

Jenkins and Harness compete in the continuous integration and delivery space. Jenkins, favored for cost and support, shows strengths in customization, while Harness stands out in features, offering value through advanced automation and analytics.
Features: Jenkins offers open-source accessibility, an extensive plugin ecosystem, and high customization potential. Harness, contrastingly, provides advanced automation capabilities, robust analytics tools, and seamless workflow integration.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins requires a complex setup and maintenance, reflective of its evolving community-driven support. Harness simplifies deployment with dedicated customer service, emphasizing ease of use and reliable assistance.
Pricing and ROI: Jenkins's open-source model reduces initial costs, appealing to organizations capable of handling its complexities, enhancing its ROI. Harness, despite its higher upfront investment, promises quicker returns through enhanced productivity via advanced features.
The AI features that they have and with which we can rewrite the pipeline and troubleshoot issues significantly saved time.
By adopting templates and various different pipelines across our own IDP platform, we have saved upwards of 30 to 40% of development time.
With Harness, the release process decreased from three or four hours to one or two hours, making deployments much quicker.
Now, with Jenkins, they can focus on coding, push code, and Jenkins automatically manages the process, ensuring security and efficiency, thus improving productivity and decreasing shipping time.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
We have not faced any customer support issues, with tickets resolved in less than a four-day SLA.
There was an instance when I faced issues with third-party plugins, and after raising a support ticket, they responded in a few hours with a documentation link that resolved my issue.
Jenkins is a community-managed tool, so there is no native support.
Our entire organization uses it with hundreds of applications, and it supports this scale effectively.
It is able to work on our infrastructure side, which is EKS, and we are able to handle our organization growth effectively for an enterprise use case.
When I integrated Harness to more than 20 applications in one place, it becomes less stable.
It does not operate on a master-slave architecture that allows for automatic failover.
Harness is completely stable, and we are using it in production without facing any stability issues at all.
We have rarely faced issues with Harness tech support.
Harness is decently stable.
There is not a lot of good support for pipeline as code, and I often find myself not using pipeline as code the way other platforms such as GitHub Actions or Jenkins integrate pipeline as code.
Improved documentation and onboarding tutorials would help accelerate adoption.
Harness can be improved by providing more clarity on the credits it issues for Harness Cloud, as it has a tiered pricing structure involving license and credit costs, which can get confusing.
Better plugin maintainability is needed, and given the AI advancements today, AI support in Jenkins would be beneficial.
From what I understand with respect to Harness, licensing and setup costs were relatively low for an enterprise, and the pricing was more catered toward enterprises who would invest in the technology.
The licensing cost is a little bit too high.
While Jenkins is stable and can run on minimal resources, larger environments might incur higher costs due to the need for high-end VMs to run build agents.
Harness uses AI to suggest errors in case of deployment failures.
The platform also supports cloud-native environments and Kubernetes deployments, making pipeline management easier, and its automation capabilities significantly improve speed and reliability.
If something goes wrong, I can use AI troubleshooting to build or test my fails and analyze the logs, suggesting the fixes.
The best features that Jenkins offers me are high customizability along with the support of Groovy language, which allows me to write my own functions and logic to deploy applications and configure the pipeline according to my use case.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Jenkins | 10.5% |
| Harness | 4.8% |
| Other | 84.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 14 |
| Large Enterprise | 58 |
Harness offers a comprehensive toolset for automating deployment processes and enhancing software update efficiency. It's lauded for its CI/CD capabilities, feature flagging, and real-time deployment monitoring. Key features include an intuitive UI, secret management, and robust rollback functionalities, all contributing to improved productivity and reduced errors in DevOps environments.
Jenkins is an open-source automation server known for its extensive plugin ecosystem and seamless integration with a broad range of tools, enhancing CI/CD processes.
As an automation server, Jenkins streamlines development workflows by managing continuous integration and deployment with powerful pipeline support and distributed build capabilities. Its strong community backbone and ease of use contribute to its ongoing appeal. While highly versatile, Jenkins can encounter scalability and plugin management issues, with areas like cloud integration and security needing attention. It supports automation for build, test, and deployment, ensuring smoother software delivery and infrastructure management across environments.
What are Jenkins's key features?Jenkins is implemented in industries focused on continuous software delivery and infrastructure management, including technology firms, finance sectors needing robust deployment pipelines, and enterprise environments requiring complex workflow automation. Companies leverage its automation to enhance productivity and minimize errors in development processes.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.