GitHub Actions vs Tekton comparison

GitHub and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. GitHub holds a 8.7% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Google users who would recommend it.

GitHub Actions

Read 23 GitHub Actions reviews

2,950 Views
2,950 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 37 Tekton reviews

3,473 Views
3,473 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

GitHub Actions

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 21, 2025

Tekton and GitHub Actions provide CI/CD solutions with Tekton performing well in Kubernetes environments due to its scalability and customization, while GitHub Actions stands out for its ease of use within GitHub repositories.

Features: Tekton offers a Kubernetes-native architecture supporting cloud-native tools, customizable tasks, and scalability for complex workflows. GitHub Actions provides seamless GitHub integration facilitating straightforward CI/CD setups, supports various runners, and automates workflows with an easy learning curve.

Room for Improvement: Tekton requires better third-party tool integration, user-friendly interfaces, and enhanced YAML flexibility. GitHub Actions could improve its dashboard management, debugging capabilities, and integration options while adding AI features for increased value.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tekton offers robust support for Red Hat and OpenShift, aiding in hybrid cloud deployment with beneficial community help, though improved documentation is needed. GitHub Actions integrates seamlessly with GitHub but sometimes faces slow community support and less direct official engagement.

Pricing and ROI: Tekton is open-source, benefiting Kubernetes users with cost savings and reduced operational costs. GitHub Actions offers free basic use with expenses tied to enterprise needs, recognized for value but with premium features incurring additional charges.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub Actions vs. Tekton Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,422 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub Actions

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of GitHub Actions is 8.7%, down from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 7.9%, down from 12.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Tekton	7.9%
GitHub Actions	8.7%
Other	83.4%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Has supported repository management and demonstrates potential in workflow flexibility

While GitHub Actions offers a range of functionalities, it is newer compared to more established tools such as Jenkins and Azure DevOps. There is still room for improvement, especially in areas concerning deeper capabilities akin to those provided by Jenkins and Azure DevOps. Given the evolving nature of technology, there are potential improvements GitHub Actions can focus on, including enhancing support and reliability to match its competitors.

Read full review

reviewer2741265

Software engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Benefit from a smooth learning curve and efficient adaptability

After seeing Jenkins and Tekton, I think Tekton is quite built on top of Kubernetes, so the learning curve is minimal. If you are working with Kubernetes, then OpenShift created Tekton on top of that, making it easily adaptable. Tekton is highly customizable. With Kubernetes, we can customize on our own and create custom builders. If teams have time and want to make enhancements, they can do it themselves. Whatever OpenShift is providing regarding Tekton is sufficient. It is easy to use because we don't need to write every pod step every time. A proper DevOps engineer can help once or twice, and development teams can easily adapt to that, make small shell script changes in the steps, understand the process, and work with it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It saves a lot of time with GitHub Actions; especially, the whole process if done manually might cost us a lot, maybe a week or two weeks just for deployment, but now with automation, we automate the deployment effectively."

"I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building processes. It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, so there's no extra configuration needed, making the building process easy and efficient. GitHub Actions handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurations. We haven't yet explored GitHub Actions' support for AI projects, as we haven't used its AI capabilities."

"It is easy to use, especially if you are accustomed to using GitHub."

"The main benefit is collaboration. It allows us to easily collaborate with other developers, regardless of location. For example, we can collaborate with both our African and German colleagues seamlessly. It's platform-agnostic, so it is flexible and not tied to any OS, so we can work on Linux, Windows, web, and even Oracle applications. It's flexible, reliable, and overall an excellent tool for our needs."

"It is a very stable solution as we have not faced any issues."

"GitHub Actions helps automate the deployment process, eliminating manual copying and testing, which saves time and minimizes errors."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a good product that offers stability and performance."

"GitHub Actions is valuable for its ease of use and integration."

More GitHub Actions pros

"It is an open-source tool, which makes it highly adaptable."

"Tekton is highly customizable, with Kubernetes, we can customize on our own and create custom builders."

"Tekton's inclusion in Kubernetes deployment offers better visibility on how Tekton is performing within a cluster. It is lightweight and not as heavy as Jenkins to maintain."

"Tekton is customizable because with Kubernetes, we can customize on our own."

