Harness vs Jenkins comparison

Harness and Jenkins are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Harness is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Jenkins is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Harness holds a 6.9% mindshare in BA, compared to Jenkins’s 9.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Harness users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Jenkins users who would recommend it.

Harness

Read 5 Harness reviews

2,388 Views
1,982 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Jenkins

Read 92 Jenkins reviews

3,400 Views
3,332 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Harness

Jenkins

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and Harness compete in the continuous integration and delivery space. Jenkins, favored for cost and support, shows strengths in customization, while Harness stands out in features, offering value through advanced automation and analytics.

Features: Jenkins offers open-source accessibility, an extensive plugin ecosystem, and high customization potential. Harness, contrastingly, provides advanced automation capabilities, robust analytics tools, and seamless workflow integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins requires a complex setup and maintenance, reflective of its evolving community-driven support. Harness simplifies deployment with dedicated customer service, emphasizing ease of use and reliable assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins's open-source model reduces initial costs, appealing to organizations capable of handling its complexities, enhancing its ROI. Harness, despite its higher upfront investment, promises quicker returns through enhanced productivity via advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Harness vs. Jenkins Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Harness vs. Jenkins

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 870,697 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Harness

Ranking in Build Automation

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (18th), Cloud Cost Management (8th)

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Harness is 6.9%, up from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 9.1%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Jenkins	9.1%
Harness	6.9%
Other	84.0%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Linwei Yuan

Software Engineer at Citi

Streamline microservices deployment with integrated execution pipelines and comprehensive monitoring

Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place. It is very convenient since we have many microservices, so having one platform for all of them is beneficial. The dashboard allows me to monitor all core services' deployment status in one place, making it easier to find bugs and check logs.

Read full review

Annamalai Pts

DevOps Engineer at Tech Mahindra Limited

Streamlined CI/CD pipelines with powerful integration and an easy setup

I use Jenkins as a CI/CD tool. We create pipelines using Jenkins, with stages for Maven builds, Docker image builds, SonarQube integration, and deploying the image to a Kubernetes cluster, AWS EKS Jenkins has made the developers' work very easy. They commit to the remote repository, and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The features of Harness are valuable, supporting rolling deployments, basic deployments, and blue-green deployments with zero downtime."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place, making it convenient."

"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."

"Harness starts integrating with organizations, making everything automated without the need for manual interruption."

"Harness integrates all functions like execution pipelines, environment checks, and log monitoring in one place."

"Everything in Harness is configured and runs smoothly."

"Jenkins' most valuable feature is Pipeline."

"The solution is scalable and has a large number of plugins that can help you scale it to your needs."

"It can scale easily."

"We benefit from Kubernetes' ability to autoscale pods and use horizontal pod autoscalers to adjust the number of pods based on metrics like CPU or memory usage, ensuring efficient resource allocation and stability under load."

"Jenkins allows us to automate deployment, so I no longer have to do it manually. That's the primary use case. The other advantage of Jenkins is that it's open source. It was free for me to download and install. It's a product that's been in use for many years, so I can find a lot of support online for any issues that I may encounter while configuring anything for a given use case."

"This is a great integration tool and very powerful."

"I like that you can find a wide range of plugins for Jenkins."

"The most valuable feature of Jenkins is its open source."

More Jenkins pros

Cons

"Even with automation, there's a requirement for manual change requests for approvals."

"When deploying multiple components to multiple environments, like production and BCP, failures sometimes occur. Improvements are needed when deploying one component to one environment."

"I prefer the previous less compact UI version of Harness, which showed more details on the screen."

"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."

"Harness setup and configurations could be made easier to configure, which would be helpful."

"When integrating Harness with more than twenty applications in one place, it becomes less stable, causing improvements to be necessary."

"There is no way for the cloud repositories to trigger Jenkins."

"We sometimes face challenges during version upgrades, such as failures when migrating Kubernetes versions."

"Some kind of SaaS product would be helpful in providing organizational structure."

"We need more licensed product integrations."

"Upgrading and maintaining plugins can be painful, as sometimes upgrading a plugin can break functionality of another plugin that a job is dependent on."

"This solution could be improved by removing the storage of unnecessary data such as the history of test deployments that were unsuccessful."

"I would like to have an integrated dashboard on top of it and a better UX to look at. The dashboard could be better in terms of integration with other tools. We should be able to have a single pane of glass across all the tools that we use where Jenkins is the pipeline. This can be a very good upgrade to it."

"It does not have a very user-friendly interface."

More Jenkins cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Jenkins is open-source, so it is free."

"Jenkins is an open-source platform."

"The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version."

"Jenkins is open source and free."

"In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution."

"Jenkins is not expensive and reasonably priced."

"It is an open source."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There is not a license required to use the solution because it is open-source."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	56

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Harness?

It's a highly customizable DevOps tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Harness?

Harness setup and configurations could be made easier to configure, which would be helpful.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Harness?

In Harness, we are basically using Canary type deployments. We have applications, web applications, and web servers. Whenever we get the WAR file with 50 servers in a load balancer, Harness will de...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Harness

Compared 19% of the time

TeamCity vs Harness

Compared 10% of the time

GitLab vs Harness

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs Harness

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs Harness

Compared 6% of the time

More Harness Competitors

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 15% of the time

JFrog Pipeline vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

TeamCity vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Harness

October 2025

Download Harness product report

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

October 2025

Download Jenkins product report

Also Known As

Armory

No data available

Overview

Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.

Harness

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

Sample Customers

Linedata, Openbank, Home Depot, Advanced

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Buyer's Guide

Harness vs. Jenkins

September 2025

Free Report: Harness vs. Jenkins

Find out what your peers are saying about Harness vs. Jenkins and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Harness vs. Jenkins report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.