IBM NS1 Connect Reviews

The biggest thing that we're doing with it is using the DNS based CDN load balancing.

Hudl provides data and video as a coaching tool for Coaches and Athletes around the world. We provide vaious tools for our users to stream, edit, and pair stats with their games and practices. Our video is deployed around the world in different Amazon regions, and we use Fastly, CloudFront, and Quantil. We use NS1's GEOFencing and Pulsar filters to serve over the best performing CDNs in the regions where content is accessed. NS1 manages the DNS for many of our static content domains. 

We use NS1's terraform provider to control deployment of our NS1 infrastructure. Hudl uses terraform because it allows us to control our infrastructure as code. In the world of software engineering, infrastructure as code is powerful. NS1 maintaining and providing a Terraform provider for us, has simplified our deployment and management of the system. It is made it significantly easier to deploy, and vast changes than it was with any of our previous solutions. Previously, we were with Cedexis and we moved to NS1 when Cedexis decided to freeze platform improvements.

It has also improved our DNS response time over Cedexis by 15 to 20 percent.

The ease of use of their real-time metrics for making decisions has also been a big plus, helping us to validate that our changes were successful in achieving the business use cases we set out to achieve.

Collection RUM (Real User Metrics) and using them in NS1 Pulsar filters. This has been really valuable as it allows us to determine the best, and most performant CDNs for our users. It has proven valuable at responding to and recovering from unexpected downtime from any of our multiple CDNs.

We also use their Terraform plugins to do our deployment, instead of going through their CLI or their console. We find Terraform to be a really powerful tool when using NS1. Terraform allows us to track infrastructure changes and push large scales changes more easily.

The fact that it is an API-first platform for DNS and application traffic management is what makes their Terraform solution possible. We haven't directly integrated with their APIs from any of our solutions. I know I really appreciate a company that adheres to an API-first approach, because it unlocks a lot of potential to really customize tools to meet our needs.

I would love to see improvement in the testing capabilities they provide. They have a simulate-filter feature so that you can simulate how your traffic would flow, based on their Filter Chains. I believe that was shut off for quite some time. Having that as a way to test our load-balanced CDN structure would be fantastic.

We've been using NS1 Managed DNS, primarily for CDN balancing, since 2019.

I've been very happy with the stability of NS1. We haven't encountered any downtime.

It definitely scales well. We are a global company and have seen our streaming footprint grow and grow, year over year. The ability of NS1 to scale to meet our needs has not been a concern for us. Scaling doesn't add any complexity to our NS1 deployment.

Working with NS1's customer success team has been a fantastic experience. They're very responsive and very willing to help. Altogether, they're a great team to work with.

Positive

We were evaluating another company at the time and they actually recommended NS1. They had heard multiple people were looking to change from Cedexis, given the Cedexis announcement that they were going to stop development on their platform.

I managed the entire migration from Cedexis to NS1. It was fairly straightforward. There were a couple of things that were a little harder to wrap my head around, such as some of the specifics of some of the filter settings, but overall it was a pretty straightforward process.

Because of the number of domains that were involved, it took us almost exactly one month. There was zero downtime involved in the migration.

We have absolutely seen return on our investment. The code deployability and the manageability of the service have saved us a significant amount of time when testing changes that we're considering making to our balancing network.

We have been very happy with the licensing and pricing. They were able to give us a really good deal on that front, one that matched our expectations.

We evaluated a CDN load balancer solution from Nice People at Work as well as a couple of others.

We chose NS1 for several reasons. First, we love the extensibility and the customizability of their Filter Chain setup. We thought that it was unmatched compared to the other offerings on the market, and was going to best replicate what we had with Cedexis, and fit our business use case needs.

We have also started to make a move, across the board, to Terraform as an infrastructure deployment code management solution. The fact that NS1 had, and were regularly updating, their Terraform providers was a big plus for our system. 

The manageability, deployability, and overall points of presence around the world, where their DNS system has been deployed, are just fantastic. We did a lot of testing on DNS response when we were first evaluating them, and it was light years ahead of the competition.

The odds are that a free cloud provider is not going to be able to match the performance and the extensibility of a paid solution like NS1. Ultimately, that delayed response is going to affect your users and their impression of your site.

I couldn't recommend a better product than NS1 for managed DNS and CDN load balancing right now. They provide a great solution for managed CDN balancing.

The product is a DNS as a service and we have automated the creation and deletion of all sorts of DNS records.

We needed to have the fastest and most secure and resilient DNS possible, and that's what we got. We don't worry about denial of service attacks on the DNS, as we've seen other large vendors go through. We have access to a significant and forward-thinking feature set that allows us to use things like DNSSEC fairly easily.

