Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bamboo vs Jenkins comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Bamboo yielded high returns with low costs, boosting efficiency and saving time, translating to significant financial gains.
Sentiment score
8.5
Jenkins provides excellent ROI by being free, enhancing satisfaction, streamlining deployment, reducing errors, and lowering costs.
Using Jenkins returns a strong investment because it significantly helps our team and organization by reducing human error and the need for fewer employees.
Site Reliability Engineer 2 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Bamboo support is generally helpful, but users note service delays and prefer forums; satisfaction rates 6 to 8 out of 10.
Sentiment score
6.5
Jenkins relies on robust community support for answers, while CloudBees offers varying response times for additional assistance.
customer support was really helpful, staying in touch until we received a permanent solution.
Site Reliability Engineer 2 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.4
Bamboo's scalability is generally praised, but opinions vary based on remote agent technology and resource allocation challenges.
Sentiment score
7.2
Jenkins is scalable and adaptable, effectively managing many jobs, with enhanced capabilities via Kubernetes and Docker integration.
If you need more agents, you just switch on more agents.
Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Jenkins' scalability is really great based on our experience; it is very stable and reliable.
Site Reliability Engineer 2 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.8
Bamboo is generally stable, with most issues resolved by upgrades; users rate it highly for robustness and stability.
Sentiment score
7.1
Jenkins is generally stable with occasional issues, but performance improves significantly with better hardware and recent updates.
 

Room For Improvement

Bamboo requires better user-friendliness, plugin support, integration, API improvements, and enhanced deployment models for enhanced developer experience.
Jenkins requires UI/UX enhancements, plugin stability, better integration, improved documentation, and more effective troubleshooting for user satisfaction.
If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses.
Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Improvements are necessary for better cloud-native scaling, auto-scaling agents, performance optimizations, and easier distributed setups.
Site Reliability Engineer 2 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Bamboo enterprise pricing starts at $2000, with agent-based fees rising to $120,000 annually, prompting calls for flexible models.
Jenkins is cost-effective and open-source, with additional costs for infrastructure and an enterprise edition offering extra features.
Jenkins' licensing cost is completely free under the open source MIT license and maintained by the Jenkins community, so there is no license fee, no per-user cost, and no subscription required.
Site Reliability Engineer 2 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Bamboo offers seamless Atlassian integration, customizable CI/CD pipelines, extensive automation, and third-party support, valued for ease of use.
Jenkins excels in automation, integration, and scalability with its robust ecosystem, enhancing collaboration, efficiency, and reliability.
The automation is really the big benefit for the CI/CD pipeline.
Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
The best feature that truly makes it an invaluable tool for DevOps teams is its ability to treat pipelines as code, its massive plugin library, and its robust support for distributed builds.
Site Reliability Engineer 2 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Bamboo
Ranking in Build Automation
11th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Jenkins
Ranking in Build Automation
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Bamboo is 4.3%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jenkins is 7.2%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Jenkins7.2%
Bamboo4.3%
Other88.5%
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Christo Louw - PeerSpot reviewer
Director at a computer software company with 11-50 employees
Automation has streamlined build and deployment workflows and provides clear project reporting
Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. However, I can't really comment on that because I haven't looked at Bamboo to assist with machine learning pipelines. If they haven't focused on building MLOps pipelines, that's definitely an area where they could assist businesses. I haven't looked at what Bamboo offers for MLOps, so it's possible that they've already built in features. Machine learning and AI are in big demand at the moment. If they haven't focused too much on MLOps, that's probably where they can improve.
KS
Site Reliability Engineer 2 at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Automation has transformed our delivery pipeline and saves time by removing manual deployment work
While Jenkins is powerful, many teams face pain points and limitations. The biggest area where Jenkins could improve, based on real DevOps use cases, is messy plugin management, which is one of the biggest complaints. Jenkins relies heavily on plugins, which is both its strength and its weakness. The problem is there are too many plugins, and version conflicts can arise between them. Updates sometimes break pipelines, which is a real pain point. For instance, if you update a Docker plugin, the pipeline could suddenly fail. Many times, using tools such as Docker or Kubernetes leads to plugin compatibility issues. Here, improvements are needed for better plugin stability, automatic compatibility checks, and a simpler update process. The second pain point is that the UI is outdated and complex. Jenkins' UI feels old compared to modern DevOps tools, making it not very user-friendly for beginners, and difficult to find settings. Job configuration is also confusing, and the dashboard looks outdated. Improvements are needed for a modern, cleaner interface, easier navigation, and better pipeline visualization. Additionally, scaling Jenkins is difficult in large companies running many pipelines, causing the Jenkins master to become slow with high CPU and memory usage, leading to build queue delays. Agent management becomes complex, and teams using cloud solutions such as AWS often require extra configuration for scaling. Improvements are necessary for better cloud-native scaling, auto-scaling agents, performance optimizations, and easier distributed setups.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user217035 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior iOS Developer at a media company with 5,001-10,000 employees
May 27, 2015
Bamboo vs. Jenkins
A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise9
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business28
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise57
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bamboo?
Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.
What needs improvement with Bamboo?
Regarding improvements for Bamboo, I can't think of anything right now. Bamboo is serving the purpose that we needed it for. I would say pipelines for model building could be an area of focus. Howe...
How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?
When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...
What do you like most about Jenkins?
Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?
Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire
Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
Find out what your peers are saying about Bamboo vs. Jenkins and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.
882,606 professionals have used our research since 2012.