Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS CodePipeline vs TeamCity comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
AWS CodePipeline optimizes development efficiency and resources, enhancing monitoring with expected financial returns similar to AWS Batch.
Sentiment score
8.0
TeamCity enhances build efficiency and deployment across time zones, supporting automation for optimized resource allocation and ROI evaluation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
AWS CodePipeline support receives mixed reviews, with faster assistance in business plans; documentation helps some manage independently.
Sentiment score
7.6
TeamCity's customer service is praised for professionalism, responsive support, comprehensive documentation, and effective community resources despite time zone challenges.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
AWS CodePipeline is scalable and flexible, efficiently managing deployments across languages with high user satisfaction, despite Linux limitations.
Sentiment score
7.3
TeamCity enables scalable deployments with multiple agents, requiring regular maintenance, effectively supporting large-scale projects and numerous users.
AWS CodePipeline is good for scalability, and I rate it as nine out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
AWS CodePipeline is highly stable and reliable, with minimal issues if correctly configured, aligning well with CI/CD expectations.
Sentiment score
7.7
TeamCity offers high reliability and stability, with minimal disruptions and effective resource management, despite occasional minor lags.
I rate the stability of AWS CodePipeline as a ten out of ten because I have not experienced any issues with it.
 

Room For Improvement

AWS CodePipeline users want lower costs, faster builds, enhanced multi-cloud support, better integrations, UI, customization, and improved technical documentation.
TeamCity's complex setup, poor UI navigation, and integration issues hinder efficiency, with needs for API, reporting, and alert improvements.
The documentation for AWS CodePipeline is lacking and makes it difficult to find information due to its complexity.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users find AWS CodePipeline cost-effective and flexible, with monthly costs typically under $5 per pipeline.
TeamCity offers a developer-focused solution with scalable costs but requires an initial server setup expense despite a free version.
 

Valuable Features

AWS CodePipeline excels in integration, flexibility, cost-efficiency, security, and simplifies transitions with robust deployment and management tools.
TeamCity excels in build step flexibility, plugin support, cross-platform capabilities, Git integration, and intuitive usability for efficient pipeline management.
It allows me to test changes in an isolated environment before deploying them to the entire user base.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline
Ranking in Build Automation
4th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamCity
Ranking in Build Automation
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 5.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamCity is 7.7%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty - PeerSpot reviewer
A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture
Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.
Omakoji Idakwoji - PeerSpot reviewer
Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans
I find the TeamCity backend easily accessible. Users can login to the Linux servers that TeamCity is installed on and perform operations. Also I find the ability to template solutions using the meta runner a good feature as well as the user management feature. There is a display that shows which user made recent changes to a branch on GitHub, including the time the changes were made and the particular agent that ran the job. This is also a very useful feature. The metrics and audit available for projects, pipelines and jobs come in handy when debugging.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user184734 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 22, 2015
I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.
Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?
Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?
AWS CodePipeline and its associated services do not incur significant additional charges. The cost primarily comes from deploying other AWS resources like EC2 and S3 alongside the pipeline.
What do you like most about TeamCity?
One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?
Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.
What needs improvement with TeamCity?
TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

CodePipeline
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. TeamCity and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.