HPE Proliant ML Reviews

The quality of the build is the “be-all and end-all” in my eyes. I like the fact that it's indestructible. We've had servers for a long time. Most companies have servers that last for only three years and then they replace them. We've had servers for seven or eight years. The only reason we get rid of them is because the newer models are out. There is nothing wrong with them.

I'm old school. When I look at servers, it has to have an HPE brand. I don't like Fujitsu. I've used them and I don't like them. I don't particularly like Dell.

HPE works out of the box. There's no poshness or no stupid laws and regulations. You just choose what you want and it just works.

It's compatible with servers and other HP equipment we use in the schools. I don't have any issues with compatibility. If I need drivers for specific products, they are there online. I don't have to run around all over the place looking for equivalent drivers or equivalent bits of software. In my job in education, I have found that HPE has support for all technology. It's a one-stop-shop.

I would like to be able to interact with touchscreen smart boards. It comes with iPads and Apple devices. I'd like to interact wirelessly with smart boards. I found Apple a little bit better for that. That's why schools are buying a lot of iPads at the moment. I buy HPE laptops for the teachers and stuff like that, but to make it interactive, it has to be physically plugged into devices to get it to work. Once they're connected, it works great. Schools are going on iPads now where they can connect wirelessly.

I've been doing this for 20 years and I've only had one HPE server die during that time. The motherboard failed. I just rang HPE and an HPE engineer came out and fixed it within 24 hours. I can't find a fault with this product at all.

You can scale it. We don't scale it as such. We buy a product to suit our needs, and we've never needed to enhance it after we bought it out of the box. What we normally do is look at the specifications, see what that job entails, and build a server to those specifications. We look at a two or a three-year growth expectancy. That's one of the jobs I basically do.

I've used HPE technical support, and it is phenomenal. I had one issue once where I couldn't get the installation to start. It was a starting pack, which HPE has since built into your machines. Back then, it was a new product, Version 2, that I had never used. I just rang up and said, "How do you get this to kick in? Where's the CD? Where's this, where's that?" It worked really well. The fault was just in my knowledge. I didn't have that sort of range.

With the new version, you just press a key and it kicks in.

The setup is for single-layer network. We have servers on the main cover, and then it satellites out to individual premises in schools that go over the fiber link, and the group policies then travel from the main cover down to the satellite sites.

This solution has average security, but only for education purposes. We have standard encryption.

We inquire about the newest product that is coming out, and then we look at the cost-efficiency for how much it's capable of doing for what we need. If it's too big of a jump, then we will opt-out of that option, and look for an everyday solution. We're talking about primary and secondary skills. We haven't got thousands and thousands of pounds to pay for them.

I've used HPE in the past. I know it works out of the box. I won't change since it works. If you want cheap, then you get cheap. If you want good quality that lasts you forever, then you buy HPE. You pay for what you have.

Keep up the good work.

The most valuable feature of HPE Proliant ML is the high availability of the parts. It's easy to find parts, such as replacements or spares. Additionally, we have a good relationship with the brand which is important.

I have been using HPE Proliant ML for approximately eight years.

HPE Proliant ML is stable.

I have found HPE Proliant ML to be scalable.

We have approximately seven people using this solution in our company.

The technical support from HPE Proliant ML could improve. They are not as fast as they should be. When you have an SLA contractor, they don't give you the parts quickly, it can take weeks sometimes.

When you open a ticket, there is always a long procedure. You have to restart the system and upgrade etc etcetera, but it's something that we usually do by ourselves. We don't need support. It takes a few hours, maybe days to get all the answers, such as you have to update, or you have to restart. That takes a lot of time. Then when you need a part, especially in this period where there is a shortage problem, they don't always have it in the shortest way possible. Sometimes it takes days to have a hard drive or memory delivered.

The initial setup of HPE Proliant ML is easy.

The price of HPE Proliant ML is very good. If we are partners, we have courses to attend and exams to do, but we buy more or less at the same price as everybody else. We have a small discount which should be increased.

We don't have a reason why we decided on HPE Proliant ML instead of Dell or something else, we found out it's the most available in the market and this is why we chose it.

