data available

Overview

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.

Thoughtworks

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

GoCD vs. Tekton

March 2025

Free Report: GoCD vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about GoCD vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoCD vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.