CircleCI vs GitHub Actions comparison

CircleCI and GitHub are both solutions in the Build Automation category. CircleCI is ranked #13 with an average rating of 6.7, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.5. CircleCI holds a 3.5% mindshare in BA, compared to GitHub’s 8.1% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of CircleCI users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

CircleCI

Read 9 CircleCI reviews

1,158 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

GitHub Actions

Read 23 GitHub Actions reviews

3,083 Views
3,083 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CircleCI

GitHub Actions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 11, 2025

CircleCI and GitHub Actions are prominent tools in the continuous integration and deployment space. GitHub Actions holds the advantage with seamless integration into GitHub projects and a comprehensive feature set, whereas CircleCI is notable for competitive pricing and strong customer support.

Features: CircleCI offers versatile workflows, extensive third-party integrations, and advanced caching capabilities. GitHub Actions provides a fully integrated environment, diverse workflow triggers, and strong automation within GitHub.

Room for Improvement: CircleCI could enhance its native integration with GitHub projects, streamline its initial setup process, and expand its automation features. GitHub Actions might improve on detailed documentation for complex workflows, optimize its user interface for non-GitHub environments, and expand support for AI-based projects.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub Actions, with its native integration, simplifies setup for developers using the GitHub ecosystem, while CircleCI offers comprehensive customer support and requires more initial configuration.

Pricing and ROI: CircleCI provides a straightforward pricing model focusing on scalability, beneficial for organizations needing extensive support. GitHub Actions, often seen as cost-effective for GitHub users, still incurs costs with high usage but offers considerable value through its automation and integration features.

To learn more, read our detailed CircleCI vs. GitHub Actions Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI vs. GitHub Actions

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,479 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CircleCI

Ranking in Build Automation

13th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI Software Development (203rd)

GitHub Actions

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of CircleCI is 3.5%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub Actions is 8.1%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
GitHub Actions	8.1%
CircleCI	3.5%
Other	88.4%

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Manas Kashyap

DevOps Engineer at Elevenxcapital

Automated parallel pipelines have accelerated deployments but complex configs still need simplification

CircleCI can be improved by making it less costly, as it is very expensive. The config complexity, like the YAML config, can become messy in complex projects. Making it simpler, much like having a Docker Compose YAML or Kubernetes YAML, is necessary from that perspective. Rather than keeping it a SaaS project, they can think of it through a Jenkins approach, where we can also self-host it into our environment, but it is acceptable. It is very expensive, and many organizations cannot afford it. The config complexity, like the YAML configs, can become messy in complex projects. A better DevOps person can only handle it, not a normal person. For that reason, I chose a rating of seven. It is quite expensive, to be honest. As mentioned, many organizations cannot afford it because of the parallel execution prices as well as the config complexity.

Read full review

Bharadwaj Deepak Mohapatra

DevOps Engineer at ENTERPRISE SYSTEM SOLUTIONS LIMITED

Has supported repository management and demonstrates potential in workflow flexibility

While GitHub Actions offers a range of functionalities, it is newer compared to more established tools such as Jenkins and Azure DevOps. There is still room for improvement, especially in areas concerning deeper capabilities akin to those provided by Jenkins and Azure DevOps. Given the evolving nature of technology, there are potential improvements GitHub Actions can focus on, including enhancing support and reliability to match its competitors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a stable product."

"CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to build quicker and do things quicker."

"CircleCI has positively impacted my organization by bringing in faster deployments, which means we can release faster, receive quicker feedback, and enhance collaboration and communication across the entire team."

"The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

"CircleCI has positively impacted the organization, as it has been used for many years and serves as the main source for application deployment."

"Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts."

"The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc."

"Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate."

More CircleCI pros

"It offers numerous built-in features for pipeline management, release management, and even work item tracking on boards, which makes it a versatile tool that seamlessly integrates with hardware and facilitates optimization."

"It improves efficiency as it involves no downtime and is managed by GitHub."

