Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Manager - Network, Server, Storage and Virtualization at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Automation with recorded scripting allows customized scenarios to be created and edited. It does not provide easy diagnostics for end-to-end transaction monitoring.

What is most valuable?

Automation with recorded scripting: This is a nice feature, which allows customized testing scenarios to be created and edited depending on the testing needs at the time.

How has it helped my organization?

It has allowed more thorough testing with performance-based testing, in addition to regression testing and regular testing with each software release.

What needs improvement?

It does not provide easy diagnostics to ascertain end to end transaction monitoring. It shows statistics on individual class calls and it is challenging to aggregate the data into a single end-to-end transaction based on a single individual user experience.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have used this solution for over two years.

Buyer's Guide
Oracle Application Testing Suite
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Oracle Application Testing Suite. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

No issues with deployment.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No stability issues encountered.

What about the implementation team?

A system integrator installed the tool and has provided the support and expertise to initially run the testing and train our staff.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The tool is expensive to purchase and use based on licensing requirements for number of users.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user348147 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Test Engineer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
It helped in running performance testing cycles and identifying the bottlenecks of the application, helping our clients to run their application successfully and smoothly.

Valuable Features

Openscript and Oracle Load Testing (OLT) as I worked on performance testing with this tool.

Improvements to My Organization

It helped in running performance testing cycles and identifying the bottlenecks of the application, helping our clients to run their application successfully and smoothly.

Also, I used it for automating manual flows, which helped in saving time and effort in manual testing.

Room for Improvement

Improvements can be made in a number of protocol support areas, including enhanced Citrix support.

Also, the reporting utility for load testing could be improved.

Use of Solution

I've used it for three years.

Stability Issues

Garbage collection of our WebLogic server was not working properly when running large volumes of performance tests.

Customer Service and Technical Support

My experiences are good. There is a forum where you can post your issues and experts and others users will answer them.

Also, a service request which will be resolved quickly would be nice. There were a few patches given by the dev team to resolve issues.

Initial Setup

Initial setup is straightforward. It will install Oracle Database, WebLogic Server, and other components by itself. At every step you will be prompted on your screen, but no other setups steps are required.

Implementation Team

We implemented it in-house, but only a person who has good experience should be involved in the implementation, otherwise some issues might come later.

Other Advice

If you are using the Oracle bundled application then it is he best tool available in the market. But in some areas it lacks features and protocol support that its competitors, such as HP LoadRunner, have.

You should have a good and experienced person working with it, and also they should take people who have prior Java programming knowledge. The tool uses Eclipse IDE and Java script.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Oracle Application Testing Suite
October 2024
Learn what your peers think about Oracle Application Testing Suite. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user181500 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Manager with 51-200 employees
Vendor
Load testing is a valuable feature however the tool runs out of memory when the recording flows are long

What is most valuable?

  • Recording and playback
  • Load testing 

How has it helped my organization?

Our benchmark load tests for a major release involving various scenarios with a combination of different virtual users relied on the recording, playback and eventual load testing capabilities of OATS.

What needs improvement?

  1. The tool runs out of memory when the recording flows are long and involve many screens despite increasing the memory settings for OpenScript 
  2. We found the tool impossible to use for client side performance testing without filtering out JS, CSS, PNG etc as the method would error due to a Java method size limitation. 
  3. Parameterization of variables using regular expressions was not a foolproof way of running tests as it would mostly work for a single user but fail during load testing. 
  4. Parameterization involving SQL queries was not straightforward 
  5. Except a YouTube video/PDF which covers some basics and is probably outdated now, there are no tutorials available for other functionalities that the recording tool provides.There is no in-depth tutorial of the load testing interface and troubleshooting steps. 
  6. Collection of system metrics - although there are multiple parameters defined, it did provide a holistic picture of the state of the system.We had to implement our own way of obtaining this. 
  7. Load testing web interface did not provide details about errors. The only way to correlate was to inspect server logs.