Our DNS response times have improved significantly. I have not compared data within the past year but at the time, we looked at a 99.9% evaluation and saw that NS1 was the most effective and fastest solution.

We have access to enterprise tooling that allows us to have a single pane of glass between our internal DNS solutions and our external ones. We also have the ability to use advanced routing techniques with the rules engine or the additional tooling that NS1 provides.

The application traffic management capabilities using the API are excellent. We orchestrate that API using Terraform, which means that there are no manual steps involved in bringing up a piece of infrastructure that needs a DNS record or maintaining hygiene in our DNS records because services are taken down. All of it is orchestrated with the use of the API with Terraform on top to achieve it. Overall, it's a very robust API and it meets our needs.

While it doesn't apply to the entire company, this product allows us to utilize automation through the API, which saves us a significant amount of time and eliminates manual changes that are error-prone.

We have been unaffected by major DDoS attacks because of the architecture.

This product has allowed us to reduce or eliminate DNS maintenance work. I can't estimate how much time this has saved us but being able to use an API versus manual maintenance means that we don't really have to do any maintenance. We've been given a solution that allows us to automate everything that we need to do.

The automation provided by NS1 means that we no longer have to focus on that work, which allows us to assign staff to other tasks. Time is saved because we don't really use manual processes with the DNS. We try to automate everything we do in the DevOps team, so this has been effective for us.

The most valuable features are the DNSSEC and the general reliability and speed of the service. We find that the low latency access to DNS queries has a direct effect on the customer experience. Visiting a site, whether it's an AdTech-based solution or marketing tech, the fact that whatever we're rendering on a page can be rendered better than the industry standard, in terms of time, ensures a better user experience.

The Application Telemetry feature is awesome. This includes latency detection and it allows us to detect where a customer may run into latency on the internet, giving us the opportunity to route around it. It contributes to providing the best user experience for our clients.

Using the Pulsar feature has certainly improved our user experience. Using Pulsar with telemetry monitoring between the customer and the endpoint, we are able to detect traffic and route it appropriately, which ensures the uptime of our applications and web properties. It also ensures that the lowest latency experience is possible.

We would really like them to become a DNS registrar.

I have been using NS1 Managed DNS for approximately seven years, since 2014, across companies.

I don't have any issues with stability.

Scalability-wise, I haven't had any issues with this product. It is being used wherever we're using DNS and as our business grows, it will be utilized more.

We have a DevOps team and an infrastructure team that uses NS1. The DevOps team mainly manages the automation of the cloud infrastructure and tools, whereas the infrastructure team manages our legacy on-premises data center.

This product provides the scalability we need to help meet SLAs and customers' demands without adding complexity, which is very important to us. Although it doesn't happen as often anymore, there can be significant changes in the demand for our service. This has the potential to overwhelm services, just like we see in denial of service attacks. However, the available capacity in NS1 has meant that we've never had a challenge with that.

I have worked with the customer success team and the experience was world-class. They're a customer-first team and they are always available. We reach out to them on Slack and they're always there for us. They're straightforward and transparent about any possible issues that they have on their side and overall, it's a wonderful experience.

The same is true for the product's technical support. They're always there for us and transparent about any challenges.

In the past, the company used Dyn, which is now by Oracle. I have also used UltraDNS.

There were several reasons that we switched. The number one reason is support and service, the second is the forward-thinking functionality and features, and the third reason is the cost.

At this company, the initial setup was very straightforward.

It was an import, and it was completed in a matter of hours or less.

Our implementation strategy was to import or migrate the zones from a previous NS1 account that was owned by another company, and then make the necessary registrar changes. During our migration, there was zero downtime.

I implemented NS1 Managed DNS at my current company. We completed the deployment in-house.

ROI is hard to quantify but in terms of application uptime and customer experience, we have seen a return on our investment.

The cost of this product is one of the reasons that we chose it.

There may be overage costs in addition to the standard licensing fees, although I haven't experienced them.

I looked at the Dyn and UltraDNS solutions. I also looked at Akamai Fast DNS and some of the cloud services. The two main reasons that we chose NS1 are the low-latency DNS, and a feature set that was unique and seemed to be beyond what anyone else was doing.

My advice for anyone who thinks that they don't need a solution like this because they have a free or basic DNS with their cloud provider is that they need to evaluate how DNS solutions may affect the customer experience. They should consider the global footprint of NS1, the network architecture, and where they implement Anycast. If these things don't matter then they're probably not running a business that relies on website revenue or has a website that represents their business.