"The solution has saved us approximately 20% in terms of efficiency and productivity."

"It is user-friendly, with clear and organized processes, making it easy to navigate and work with."

"I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to just 8 to 10 minutes through these optimizations."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is a good product that offers stability and performance."

"GitHub Actions can be easily configured, especially for environment variables and secrets. The UI is understandable and user-friendly for setting up CI/CD pipelines. I prefer tools like GitLab, where the pipeline starts quickly and is accessible near the commits for easy access. However, many CI/CD tools are interchangeable due to similar features of GitHub Actions and other similar tools."

"The product's most beneficial feature is the ability to create workflows within the solution."

More GitHub Actions pros

Cons

"A return on investment with CircleCI has not been observed, and no relevant metrics such as time saved or fewer employees needed can be shared."

"I rated CircleCI six out of ten because I think they need more transparency in pricing, as there are instances of unclear network data transfer and storage costs related to caching and workspaces."

"There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing."

"CircleCI can be improved by making it less costly, as it is very expensive."

"The solution’s pricing could be better."

"Billing is a mess."

"Improvements could be made in terms of time-saving capabilities and resolving potential complexities in centralized workflows."

"The main challenge I've experienced is with integration, particularly uploading to OneDrive, which was more complex compared to Google Drive or AWS S3 bucket."

"The minor drawback of GitHub Actions is the management of the dashboard and pipeline runs, which needs improvement. The dashboard for running pipelines could be better."

"The primary area for improvement I see is in artifact management, especially for saving screenshots or videos from failed tests or data-driven actions. Currently, the configuration for saving these artifacts is complex."

"We still use Jenkins for some tasks, which suggests there may be areas for improvement in GitHub Actions."

"While GitHub Actions offers a range of functionalities, it is newer compared to more established tools such as Jenkins and Azure DevOps. There is still room for improvement, especially in areas concerning deeper capabilities akin to those provided by Jenkins and Azure DevOps."

"Switching between hosted and self-hosted agents can be a bit complex, as self-hosted agents need to be provisioned in platforms like Azure or AWS."

"We can leverage this database tool to manage everything within our environment and data burners, allowing for customization and execution. An additional advantage is the capability to modify aspects like file size, making processes more efficient and faster across the pipelines. Regarding improvements or implementations, I believe there should be enhancements made to the deployment tool. It should be integrated as part of the solution. Infrastructure-wise, we already have tools like GitHub and RobSpot, and data enables us to automate various processes, which is quite beneficial. As for further enhancements, I'm uncertain. I've shared everything I know. However, if there's something specific you'd like to see in future releases, a feature that may not exist yet but would be desirable, I can't provide any input on that matter."

More GitHub Actions cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."

"It's low-priced. Not high, but definitely low."

"Price-wise, GitHub Actions is okay. If I want to use the product's advanced features, then I need to pay the licensing charges for the solution."

"For our basic usage, we didn't have to pay."

"The product is slightly more expensive than some alternatives."

"The tool's price is okay and reasonable."

"It is free and open platform, so I would rate it 1 out of 10."

"The cost for GitHub Actions may be around $45 dollars per user."

"Regarding cost, as an enterprise, we negotiate our license and expenses, so I can't provide a specific rating for that."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

University

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CircleCI?

There is not much experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing because that is managed by the legal team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CircleCI?

I think CircleCI can improve in terms of pricing and needs to bring more unique selling points to stay competitive as there are many other cloud solutions such as GitHub Actions and Azure DevOps th...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering CircleCI?

I really appreciate the good speed, which is faster and definitely the most important feature for me.To ensure that security and compliance requirements are met while using CircleCI, we utilize res...

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub Actions?

I have optimized job execution time by running test scripts in parallel and creating multiple pipelines; we've significantly reduced execution times. What could take 50 minutes can be cut down to j...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub Actions?

I would rate pricing a seven, which leans toward the expensive side. However, there is still value for money, and that's why we continue using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub Actions?