For how long have I used the solution?

One year.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Yes, with 12.2.x

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Yes, 12.2 was not stable. Upgrading to 12.4.x resolved a lot of previously known issues

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

No issues encountered.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This tool did a much better job recording the http requests during web load testing than other open source tools. Cookie management and other url parameters were handled efficiently and were easier to identify in the tree view.

How was the initial setup?

It was straightforward for the most part except that at times the services wouldn't run and un-installation messed things up.

What about the implementation team?

In-house.

What was our ROI?

I believe we made a wise choice despite some shortcomings and hiccups.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated other options.

What other advice do I have?

Read the tutorial and try out a few scenarios before going full throttle.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
QA Expert at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
Be sure your team has the right amount of expertise in OpenScript (Java) before deciding to use this product

What is most valuable?

Importing a RUEI log into OATS to convert it into a load test

How has it helped my organization?

For a few years, OATS was the only tool that allowed us to load test our Computer Telephone Integration (CTI) with Siebel.

What needs improvement?

Our team is a contractor for a Siebel call center solution for the US government. Using Seibel means we are mostly an Oracle shop, but most of our test tools are HP. The one exception to that is OATS, which was formerly owned by Empirix when it was called eTester and eLoad. OATS has some promising features that frankly we wish we could utilize, but so far we haven’t had much luck doing so. Previously we did use it as a way of load testing the Computer Telephone Integration (CTI) aspect of Siebel. Even this needed to have custom Java code to implement though, and now that LoadRunner 11.5x is released, it can support our CTI load testing efforts as well, so we’ve gone away from using OATS for this.

For how long have I used the solution?

2 years off and on.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

Nothing significant.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

No

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Not up to 300 vusers, though this is not a large amount.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We use Loadrunner for all other load testing, but used OATS and Open Script just for CTI load testing.

How was the initial setup?

Straightforward for initial setup, but complex for what we wanted to do. OATS runs as a suite hosted on a web server, so users access the test management piece via a URL. Scripting is done via Oracle’s OpenScript, which is their scripting development environment with Java, so being able to program in Java is probably the most important skill to have for using the tool.

What about the implementation team?

Directly from Oracle.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We researched if this could be done in Loadrunner first.

What other advice do I have?

Be sure your team has the right amount of expertise in OpenScript (Java) before deciding to use this product.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Senior QA Engineer at a tech services company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Doesn't require a separate management tool but it is lacking support
Pros and Cons
  • "We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."
  • "We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."
  • "The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use the cloud deployment model for this solution. 

What is most valuable?

We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good.

It has a very good inbuilt reporting system.

What needs improvement?

There is no support for this particular tool and you don't have a very big knowledge base on Google. It should order the tests so that you can automatically write a path and test it on it. The object identification feature can be enabled and leveraged to other levels and there's some kind of knowledge base. These are the two main areas that need improvement.

The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved. 

The third thing, is the help and the support or the knowledge base needs improvement. Otherwise, it's overall a very good tool.

It should have proper integration with CI/CD tools or any plugins. There's good documentation with Jenkins or JIRA.

It should be a little more flexible like Selenium for the user to try with different locators or the different writing of XPath. The slowness can be identified and when we try to automate any internet, the application which can only be opened in Internet Explorer has some challenges.

It needs better automation. I think it is there but some enhancements should be done. Overall, it is a very good tool that is better than some other automation tools on the market. It supports various entrepreneur platform applications and applications developed with different coding background and it's all very good.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using this solution for around four years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It's a stable one except for one or two incidents, it's stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It has good scalability. It can integrate it with CI/CD tools and all those things. There is no inbuilt configuration or setups available to link it with other tools or scale it with other CI/CD tools. Those tools are lacking configuration abilities. It's a lack of knowledge from our side of the this because of the unavailability of the knowledge base. We haven't tried with different stops.

We have around seven or eight users using this solution. We require two staff members for the deployment and maintenance. 

