AWS CodePipeline vs CircleCI comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and CircleCI are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while CircleCI is ranked #13 with an average rating of 4.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 7.1% mindshare in BA, compared to CircleCI’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of CircleCI users who would recommend it.

AWS CodePipeline

Read 21 AWS CodePipeline reviews

3,660 Views
2,877 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CircleCI

Read 5 CircleCI reviews

1,459 Views
1,350 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS CodePipeline

CircleCI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS CodePipeline and CircleCI based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Build Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodePipeline

Ranking in Build Automation

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CircleCI

Ranking in Build Automation

13th

Average Rating

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of AWS CodePipeline is 7.1%, down from 9.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CircleCI is 3.6%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Udhay Prakash Pethakamsetty

Data Engineer Manager at Capgemini

A fully managed service with excellent integrations and a flexible architecture

Compared to any other tools, AWS products provide better integrations. We have tools for all our needs. The integrations are good. The product is a fully managed service. We specify the various stages in the CI/CD process. We can do it without any external tools. Going through everything is usually an overhead for developers. It is like a configuration. We need to configure it only once. The integration with other AWS services has helped us. Our life as a developer is easy. We need not focus on the integration manually. If we work with third-party tools, we must consider connectivity, role management, security, authentication, and authorization. In AWS CodePipeline, if we have IAM roles configured and KMS for the credentials, we need not worry about anything else. Everything can be done within the tool. The integrations are the best part. We can track everything. The connectivity and scalability are good. The architecture is also flexible enough. We can add multiple things.

Read full review

reviewer0972521

Chief Technology Officer at Kyberlife

Unhelpful support, unclear billing, and has offers ability to track usage

We've had occasional connectivity issues with cloud resources and build failure due to its own internal system setup and environment. That costs us credits. Support engineers do not thoroughly read and understand issues when emailing them. They reply to me with a totally different context about the problem. Just yesterday, my web applications failed to 'yarn build' after I downgraded the resource class from extr-large to large. I contacted support and got no reply. Billing is a mess. There is duplicate information in the bill downloaded from their website and when I asked for a consolidated bill, they just answered that they didn't have it. There is no transparency on how many billed minutes and credits I spent each day both on their website and the monthly bill which makes it difficult to understand when the monthly bill contains many refill item charges. It is difficult or impossible to track usage and burndown of my subscription and to gain total outstanding refill amounts on a daily basis. Their website doesn't provide sufficient information on credits allocated/calculated for my extra-large resource class.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best thing about AWS CodePipeline is that we don't have to manage agents."

"The notification and approval approach in the production environment are very useful."

"It's a perfect solution if you are just using AWS."

"The product is a one-stop solution that you can use to integrate, deploy and host your application."

"CodePipeline allows integration with any source code and facilitates deployment to EC2 or ECS, which is highly valuable."

"I prefer using CodePipeline and CodeBuild in AWS due to their integration with AWS services, like directly deploying to ECS using Cloud Deploy."

"I find performance to be the most valuable CodePipeline feature. It works perfectly and smoothly."

"The solution's technical support responds whenever you have an issue, especially whenever you need something sorted out from their side."

More AWS CodePipeline pros

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

"It's a stable product."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."

"The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery."

"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

Cons

"The solution could improve the documentation. Sometimes we have some issues with the documentation not updating after releasing .NET 6. We had some issues with building the code pipeline, and it was not updating the documentation. It's better to update the code documentation."

"Improved enhancements and features could make it more intuitive."

"The setup time is a bit long."

"There could be a possibility of deploying tag-based conditions for different environments using the same code base."

"I would appreciate if we don't have to install any agents, even for EC2, to deploy using CodeDeploy into EC2 servers. It would help if AWS allows application deployment without requiring the Fortify agent installation."

"The migration process from one source code to another needs improvement."

"The support team’s response time must be improved."

"AWS CodePipeline doesn't offer much room for customization."

More AWS CodePipeline cons

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Billing is a mess."

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the product depends on how many times you run it. The tool offers a pay-as-you-go model."

"I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten."

"AWS CodePipeline is quite affordable. I've been running around four pipelines and the cost is around one dollar per month. It rarely exceeds two dollars."

"The pricing is manageable."

"The pricing of this solution is dependent upon your needs including how many jobs you daily and how many times the developer will be changing codes and completing deployments."

"Compared to other cloud services, AWS CodePipeline falls a bit more on the pricey side. I see that the price of the product has been increasing for the past few years."

"It is a straightforward approach where you pay for the resources you consume as they offer a subscription-based licensing model."

"The product is quite expensive compared to other solutions."

More AWS CodePipeline pricing and cost advice

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which AWS solution would you choose - CodeStar or CodePipeline?

Both AWS solutions deliver solid options, with uniquely different features. AWS CodeStar allows for quick development, building, and deployments of apps. It also provides web application and web se...

See all answers

What do you like most about AWS CodePipeline?

Code deployment is the best feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodePipeline?

I would rate the pricing for CodePipeline at a five out of ten. It depends on other services being used in conjunction with it. The pricing is a bundle.

See all answers

What do you like most about CircleCI?

The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

Beware of skyrocketing bills as CircleCI does not provide transparency into how they charge refills. Their monthly billing statement is almost unreadable and their online dashboard doesn't provide ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 57% of the time

Jenkins vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 15% of the time

GitHub Actions vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 11% of the time

AWS CodeStar vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 8% of the time

Tekton vs AWS CodePipeline

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS CodePipeline Competitors

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 28% of the time

Tekton vs CircleCI

Compared 25% of the time

GitHub Actions vs CircleCI

Compared 12% of the time

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 8% of the time

Jenkins vs CircleCI

Compared 8% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline

November 2024

Download AWS CodePipeline product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

November 2024

Download CircleCI product report

Also Known As

CodePipeline

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

CircleCI

Overview

AWS CodePipeline is a fully managed continuous delivery service that helps you automate your release pipelines for fast and reliable application and infrastructure updates. CodePipeline automates the build, test, and deploy phases of your release process every time there is a code change, based on the release model you define. This enables you to rapidly and reliably deliver features and updates. You can easily integrate AWS CodePipeline with third-party services such as GitHub or with your own custom plugin. With AWS CodePipeline, you only pay for what you use. There are no upfront fees or long-term commitments.

CircleCI is a leading platform for automating continuous integration and deployment (CI/CD), valued for its capability to manage software updates efficiently. With an easy-to-configure system using YAML files and robust Docker support, CircleCI streamlines backend updates, frontend developments, and mobile app testing across devices. Its parallelism feature and insightful dashboard reduce processing times and improve workflow visibility, respectively, enhancing team collaboration and productivity while maintaining high-quality outputs across development stages.

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI

October 2024

Free Report: AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodePipeline vs. CircleCI report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.