Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

TeamCity vs Tekton comparison

JetBrains and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. JetBrains is ranked #9 with an average rating of 6.8, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. JetBrains holds a 7.6% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of JetBrains users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.
TeamCity
Read 28 TeamCity reviews
  • 2,249 Views
  • 2,013 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Tekton
Read 36 Tekton reviews
  • 5,137 Views
  • 3,266 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

In the CI/CD category, TeamCity and Tekton are popular options. TeamCity has the upper hand with its comprehensive features bolstered by a plugin system, although Tekton's strength lies in its Kubernetes-native scalability.

Features: TeamCity offers extensive customization in build step creation, a strong plugin system, and integration capabilities with platform independence. Tekton excels with cloud-native scalability, seamless Kubernetes integration, and flexible pipeline structuring, making it versatile for complex jobs.

Room for Improvement: TeamCity could improve in simplifying build configuration processes and enhancing reporting and integrations. Tekton needs better documentation and ease of use, particularly for developers unfamiliar with Kubernetes, while improving YAML file management and scalability features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamCity offers reliable support and thorough documentation, serving on-premises and cloud environments. Tekton provides flexibility in hybrid cloud deployment, supported strongly through community forums, though its documentation could be more comprehensive.

Pricing and ROI: TeamCity's freemium model begins with affordable licensing for enterprise use, making it scalable up to 10 build agents. Tekton remains free and open-source, offering significant cost savings and efficiency compared to other tools, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed TeamCity vs. Tekton Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
TeamCity vs. Tekton
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.0
TeamCity enhances build efficiency and deployment across time zones, supporting automation for optimized resource allocation and ROI evaluation.
Sentiment score
7.9
Tekton enhances efficiency and cuts costs by optimizing Kubernetes deployment, though resource duplication may increase expenses.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
TeamCity's customer service is praised for professionalism, responsive support, comprehensive documentation, and effective community resources despite time zone challenges.
Sentiment score
6.8
Red Hat's Tekton support is praised for integration and resources, despite slow technical responses, with community forums aiding users.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
TeamCity enables scalable deployments with multiple agents, requiring regular maintenance, effectively supporting large-scale projects and numerous users.
Sentiment score
7.0
Tekton scales effectively with Kubernetes, handling multiple pipelines and reducing costs but requires customization for optimal resource management.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
TeamCity offers high reliability and stability, with minimal disruptions and effective resource management, despite occasional minor lags.
Sentiment score
7.2
Tekton is stable and efficient on Kubernetes, with minor configuration issues, excelling in autoscaling and resource management.
 

Room For Improvement

TeamCity's complex setup, poor UI navigation, and integration issues hinder efficiency, with needs for API, reporting, and alert improvements.
Tekton needs better integration, improved UI, documentation, scalability, and security, with easier YAML configuration and enhanced debugging support.
 

Setup Cost

TeamCity offers a developer-focused solution with scalable costs but requires an initial server setup expense despite a free version.
Tekton is a cost-effective open-source tool reducing expenses compared to licensed alternatives, despite potential cloud-related costs.
 

Valuable Features

TeamCity excels in build step flexibility, plugin support, cross-platform capabilities, Git integration, and intuitive usability for efficient pipeline management.
Tekton enhances CI/CD efficiency with Kubernetes integration, customizable pipelines, and seamless automation, ideal for Kubernetes-centric teams.
 

Categories and Ranking

TeamCity
Ranking in Build Automation
9th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tekton
Ranking in Build Automation
2nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
36
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of TeamCity is 7.6%, up from 6.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.1%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Build Automation
 

Featured Reviews

Omakoji Idakwoji - PeerSpot reviewer
Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans
I find the TeamCity backend easily accessible. Users can login to the Linux servers that TeamCity is installed on and perform operations. Also I find the ability to template solutions using the meta runner a good feature as well as the user management feature. There is a display that shows which user made recent changes to a branch on GitHub, including the time the changes were made and the particular agent that ran the job. This is also a very useful feature. The metrics and audit available for projects, pipelines and jobs come in handy when debugging.
Read full review
AjayKrishna - PeerSpot reviewer
If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution
Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user184734 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 22, 2015
I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.
Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…
Read full review
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
17%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
23%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TeamCity?
One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?
Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TeamCity?
TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...
See all answers
How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?
When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...
See all answers
What do you like most about Tekton?
Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Tekton?
Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

GitLab vs TeamCity Logo
GitLab vs TeamCity
Compared 38% of the time
GitHub Actions vs TeamCity Logo
GitHub Actions vs TeamCity
Compared 18% of the time
Harness vs TeamCity Logo
Harness vs TeamCity
Compared 14% of the time
CircleCI vs TeamCity Logo
CircleCI vs TeamCity
Compared 10% of the time
Jenkins vs TeamCity Logo
Jenkins vs TeamCity
Compared 8% of the time
More TeamCity Competitors
GitHub Actions vs Tekton Logo
GitHub Actions vs Tekton
Compared 34% of the time
GitLab vs Tekton Logo
GitLab vs Tekton
Compared 25% of the time
Harness vs Tekton Logo
Harness vs Tekton
Compared 8% of the time
Jenkins vs Tekton Logo
Jenkins vs Tekton
Compared 6% of the time
Travis CI vs Tekton Logo
Travis CI vs Tekton
Compared 3% of the time
More Tekton Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
TeamCity
March 2025
TeamCity reportDownload TeamCity product report
Buyer's Guide
Tekton
March 2025
Tekton reportDownload Tekton product report
 

Overview

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

JetBrains

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google
 

Sample Customers

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia
The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture
Buyer's Guide
TeamCity vs. Tekton
March 2025
Free Report: TeamCity vs. Tekton
Find out what your peers are saying about TeamCity vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our TeamCity vs. Tekton report.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.