How are customer service and technical support?

I would rate their technical support 2.5 out of ten. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have only used Oracle. I didn't use a previous solution. 

What other advice do I have?

It's really a very good tool. My advice to somebody considering this solution is to speak to the vendor, make sure to make your requirements clear and have clear answers from the vendor's side. Ask what support is available and what the scalability terms are and what features are available to integrate with CI/CD tools.

The tool is very good. There's no doubt about it so. In terms of the properties or object identification media, there could be some more or better documentation, a better knowledge base or better enhancements should be available.

I would rate it a seven out of ten. 

Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner.
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Product Manager - Cloudtestr, Test Automation Evangelist at Cloudtestr
MSP
The three tools which I used most were Winrunner, QTP and OATS. I feel OATS is best.
Pros and Cons
  • "User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."
  • "To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

What is most valuable?

  1. Java as native supported language.
  2. User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps.
  3. The initial kick of time of a functional test automation script is lesser than other popular tools like QTP. But not as quick as selenium :). But selenium supports of automation of only web applications.
  4. Stable enough for Oracle EBS Applications and other products of Oracle, there are some components which are not recognized by other test automation products but are recognized by OATS ( Oracle Application Testing Suite )

What needs improvement?

To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing. Which otherwise they have a pretty good coverage to test all Cloud or Web Based applications.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have used for about 8 years now, had worked with this tool from the time of inception at oracle, as I had worked at ORACLE for 7.5 years and used OATS for most of the time. It was our default solution for test automation of Oracle EBS Applications.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

OATS 12.5.0.2 has a pretty smooth installation process.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In budding stages, the product had serious stability issues, but ORACLE has put its best people behind and made the product quite stable. Now I feel its the best tool to automate any of the Oracle Products, which include Oracle EBS Applications, PeopleSoft, JD Edwards, Siebel, Adobe Flex, ADF applications, etc..

How are customer service and technical support?

The technical support on Linkedin Groups and Direct support are good, would rate it as 4 out of 5

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Winrunner earlier and later HP had stopped its support so we had to switch to another Test automation product and when an internal tool could support, there was no point in paying to external companies, while I was working with ORACLE

How was the initial setup?

Simple and easy

What was our ROI?

There was huge ROI, as we stopped all Licenses that were paid to HP and used something internally at ORACLE

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Yes, we tried with QTP, but it was doing no good than internal tool for test automation of Oracle EBS Applications.

What other advice do I have?

It's a really amazing solution, which I have ever used, three tools which I used most were Winrunner, QTP and OATS. I feel OATS is best, even now I am out of ORACLE I believe OATS has much more value, compared to others. and I liked it so much that I started writing my experiences over my personal blog which is http://testingtools.co

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user763800 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user763800Senior Test Engineer with 51-200 employees
Vendor

Could you please let me know, from where I can the pricing info of OATS ?

it_user37545 - PeerSpot reviewer
Quality Assurance at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Vendor
Sorting tests is pretty easy but updating somebody’s account access sometimes had unexpected and bad results

What is most valuable?

Test Manager “TESTS”

How has it helped my organization?

1. I can organize test scripts pretty well.

2. The custom dashboard views are nice to look at.

3. Sorting tests is pretty easy.

What needs improvement?

1. The installation routine desperately needs improvement. It was very easy to mess up.

2. The “un-install” is basically not supported and resulted also in a messed up computer.

3. In the OATS Administrator tool, setting user assignments and roles to projects was tricky, scary and dangerous. Updating somebody’s account access sometimes had unexpected and bad results like getting “locked out” of the product.

For how long have I used the solution?

Two years.

What was my experience with deployment of the solution?

The test installation pretty much destroyed my computer’s laptop performance. It had to be “reimaged” to recover. It was eventually installed on a dedicated server.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Some user accounts had to be removed and new ones created because of corruption.

For example:

  1. At some point my user account could not move or organize the position of folders and tests.
  2. Another user would crash the entire product whenever she choose to open one specific project.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I am not aware of any issues.