See all answers

Comparisons

Tekton vs CircleCI

Compared 10% of the time

GitLab vs CircleCI

Compared 9% of the time

TeamCity vs CircleCI

Compared 8% of the time

Buildkite vs CircleCI

Compared 7% of the time

Jenkins vs CircleCI

Compared 7% of the time

More CircleCI Competitors

Tekton vs GitHub Actions

Compared 19% of the time

Harness vs GitHub Actions

Compared 13% of the time

TeamCity vs GitHub Actions

Compared 8% of the time

Buildkite vs GitHub Actions

Compared 8% of the time

JFrog Pipeline vs GitHub Actions

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Actions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI

February 2026

Download CircleCI product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub Actions

February 2026

Download GitHub Actions product report

Overview

CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that automates software development, streamlining the process for engineers and developers. It's valued for its ability to enhance development speed while maintaining high software quality.

Known for its robust CI/CD capabilities, CircleCI supports a wide range of programming languages and integrations, allowing teams to build and deploy code with efficiency and reliability. Its flexibility and automation features help teams quickly adapt to changing project requirements. CircleCI's cloud-based architecture ensures scalability and accessibility, making it an attractive option for modern development environments.

What are CircleCI's key features?

Continuous Integration: Automates code integration with testing to catch errors early.
Continuous Deployment: Simplifies the process of deploying code to production environments.
Customizable Workflows: Offers flexibility in defining build, test, and deployment stages.
Parallel Execution: Speeds up builds by running multiple tasks at once.
VCS Integration: Seamlessly integrates with platforms like GitHub and Bitbucket.

What benefits can users expect when using CircleCI?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines development workflows, reducing the time to market.
Improved Code Quality: Early error detection through automation increases overall quality.
Scalability: Ability to handle growing workloads as development needs evolve.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork through shared visibility and control over development processes.

In tech-driven industries, CircleCI enables efficient software development pipelines. Its ability to run automated tests and manage deployments effectively is particularly beneficial in fast-paced, innovation-driven fields like fintech, mobile app development, and SaaS platforms. Offering tools that meet high-demand environments, it supports teams in delivering timely and quality software products.

CircleCI

GitHub Actions streamlines CI/CD processes with an intuitive YAML workflow and robust automation, enhancing efficiency and integration with third-party tools and cloud providers.

GitHub Actions automates development pipelines, supports scalable public and private runners, and manages secure secrets. This tool integrates seamlessly with platforms like AWS, Kubernetes, Google Cloud, and Databricks. It enhances DevOps workflows with reliable task automation. Users note areas for UI and deployment tool improvements, artifact management simplification, and additional programming language support. Debugging complexity and hosting agent transitions pose challenges, along with integration enhancements for tools like OneDrive.

What are GitHub Actions' key features?

YAML Workflow Creation: Simplifies configuration with intuitive YAML.
CI/CD Integration: Provides seamless integration within DevOps pipelines.
Automation Capabilities: Automates tasks with minimal manual intervention.
Third-Party Tool Compatibility: Works well with diverse tools and platforms.
Secure Secrets Management: Protects sensitive information effectively.

What benefits do users find in GitHub Actions?

Enhanced Performance: Boosts task execution speed and reliability.
Scalability: Supports growth with flexible runner options.
Improved Release Cycles: Ensures consistent updates and deployments.
Workflow Efficiency: Reduces manual tasks, increasing operational efficiency.

Companies in tech and software development frequently utilize GitHub Actions for integrating, deploying, and versioning projects. It is often employed for deploying applications to cloud environments like AWS and Kubernetes, managing extensive CI/CD workflows, and automating test and security operations, thereby streamlining production cycles across industries.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CircleCI vs. GitHub Actions

February 2026

Free Report: CircleCI vs. GitHub Actions

Find out what your peers are saying about CircleCI vs. GitHub Actions and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CircleCI vs. GitHub Actions report.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.