AWS CodePipeline vs Jenkins comparison

Read 93 Jenkins reviews

4,377 Views
3,762 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and AWS CodePipeline are competitive solutions in the CI/CD category. Based on the comparison, Jenkins shows more adaptability due to its plugin versatility and open-source nature, while AWS CodePipeline offers streamlined integration within AWS services.

Features: Jenkins stands out with its extensive plugin ecosystem, providing an adaptable and customizable pipeline environment suitable for diverse CI/CD setups. It offers open-source flexibility and robust integration capabilities, benefiting from strong community support. AWS CodePipeline, on the other hand, is optimized for AWS environments, offering seamless integration with AWS services and a scalable cloud-native solution. Its integration features are complemented by tools like CodeBuild and CodeDeploy, which simplify complex deployments.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins could improve in areas like UI polish, plugin stability, and easing setup complexities, especially for cloud integrations. Enhancing documentation, centralized management, and cloud-native features are also necessary. AWS CodePipeline would benefit from expanding multi-cloud compatibility, real-time pipeline analytics, and broadening built-in integrations beyond the AWS ecosystem, requiring more flexibility to meet diverse customization needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins offers flexibility with on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud deployments, suitable for various architectural demands, but relies on community support for technical assistance without formal customer service. AWS CodePipeline focuses on public cloud environments within the AWS infrastructure, facilitating integrated support with a subscription model while lacking Jenkins's deployment versatility.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins, being open-source, provides substantial cost savings with no licensing fees, attracting cost-conscious organizations seeking high ROI through automation and efficiency improvements. AWS CodePipeline operates on a pay-as-you-go model, offering transparent and controlled expenses tied to AWS service usage, which scales costs with pipeline activity and suits cloud-native deployments but may increase costs for extensive builds.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: March 2025).

AWS CodePipeline vs. Jenkins

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 6.0%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 10.6%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

Dinesh-Patil

Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment

The dashboard needs to be improved. Though the access management and authentication functionalities are present, the dashboard and UI could be more user-friendly. The product has many plug-ins. Users have to go through the documentation to be able to use the product. The UI must be more user-friendly. The information should be available in the dashboard itself. The users shouldn’t have to refer to the documentation. When a user hovers over the elements on the dashboard, it should reveal information about them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In AWS, the Cloud DevOps is a managed service from CodeCommit and this has removed the need for a lot of manual steps."

"The best thing about AWS CodePipeline is that we don't have to manage agents."

"The integrations are good."

"Code deployment is the best feature."

"Another big advantage is observability."

"The product is cost-effective and integrates well with the AWS environment."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodePipeline is the flexibility of the configuration."

"The management of CodeBuild and CodeDeploy on a three-point trigger basis is an important feature."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"We use Jenkins to automatically build Python binaries into several OS's i.e. OS X, Ubuntu, Windows 32-bit and Windows 64-bit."

"The automated elements are easy to use and you can put them into your server."

"Jenkins is free and open source."

"Jenkins is very easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration between different tools."

"For business needs, Jenkins is the most relevant choice because it can be self-hosted, the price is good, it’s robust, and requires almost no effort for maintenance."

"Jenkins is a very mature product."

"Jenkins is very stable."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"If there are many dependancies involved in the setup, it may take a long time."

"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."

"While CodePipeline's UI has improved, further enhancements in user experience are necessary to make it more intuitive."

"AWS CodePipeline works effectively, and I haven't identified any specific areas needing improvement as it has been quite satisfying in terms of deployment needs."

"In the next release, I would like to see fewer timeout errors."

"From my perspective, some in-built capabilities could be enhanced."

"The product’s pricing needs improvement."

"I would appreciate if we don't have to install any agents, even for EC2, to deploy using CodeDeploy into EC2 servers. It would help if AWS allows application deployment without requiring the Fortify agent installation."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"It does not have a very user-friendly interface."

"The solution's UI can use a facelift and the logs can use more detailed information."

"There are some difficulties when we need to execute the DB script."

"Centralized user management would be helpful."

"Jenkins could have better cloud functionality. Currently, we are using the existing legacy model, but we are moving toward the cloud, so it would be great if they could improve in that area. In the future, I would like more cloud features and related training materials, like a video tutorial."

"For this solution to be a 10, it has to be a lot more stable. Maybe the public version of Jenkins is stable, but in our case it's not stable."

"This solution could be improved by removing the storage of unnecessary data such as the history of test deployments that were unsuccessful."

"Sometimes you have Jenkins restarting because of OOM errors."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is manageable."

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."

"It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model."

"The price of the product depends on how many times you run it. The tool offers a pay-as-you-go model."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"AWS charges you based on the number of pipelines you have and how active they are, and I also think that the root account user knows about all the price-related metrics."

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

"Jenkins is a free open-source server."

"This is an open-source solution for the basic features. However, if an organization wishes to include specific functionality, outside of the basic package, there are extra costs involved."

"In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution."

"The solution is open source."

"Jenkins is open source."

"It is free."

"It is a free product."

"There is no cost. It is open source."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

GitLab vs AWS CodePipeline

Comparisons

Compared 65% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 10% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 6% of the time

Tekton vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 3% of the time

Harness vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 3% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 15% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 10% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Rational Build Forge vs Jenkins

Compared 6% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodePipeline

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Download Jenkins product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

No data available

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

AWS CodePipeline vs. Jenkins