How are customer service and technical support?

Customer Service:

The training people were good.

Technical Support:

I have not had to deal with support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We also use TFS. We are using OATS because my company purchased an Oracle ERP solution.

How was the initial setup?

There did not appear to be a simple installation routine. The initial setup was complicated with many parts to consider including binaries and a local database.`

What about the implementation team?

I believe a vendor did the original implementation.

What other advice do I have?

Brace yourself for bumps in the road. Have patience. Find talented people to help.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user347697 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Performance Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Vendor
The scripts are written in Java, so migration from C to Java accelerated and simplified script development. However, the load testing API wasn't rich.

What is most valuable?

The best feature of this and Load Test is simplicity. They are probably not as functional as the corresponding HP products, but you can start using them immediately after installation. Script development platform is based on Eclipse IDE and was much better and stable than LoadRunner VUGen 11.5 and earlier versions.

Load Test has perfect monitoring features. It fully supports JMX (we were able to monitor WebLogic internals in a couple of clicks), modern SNMP versions, flexible custom metrics, etc. We didn’t have any problems with collecting data we wanted from Windows, Linux, Solaris machines, and that’s really great. I can’t compare it with HP SiteScope (don’t have much experience with it), but it definitely beats standalone HP LoadRunner facilities.

I also liked the web interface of the Load Test controller. It supports remote test execution and provides quite convenient API. You don’t have to use separate solution as Performance Center or LoadRunner Analysis to create test reports and provide remote access to your test artifacts.

How has it helped my organization?

The scripts are written in Java, so migration from C (used in our LoadRunner scripts) to Java significantly accelerated and simplified script development. We have also managed to monitor our infrastructure more precisely.

Load Test provides great facilities and templates to monitor other Oracle products and create simpler scripts to automate load test pipeline. You load the script into Load Test, run the test, and generate the report.

What needs improvement?

I’m not sure about the functional testing API, but the load testing one wasn’t rich. We had to extend it by adding lots of functions, but it can be easily done. Transaction handling was very simple and I’d say quite primitive. We were unable to pause, dynamically create them and change their state, such as transaction name and other properties.

API was convenient but too poor, but I know that Oracle has extended it. Reporting features were very simple as well, especially report templates.

For how long have I used the solution?

We've used it for about a year. We’ve migrated our scripts and related test automation (e.g. report generation) successfully. It wasn’t perfect. We had to migrate our HP LoadRunner 11.5 scripts to Oracle Linux Test, and we had to do a lot of manual work to add features missing in it, such as writing custom functions in scripts, calculate target metrics with SQL on its database, etc. Though it was mostly stable and reliable, Test Management wasn’t. However, things may have changed in updated versions.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

As far as I remember, we had lots of issues with Test Management stability, but the recent version are stable. We had several issues with Load Test monitoring, but were quickly fixed by Load Test developers.

How are customer service and technical support?

It's excellent. We usually got help in a couple of days (hours in critical situations). The Load Test team frequently asked for feedback from our managers and included our suggestions into releases.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We tried a lot of solutions and used HP LoadRunner for six to seven years before switching. When Oracle Application Test Suite became ready for enterprise usage and met our needs, we started to use it, partially because it’s free for usage with other Oracle products.

How was the initial setup?

It was really simple. The installation package can do everything for you (install WebLogic and Oracle XE) or you can customize the process. Anyway installation process is very transparent and flexible.

What about the implementation team?

We did it ourselves with a little assistance from the development team. The documents are a good starting point so almost all of the questions can be addressed after reading the manual.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

It was completely free for us, because we use it with other Oracle products.

What other advice do I have?

It is a simple yet useful tool for performance testing. Compared with LoadRunner, it’s definitely less functional. I’d recommend you to try their free (development) version to understand what it does and does not.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Oracle Application Testing Suite Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: October 2024
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Oracle Application Testing Suite Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.