"Tekton is an orchestrator. It provides seamless integration for our pipelines. It offers robust support for executing tasks within the pipeline, allowing us to set up and run pipelines quickly."

"The 'promote' feature is beneficial as it simplifies deployment processes by allowing easy promotion of applications to different environments without needing to re-run CI/CD processes."

"The installation process is seamless, requiring fewer resources compared to Jenkins."

"Tekton allows you to categorize tasks according to your needs and minimizes the amount of code needed."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"The solution's integration capabilities and UI are areas of concern where improvement is required to make the product more user-friendly."

"Sometimes it is quite complex to commit code from our local system to the GitHub repository; creating a folder in GitHub can be tedious."

"The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex."

"My company would want to see some AI features in the tool as it can add value to the product."

"In terms of improvements, I think better logging for debugging purposes would be helpful, especially for complex workflows."

"While GitHub Actions offers a range of functionalities, it is newer compared to more established tools such as Jenkins and Azure DevOps. There is still room for improvement, especially in areas concerning deeper capabilities akin to those provided by Jenkins and Azure DevOps."

"GitHub Actions lacks a feature for automating the build process for mobile applications."

"We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter."

More GitHub Actions cons

"Tekton is a good product with all the features I need. There isn't anything that needs improvement."

"The product's version update management process needs improvement."

"Incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future."

"While Tekton is highly effective for Kubernetes-based setups, it might not suit users who require more control over bare-metal environments."

"It would be beneficial to find case studies or more information on complex implementations."

"Some of the tool's cons include its minimalistic dashboard, which lacks detailed information and control compared to other tools like Jenkins or GitLab. Additionally, it's primarily used by Japanese companies."

"It tends to occupy a significant amount of disk space on the node, which could potentially pose challenges."

"Tekton lacks integration capabilities compared to other CI/CD tools like Jenkins and Travis."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The product is free of cost."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?

I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?

I would rate pricing a seven, which leans toward the expensive side. However, there is still value for money, and that's why we continue using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

I didn't get the intention of scalability. Scalability means based on the load, it will automatically gain resources and run. The question of pipeline scalability remains unclear. It's quite easy t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Tekton?

We use Tekton for build and deployments. For LMP testing, we use the Tekton pipeline. We also use GitHub CI/CD. For infrastructure pipelines and Infrastructure as Code (IaC), we use Tekton. Previou...

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs GitHub Actions

Compared 14% of the time

TeamCity vs GitHub Actions

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs GitHub Actions

Compared 8% of the time

Buildkite vs GitHub Actions

Compared 7% of the time

Bitrise vs GitHub Actions

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Actions Competitors

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 24% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 7% of the time

Bamboo vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

CircleCI vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions

December 2025

Download GitHub Actions product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

December 2025

Download Tekton product report

Overview

GitHub Actions streamlines CI/CD processes with an intuitive YAML workflow and robust automation, enhancing efficiency and integration with third-party tools and cloud providers.

GitHub Actions automates development pipelines, supports scalable public and private runners, and manages secure secrets. This tool integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS, Kubernetes, Google Cloud, and Databricks. It enhances DevOps workflows with reliable task automation. Users note areas for UI and deployment tool improvements, artifact management simplification, and additional programming language support. Debugging complexity and hosting agent transitions pose challenges, along with integration enhancements for tools like OneDrive.

What are GitHub Actions' key features?

YAML Workflow Creation: Simplifies configuration with intuitive YAML.
CI/CD Integration: Provides seamless integration within DevOps pipelines.
Automation Capabilities: Automates tasks with minimal manual intervention.
Third-Party Tool Compatibility: Works well with diverse tools and platforms.
Secure Secrets Management: Protects sensitive information effectively.

What benefits do users find in GitHub Actions?

Enhanced Performance: Boosts task execution speed and reliability.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible runner options.
Improved Release Cycles: Ensures consistent updates and deployments.
Workflow Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.

Companies in tech and software development frequently utilize GitHub Actions for integrating, deploying, and versioning projects. It is often employed for deploying applications to cloud environments like AWS and Kubernetes, managing extensive CI/CD workflows, and automating test and security operations, thereby streamlining production cycles across industries.

GitHub

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

December 2025

Free Report: GitHub Actions vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub Actions vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub Actions vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.