The biggest lesson that I have learned from using this product is how easy it was to implement it, and that doing so probably reduces the risk of migrating to a new DNS solution.

This is a product that I have recommended to many different people. In general, I would say that this has been the easiest solution to manage and implement.

I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

NS1 holds all of our domains.

When we started using it, we didn't use it with API automation. Today, we do everything with automation and run everything with our automation, so that any change we run, all the data is backed up with GIT. Changes are done with an API so that there is no manual work. It reduces errors significantly and allows us to quickly roll back all the activities on the platform. It works flawlessly for us. Deployments are very fast. There's absolutely no complaint there.

We manage our internet facing traffic with it.

We use it for traffic optimization. I have optimized the traffic using this feature by 20%.

DNS obviously plays a major role in DDoS attacks. It's something that is under attack, but it's also a major player in its ability to defend. NS1 has been doing an amazing job with that.

It has improved our DNS response times as well. 

We've been using Managed DNS for the past 10 years. We moved from a different vendor a few years ago. Generally speaking, I would say that Managed DNS reduces the overhead. 

NS1's automation has enabled us to assign tasks to other work because we have very little DNS right now because it's all managed. It frees up SRE time to deal with actual internal system and application management, instead of managing the infrastructure that can be managed by a third party.

It helped to improve our end-user experience because users get better service by accelerating the response time.

We have also seen benefits when it comes to speed, time, and cost.

The ability to manage traffic, what's called Smart Domains or Smart Record, enables us to provide our customers the relevant, closest data center by providing the correct IP address according to geography or other logic. The ability to see real-time performance is also very useful. 

Everything we download into our observability platform so that we can also track any changes in traffic behavior or things like that is also something that we use quite a lot. I'd say traffic management, the speed of updates, and observability are the top three things that we use.

Observability means monitoring the API, the ability to see the traffic at the different levels, the ability to connect the right record to the right place, and then see everything within the platform or within our observability platform. It is really useful. The automation and the fact that they provide the connectivity into Terraform, for example, is very useful because it allows for ease of integration. I don't have to write the right API integrations myself. We can actually use industry standards that are available out there.

There could maybe be additional ways to manage traffic. There are no major improvements we're looking for. It's a very complete solution. 

I have been using NS1 Managed DNS for over four years. 

The platform itself is stable and highly available. We had very few incidents and never full downtime.

We have not found any scalability issues. We are running a pretty large operation ourselves, of around 100,000 requests per second, and we have never had any scalability issues with the platform. It's always scaled to the size that we need.

It provides scalability to help meet SOA and customers' demands without adding complexity. DNS is a basic part of any solution. And once you have 100,000 requests coming in and you need to make sure that the connectivity is there, the response time is there, the error levels are as low as possible, and every request actually gets an answer. If a third party can do this and I can take care of my actual application and not think about the path into my application, that is very useful.

The only time we used support was when we migrated the additional features around security. They were highly professional and available. They are very good at what they do.

Post-deployment their support was very good. I would rate them a ten out of ten. They are very knowledgeable, not only about their product but about general DNS protocols, from performance to global interconnectivity. They were able to look at the whole picture and the small details within the picture as well.

We switched from Akamai. It was slower and had fewer features.

The initial setup was very straightforward. Using the migration itself was easy. The ongoing monitoring and change for the service, the support that we got from NS1, was all very clear. They are all very professional. There was no downtime. It's very, very straightforward. It took a few weeks. It was very short. 

We kept a backup of the old service up and running, and moved 50% of the traffic into the new DNS and then into the new managed service. Then once we saw everything was running smoothly, we deployed the rest.

We were working with NS1's customer success team during our deployment. I was satisfied with their support. 

We have seen better performance. It's very hard to measure if there is an ROI here, but we have absolutely seen better performance, and that is the important part for us.

We also looked at Neustar. NS1 solution has many more features and it works faster than any of the other solutions. It was also that the pricing was clearer and much easier to work with in terms of the tiers of the pricing. It was really the full package.

For those who have a free cloud provider or basic DNS, I would say that the road into the application and the road into your infrastructure is part of the actual solution that you provide. DNS is part of that pavement. That is the road that end-users reach your application. The higher quality you can have there, especially if it's at a reasonable price means that you will be able to better serve your customers. And that is an important part of IT. Eventually, we are here to serve the business and if we can serve them better then it has an impact.

Once you have it side-by-side to your existing solution and the stability, speed, reduced error level, the easy connectivity into other platforms, observability, and automation are all worth the investment in engineering time and cost.

I would rate NS1 Managed DNS a ten out of ten.