GoCD vs Tekton comparison

"The most notable aspect is its user interface, which we find to be user-friendly and straightforward for deploying and comprehending pipelines. We have the ability to create multiple pipelines, and in addition to that, the resource consumption is impressive."

"GoCD's open-source nature is valuable."

"The UI is colorful."

"Permission separations mean that we can grant limited permissions for each team or team member."

"The product's best feature is its ease of implementation."

"Tekton is a stable product."

"The installation process is seamless, requiring fewer resources compared to Jenkins."

"The tool offers flexibility and compatibility."

"One of the best things I appreciate is that Tekton runs on the Kubernetes platform. This is very useful when working on a project with other team members. For instance, suppose we have a very big project that requires building a large amount of source code or running many unit tests. During the build and unit test phases, Tekton on Kubernetes allows us to have a scalable machine to handle these tasks. This scalability is the most useful aspect for me."

"The flexibility of Tekton is the most valuable feature"

"Tekton is a cloud-native solution. It offers optimal resource consumption, allowing tasks to be run more efficiently and at a lower cost."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its cloud-native and Kubernetes-ready design."

"The tool must be more user-friendly."

"It is difficult to assign different access levels because it relies on separate keys for developer and admin access, which could be simplified."

"The aspect that requires attention is the user management component. When integrating with BitLabs and authenticating through GitLab, there are specific features we desire. One important feature is the ability to import users directly from GitLab, along with their respective designations, and assign appropriate privileges based on that information. Allocating different privileges to users is a time-consuming process for us."

"The documentation really should be improved by including real examples and more setup cases."

"The product's documentation is an area of concern, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Tekton should include many features to integrate event-driven pipelines."

"Improvement is needed in the documentation and the overall integration process."

"The tool should improve in terms of output flexibility. It runs on a specific Kubernetes machine, and the persistent memory storage is on a single partition. Improving this aspect could make analyzing logs and toolchain outputs from external tools easier."

"Configuring Tekton requires a deep understanding of Kubernetes, which can be difficult for developers."

"The product's UI could be improved, as there are occasional latency issues. The triggering part, especially the CRD installation needs enhancement."

"Initially, working with YAML configuration can be challenging using the solution."

"If you are a beginner, then accessing the flexibility part can be overwhelming. We think the learning curve of the tool is steep, especially for those who are not already familiar with Kubernetes."

"This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

"It's an open-source and free tool."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The product is free of cost."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"The solution is open-source."