Jenkins vs TeamCity comparison

Jenkins and JetBrains are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Jenkins is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1, while JetBrains is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.8. Jenkins holds a 10.4% mindshare in BA, compared to JetBrains’s 7.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Jenkins users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

Jenkins

Read 93 Jenkins reviews

4,156 Views
3,557 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

2,185 Views
1,937 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Jenkins

TeamCity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Jenkins and TeamCity are leading tools in the continuous integration and delivery category, competing to provide enhanced automation solutions. Jenkins has an advantage due to its free open-source model and strong community support, while TeamCity offers a more user-friendly interface and robust integration features.

Features: Jenkins is renowned for its extensive open-source community and a wide variety of plugins that provide flexibility. It is particularly favorable for its Pipeline plugin enabling complex automation. In contrast, TeamCity is praised for its ease in creating build pipelines, robust integration features, and effective visualization of builds.

Room for Improvement: Jenkins users frequently mention the need for a more modern user interface, better error feedback, and enhanced integration features. TeamCity users highlight the need for improved documentation, a better UI, and increased capabilities for version control system integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins offers flexible deployment options across on-premises, hybrid cloud, and public cloud setups, thanks to strong community support, though it lacks official support. TeamCity is similarly adaptable but faces challenges with on-premises deployment. Users recognize the value of its community and documentation in lieu of direct support.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins is cost-effective due to its free open-source version, which lowers operational expenses despite configuration costs. In contrast, TeamCity provides a free tier with limited capabilities, requiring a paid license for comprehensive features. Although considered expensive, its price is deemed justified due to its stability and support.

To learn more, read our detailed Jenkins vs. TeamCity Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins vs. TeamCity

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Jenkins is 10.4%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 7.7%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Dinesh-Patil

Consultant at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment

The dashboard needs to be improved. Though the access management and authentication functionalities are present, the dashboard and UI could be more user-friendly. The product has many plug-ins. Users have to go through the documentation to be able to use the product. The UI must be more user-friendly. The information should be available in the dashboard itself. The users shouldn’t have to refer to the documentation. When a user hovers over the elements on the dashboard, it should reveal information about them.

Read full review

Omakoji Idakwoji

Software Engineer at Home Depot

Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans

I find the TeamCity backend easily accessible. Users can login to the Linux servers that TeamCity is installed on and perform operations. Also I find the ability to template solutions using the meta runner a good feature as well as the user management feature. There is a display that shows which user made recent changes to a branch on GitHub, including the time the changes were made and the particular agent that ran the job. This is also a very useful feature. The metrics and audit available for projects, pipelines and jobs come in handy when debugging.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Having builds and test tasks triggered on commit helps not to break the product."

"It's very easy to learn."

"Jenkins' most valuable feature is Pipeline."

"Distributed execution of build and test jobs."

"When we have manual tasks, we have to depend on multiple technical teams. With Jenkins, we can bring all the technologies together by the click of a button. We can see results without having to depend on different teams. Jenkins makes life easy for the database and DevOps teams."

"We use Jenkins to automatically build Python binaries into several OS's i.e. OS X, Ubuntu, Windows 32-bit and Windows 64-bit."

"Very easy to understand for newcomers."

"I am not aware of the available options in the market right now compared to Jenkins, but I am pretty much happy with the service that Jenkins is providing our company."

More Jenkins pros

"It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling."

"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."

"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."

"TeamCity is more structured and user-friendly than other vendors."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."

"It is very easy to use, and its speed is impressive, allowing the code to be ready for production in seconds."

"The integration is a valuable feature."

"Time to deployment has been reduced in situations where we want to deploy to production or deploy breaking changes."

More TeamCity pros

Cons

"Jenkins is an open-source solution, and people tend to stay on the same version for a long time. When you look for an answer on Google, you often find something that doesn't relate to your implementation. The plugins are both the aspect of Jenkins and also one of the worst because the plugins can have different versions, so it's hard to figure out how to solve the problems."

"Developer documentation for plugins, plugin development, integrations: Sometimes it’s tricky to do pretty obvious things."

"UI is quite outdated."

"The user interface could be improved, and its reporting capabilities need enhancement. The plugins could be more effective."

"Some kind of SaaS product would be helpful in providing organizational structure."

"We need more licensed product integrations."

"Creating a new SonarQube project requires a separate job, and we've encountered some integration issues with Docker and the need for better vulnerability checks."

"Support should be provided at no cost, as there is no free support available for any of the free versions."

More Jenkins cons

"The integration between other solutions and TeamCity could be smoother."

"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."

"I need some more graphical design."

"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."

"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."

"The UI for this solution could be improved. New users don't find it easy to navigate. The need some level of training to understand the ins and the outs."

"I would like to see an improvement where TeamCity alerts us via email or another medium if there are discrepancies between the code in the staging environment and what has been deployed to production, such as missing updates."

"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."

More TeamCity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

"I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."

"We are using the free version of Jenkins. There is not a license required to use the solution because it is open-source."

"The tool is open-source."

"The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version."

"Jenkins is a free solution, it is open source."

"Jenkins is not expensive and reasonably priced."

"Jenkins is open-source, so it is free."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

What do you like most about TeamCity?

One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Nx vs Jenkins

Compared 5% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 36% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 17% of the time

Harness vs TeamCity

Compared 15% of the time

CircleCI vs TeamCity

Compared 9% of the time

JRebel vs TeamCity

Compared 3% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

April 2025

Download Jenkins product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

March 2025

Download TeamCity product report

Overview

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins vs. TeamCity

April 2025

Free Report: Jenkins vs. TeamCity

Find out what your peers are saying about Jenkins vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jenkins vs. TeamCity report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.