Bamboo and GitLab are direct competitors in the CI/CD tools category. GitLab appears to have an edge due to its versatility and integration capabilities, attracting users with its comprehensive features for version control and CI/CD management.
Features: Bamboo offers seamless integration with Atlassian tools like Jira, providing a centralized workspace for build and deployment, supports multiple environments, and offers high customization for build pipelines. GitLab shines with its CI/CD pipeline management, comprehensive features for code review and branching, containerization, and integration with various repositories, making it attractive for users seeking robust version control.
Room for Improvement: Bamboo needs better third-party plugin support, a simplified upgrade process, enhanced Docker support, and integration with non-Atlassian tools. GitLab requires improved AWS integration, enhanced reporting capabilities, and more developed management and security features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bamboo supports on-premises and hybrid cloud environments, while GitLab offers flexible deployment across various cloud environments, making it adaptable to different infrastructure needs. Both products provide satisfactory customer support, though Bamboo's Atlassian support can involve more community-driven efforts.
Pricing and ROI: Bamboo's pricing is based on remote agents, which can be costly for smaller teams but offers value for larger setups. GitLab provides a mix of free and paid tiers, appealing to small teams due to its open-source nature, though transitioning to paid versions for advanced features can become expensive. GitLab offers competitive pricing with strong ROI for its comprehensive feature set.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
The UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.
GitLab is a great tool for developers, it lacks project planner features.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
The feature I appreciate the most about GitLab is its ease of use and compatibility, which allows for straightforward building and deployment processes.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