I rate HPE Proliant ML an eight out of ten.

ProLiant is the industry standard and the most popular selling rack mount server in the history of rack mount servers. We use them out of momentum.

The quality of the cases has gone down. They flex a lot.

I’ve used the product for more years than I care to count.

They are a very stable product for us and are just as reliable as the blade servers.

We use them for remote offices, normally in pairs, and we haven’t had any issues. They’re easy to work on and can deal with tight quarters where it is really hot.

HP support is very good. I've never had an issue with it. HP stands behind their product so they work hard to fix issues.

To pick a solution, we generally create a matrix and then fill in what we want out of the product. We pump in vendors and choose whoever meets the targets that we set. I would rate the ProLiant a 9 out of 10.

We use the standard version of these servers. They're very useful for us and are the only servers we use for all our server needs.

We're standardized with these servers with the accompanying support and hardware. It makes things much more efficient for us to maintain and operate. Plus, it's easy for staff to manage.

We first used them 25 years ago, and therefore have many different generations of them. We actually have thousands of them in our data centers.

They deploy without issues.

We have stability problems when we install new generations, but they're usually resolved within six months or so.

It's very scalable.

I think that technical support is good enough for us.

The initial setup is straightforward.

Just use it.

I've used these servers for 20 years since the days of Compaq, and so they're easy for me to use. They're good products and once you learn them, they're simple to manage for administrators and IT infrastructure teams. That's really the most important feature -- the ease of use.

This is a bit of a strange question because it's not a perfect solution for an organization that is reliant on its customers. The servers are not only for us but for our customers as well because, ultimately, we work for our customers. These servers let us provide the best service to our customers.

The software needs some improvement, especially when there's an issue. When implementing software updates, patches, or fixes, sometimes we need to stop a part of the service. Of course, this is downtime that interrupts services and impacts the relationships we have with our customers. We need to be able to rely on software that won't require downtime to update or at least have much more minimal effect on our business when there is a required update.

Deployment has been generally good with only minor issues.

It's very stable, except where I've pointed out the need to stop parts of the services for software updates, patches, or fixes.

It has scaled for us without issues.

Technical support is good.

The initial setup is fairly straightforward, particularly the hardware. The software has a bit of complexity and there's, again, the issue of updates and patches.

Complete video overview:

I can update this soon with benchmark results and also coming soon is memory configurations.

Ease of use. When you use one HPE item, it's very simple to get into anything else, software-wise. It's all about consistency and quality. I would actually say that we've had a lot less down time or minimal issues with the HPE hardware than with any other hardware we've had over the years.

Dependability. That is a big thing for us, because we are in healthcare.

I would like see better integration with OneView.

The product is totally stable, until you're playing around with some of the updates and stuff. Other than that, it is stable.

Scalability is there and it's very good.

Technical support is very good.

We are provincially-driven in Canada. The hardware that we purchase is all purchased through a provincial agreement. We have to go with whatever they go with. We previously had IBM, up to five years ago. Then we had to start implementing HPE gear, due to the provincial requirements, based on RFQs and RFPs.

The setup was very straightforward.

We have been evaluating other options. We have looked here and there at other vendors along the way. We do have other vendor equipment in our data center.

When selecting a vendor, we look for customer service, which is the most important thing, and then product reliability. We need as many nines as we can get.

Do your research and make sure that it fits your solution. There are so many new options out there.

• The high resolution function is very good, one of the best on the market.
• It allows users to manage it remotely if something happens, which is quite neat.

Our main concern is having to rebuy the solution or having downtime, so the fact that these servers run well and do not break often addresses our concern.

The HP writing systems could be more customer-focused instead of process-focused. It can take some companies quite a while to write.

It deploys without issue.

I give it a nine out of 10. It is generally very stable.

It's scalable, depending on the services that you are running. This is a known factor, so you should plan for it.

I have found technical support to be responsive.

I have found that the bigger the case that you want, the better the price.

We evaluated Dell, but found that HPE fit our needs better. We found that HPE worked better in our environment, and also, that our staff were more competent with HPE than with Dell.