Tekton vs Travis CI comparison

Google and Travis CI are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Google is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8, while Travis CI is ranked #21 with an average rating of 6.0. Google holds a 12.1% mindshare in BA, compared to Travis CI’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of Google users are willing to recommend the solution.

Tekton

Read 36 Tekton reviews

5,137 Views
3,266 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Travis CI

Read 2 Travis CI reviews

406 Views
422 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Tekton

Travis CI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 5, 2025

Travis CI and Tekton compete in the continuous integration and delivery category. Tekton appears to have an edge due to its cloud-native architecture, making it highly suitable for Kubernetes environments.

Features: Travis CI provides simplicity and robust language support, benefiting from seamless GitHub integration and easy YAML-based configuration. Tekton offers flexibility in custom pipeline creation and Kubernetes-native operations, making it ideal for cloud-native development.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Travis CI is straightforward to deploy, providing a traditional experience with extensive online support resources. Tekton requires Kubernetes knowledge for deployment but aligns well with cloud-native practices, supported by comprehensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Travis CI has straightforward pricing plans catering to different needs, appealing for simple CI/CD requirements. Tekton is open-source, eliminating license costs and offering scalability, leading to long-term ROI for cloud-native efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,690 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Tekton

Ranking in Build Automation

2nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Travis CI

Ranking in Build Automation

21st

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Tekton is 12.1%, up from 10.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Travis CI is 0.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

If you're dealing with many applications and need a reliable, scalable, and efficient system, I'd recommend this solution

Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments. Another important aspect is the level of customization offered by Tekton. Each task in the CI pipeline can be customized independently, allowing developers to write code in various languages like shell scripting, Java, or Python and incorporate them into the pipeline as needed. This level of abstraction and customization greatly benefits developers in creating efficient CI pipelines. Also, it can be challenging to understand the logs and troubleshoot issues without clear guidance. It's not always easy to reach technical support and get immediate answers. In my opinion, improvement in this area would be beneficial.

Read full review

Pravar Agrawal

Senior SRE at IBM

YAML-based configuration and simple deployment but user interface needs modernizing

Travis CI is an okay tool, and I am forced to use it as part of my job. I don't maintain it; it is running somewhere else, and I don't have control over it. The interface is very basic and not user-friendly; it feels like it was stuck in 2010. It is very basic and designed for lightweight CI work, and it cannot handle heavy CI. You cannot do branched flows, and you will have to write shell scripts to send calls here and there. The pipelines are not as detailed as some other CI/CD tools. If Travis is down, you don't have any control over it and need to reach out to their customer support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Tekton is a stable product."

"We just have some configuration files, and it will handle the deployments smoother and faster compared to CI/CD 2.0."

"Tekton's inclusion in Kubernetes deployment offers better visibility on how Tekton is performing within a cluster. It is lightweight and not as heavy as Jenkins to maintain."

"I would say the customization ability that Tekton provides is good."

"Tekton's most important feature is its cloud-native nature. Unlike Jenkins, which may not scale as efficiently, Tekton's CI pipeline can automatically scale up to handle increased workload demands without needing manual adjustments."

"We can make a lot of customizations, and data sharing between tasks using workspaces is very convenient."

"The installation process is seamless, requiring fewer resources compared to Jenkins."

"Tekton is an orchestrator. It provides seamless integration for our pipelines. It offers robust support for executing tasks within the pipeline, allowing us to set up and run pipelines quickly."

More Tekton pros

"The only thing I like about Travis CI is that you have a YAML file to define a Travis flow."

Cons

"There might be occasional issues with storage or cluster-level logging, which can affect production."

"Incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future."

"Tekton should have more accessibility for some rare use cases so that we can have more references when applying some techniques to our pipeline."

"Tekton lacks sufficient documentation"

"While Tekton is highly effective for Kubernetes-based setups, it might not suit users who require more control over bare-metal environments."

"Improvement is needed in the build step."

"The tool should improve in terms of output flexibility. It runs on a specific Kubernetes machine, and the persistent memory storage is on a single partition. Improving this aspect could make analyzing logs and toolchain outputs from external tools easier."

"The user interface of Tekton could be improved."

More Tekton cons

"The interface is very basic and not user-friendly; it feels like it was stuck in 2010."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source."

"The tool is open-source and free to use."

"Tekton is an open-source tool."

"The product is free of cost."

"It is entirely open source and free of charge."

"The product is free and open-source."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tekton?

Its seamless integration with Kubernetes, being built on top of it and utilizing Custom Resource Definitions, ensures a smooth experience within Kubernetes environments exclusively.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tekton?

Regarding areas for improvement in Tekton, I have not encountered significant issues. It works well for our use case. However, incorporating AI could be a potential enhancement in the future.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Travis CI?

I'm not too sure about the pricing of Travis or how the agreement works.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Travis CI?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Travis CI?

Travis CI is mainly used to run integration tests as part of the deployment, which I do on Kubernetes. The Travis workflows are integrated with any changes in my code. It will have different jobs, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

GitHub Actions vs Tekton

Compared 33% of the time

GitLab vs Tekton

Compared 25% of the time

Harness vs Tekton

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs Tekton

Compared 6% of the time

AWS CodePipeline vs Tekton

Compared 1% of the time

More Tekton Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Tekton

March 2025

Download Tekton product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

March 2025

Download Travis CI product report

Overview

Tekton is a powerful yet flexible Kubernetes-native open-source framework for creating continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) systems. It lets you build, test, and deploy across multiple cloud providers or on-premises systems by abstracting away the underlying implementation details.

Google

Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes. Travis CI for private repositories has plans for every size project. With Travis CI testing your open source project is 100% free.

Travis CI

Sample Customers

The Home Depot, PayPal, Target, HSBC, McKesson, Oncology Venture

Facebook, Heroku, Mozilla, Zendesk, twitter, Rails

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, Jenkins and others in Build Automation. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.