GitHub Actions vs Tekton comparison

"We can trigger files manually or automate processes."

"It offers numerous built-in features for pipeline management, release management, and even work item tracking on boards, which makes it a versatile tool that seamlessly integrates with hardware and facilitates optimization."

"GitHub Actions helps automate the deployment process, eliminating manual copying and testing, which saves time and minimizes errors."

"The level of automation achievable is really good. So, the custom workflow creation and Marketplace Actions improved our project's efficiency."

"I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to just 8 to 10 minutes through these optimizations."

"I find the automation feature of GitHub Actions most valuable for our building processes. It integrates seamlessly with GitHub, so there's no extra configuration needed, making the building process easy and efficient. GitHub Actions handles scalability well, automatically managing execution infrastructure without requiring additional configurations. We haven't yet explored GitHub Actions' support for AI projects, as we haven't used its AI capabilities."

"It is user-friendly, with clear and organized processes, making it easy to navigate and work with."

"GitHub Actions is a beautiful tool that integrates smoothly with all major tools, reducing CI/CD work by 30% to 40%."

"I like the branching and visualization tools for the pipeline."

"Tekton is an orchestrator. It provides seamless integration for our pipelines. It offers robust support for executing tasks within the pipeline, allowing us to set up and run pipelines quickly."

"It is an open-source tool, which makes it highly adaptable."

"We can make a lot of customizations, and data sharing between tasks using workspaces is very convenient."

"I find it beneficial to show data from Tekton to another GitHub or Bitbucket pipeline."

"The most valuable features of Tekton include the reusability of tasks, the clean UI interface, and the binding of services and secrets."

"When you run a pipeline, all the jobs are called. It is a very valuable feature that enhances job maintenance overall."

"The ability to scale is valuable."

"GitHub sometimes makes it difficult to debug actions."

"The reporting capabilities are somewhat limited."

"The UI could be better."

"The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex."

"We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter."

"Switching between hosted and self-hosted agents can be a bit complex, as self-hosted agents need to be provisioned in platforms like Azure or AWS."

"There is a part that detects outdated libraries. If that feature could be more intuitive and informative, that would be nice."

"The solution's integration capabilities and UI are areas of concern where improvement is required to make the product more user-friendly."

"It would be beneficial to find case studies or more information on complex implementations."

"Tekton could improve by adding better documentation."

"It tends to occupy a significant amount of disk space on the node, which could potentially pose challenges."

"While Tekton is highly effective for Kubernetes-based setups, it might not suit users who require more control over bare-metal environments."

"The tool should improve in terms of output flexibility. It runs on a specific Kubernetes machine, and the persistent memory storage is on a single partition. Improving this aspect could make analyzing logs and toolchain outputs from external tools easier."

"Improvement is needed in the build step."

"Improvement is needed in the documentation and the overall integration process."

"Configuring Tekton requires a deep understanding of Kubernetes, which can be difficult for developers."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free of cost."

"The solution is open-source."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."