TeamCity vs Tekton comparison

JetBrains and Google are both solutions in the Build Automation category. JetBrains is ranked #10 with an average rating of 6.8, while Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.7. JetBrains holds a 7.3% mindshare in BA, compared to Google’s 12.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of JetBrains users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Google users who would recommend it.

TeamCity

Read 28 TeamCity reviews

2,410 Views
2,178 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Tekton

Read 36 Tekton reviews

5,774 Views
3,462 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

TeamCity

Tekton

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between TeamCity and Tekton based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed TeamCity vs. Tekton Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity vs. Tekton

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

TeamCity

Ranking in Build Automation

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of TeamCity is 7.3%, up from 6.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tekton is 12.1%, up from 10.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Omakoji Idakwoji

Software Engineer at Home Depot

Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans

I find the TeamCity backend easily accessible. Users can login to the Linux servers that TeamCity is installed on and perform operations. Also I find the ability to template solutions using the meta runner a good feature as well as the user management feature. There is a display that shows which user made recent changes to a branch on GitHub, including the time the changes were made and the particular agent that ran the job. This is also a very useful feature. The metrics and audit available for projects, pipelines and jobs come in handy when debugging.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"TeamCity's GUI is nice."

"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."

"Good integration with IDE and JetBrains products."

"The integration is a valuable feature."

"It is very easy to use, and its speed is impressive, allowing the code to be ready for production in seconds."

"The flexibility of TeamCity allows it to fit in workflows that I have yet to imagine."

"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."

"TeamCity is more structured and user-friendly than other vendors."

More TeamCity pros

"We just have some configuration files, and it will handle the deployments smoother and faster compared to CI/CD 2.0."

"I like the branching and visualization tools for the pipeline."

"Tekton is an orchestrator. It provides seamless integration for our pipelines. It offers robust support for executing tasks within the pipeline, allowing us to set up and run pipelines quickly."

"The tool's most valuable aspect is its compatibility with the cloud-native environment. It can be easily installed on Kubernetes and leverages its resources to run CI/CD pipelines."

"The installation process is seamless, requiring fewer resources compared to Jenkins."

"Tekton provides a feature where you can schedule the job."

"The feature that I like most about Tekton is that it is built for Kubernetes, so we can utilize our resources effectively."

"Tekton has a user interface that facilitates time savings, making it more user-friendly than Jenkins."

More Tekton pros

Cons

"If there was more documentation that was easier to locate, it would be helpful for users."

"I would suggest creating simple and advanced configurations. Advanced configurations will give more customizations like Jenkins does."

"Last time I used it, dotnet compilation had to be done via PowerShell scripts. There was actually a lot that had to be scripted."

"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."

"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."

"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."

"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."

"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."

More TeamCity cons

"Tekton should have more accessibility for some rare use cases so that we can have more references when applying some techniques to our pipeline."

"Compared to traditional tools like Jenkins, Tekton lacks a lot of features. It's not efficient in managing conflicts between multiple pipelines."

"The product's scalability can be challenging when multiple users access it simultaneously."

"One area where Tekton can improve is log management."

"Tekton is a good product with all the features I need. There isn't anything that needs improvement."

"Tekton lacks sufficient documentation"

"Initially, working with YAML configuration can be challenging using the solution."

"The product's version update management process needs improvement."

More Tekton cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is on an annual basis."

"Start with the free tier for a few build configs and see how it works for you, then according to your scale find the enterprise license which fits you the most."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"The product is free of cost."

"The product is free and open-source."

"The solution is open-source."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about TeamCity?

One of the most beneficial features for us is the flexibility it offers in creating deployment steps tailored to different technologies.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamCity?

Compared to new technologies, TeamCity is more expensive and is an older tool compared to tools like GitLab.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamCity?

TeamCity's user interface could be improved; specifically, the tree structure on the homepage is not clear, making it difficult to search for projects. Moreover, there are some limitations related ...

See all answers

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs TeamCity

Compared 40% of the time

GitHub Actions vs TeamCity

Compared 17% of the time

Harness vs TeamCity

Compared 12% of the time

CircleCI vs TeamCity

Compared 11% of the time

Jenkins vs TeamCity

Compared 8% of the time

More TeamCity Competitors

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 34% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 27% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

Travis CI vs Tekton

Compared 3% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity

December 2024

Download TeamCity product report

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

December 2024

Download Tekton product report

Learn More

JetBrains

Google

Overview

TeamCity is a Continuous Integration and Deployment server that provides out-of-the-box continuous unit testing, code quality analysis, and early reporting on build problems. A simple installation process lets you deploy TeamCity and start improving your release management practices in a matter of minutes. TeamCity supports Java, .NET and Ruby development and integrates perfectly with major IDEs, version control systems, and issue tracking systems.

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Sample Customers

Toyota, Xerox, Apple, MIT, Volkswagen, HP, Twitter, Expedia

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Buyer's Guide

TeamCity vs. Tekton

January 2025

Free Report: TeamCity vs. Tekton

Find out what your peers are saying about TeamCity vs. Tekton and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our TeamCity vs. Tekton report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.