OWASP Zap Reviews

We only tried out the demo to see what the solution offers and how it performs overall business scanning. They also offer open-source projects.

There is definitely room for improvement. I prefer Burp Suite to OWASP Zap because of the extensive coverage it offers. I also think it should have an open-source tool. I would also love to see an improvement in visibility.

The OWASP Zap solution was very stable during the few days we used it.

The scalability of this product is very good.

I will rate this product a seven out of ten, because I think the visibility needs to be improved, and the support person needs to do a better job. What's more, additional features, like domain support or different authentication support also needs to be improved.

• Very good open source security tool supporting the top 10 vulnerabilities (Injections, Session Management, XSS, Authentication, Authorization, etc.).
• Simple and easy to learn and master.
• Good online product documentation.
• Built in features include: Intercepting proxy, Plug and Hack support, Automated scanning, Passing scan, Fuzzer, Traditional and Ajax Crawling and Web Socket support and so on.
• Detailed reporting mechanism.
• The tool has been translated in 25 different languages.
• Can be executed through GUI, command line and also in Daemon mode with the help of REST API.
• Very good API support for automating security tests.
• Supports multiple platforms like Mac, Linux and Windows.
• It's easy to create add-ons and extensions to scale up the features of the tool.

We have leveraged our existing functional tests for security testing by integrating web driver scripts with the OWASP ZAP tool.

Online documentation can be improved to utilize all features of ZAP and API methods to make use in automation.

6 months

Did not encounter any issues. It's easy to install and configure.

So far I am very comfortable and did not find any stability related issues.

It is scalable, by creating new extensions and add-ons for the tool. But we faced a couple of challenges initially which were solved with the help of online documentation

4/10

4/10

No

It is very simple to install and configure.

We have implemented this with the in-house team support.

Instead of creating a new framework for security tests, it helped us to leverage (reuse) existing functional test automation framework for security tests. This reduces lot of rework.

It is highly recommended as it is an open source tool.

No, we are happy with the features provided with this tool, but if you want to go with static code analysis for security tests, we need to find a different option here.

Very good and useful tool for security testing and penetrations testers.

We use OWASP Zap for web application security scanning.

They offer free access to some other tools.

Zap could improve by providing better reports for security and recommendations for the vulnerabilities. Additionally, they should allow more testing other than web applications, such as on the cloud and VMs.

I have been using OWASP Zap for approximately three months.

I have used other solutions, such as AngularJS.

The installation is straightforward.

This solution is open source and free.

I have been evaluating Armor for my teammates who are using ZAP. I have found that Armor is better than ZAP and we are looking to switch solutions.

I rate OWASP Zap a six out of ten.

We primarily use this product for web application scanning.

The interface is easy to use.

The documentation needs to be improved because I had to learn everything from watching YouTube videos.

I have been working with OWASP Zap for about three months.

I have not experienced any trouble in terms of stability.

Scalability has not been an issue, so far. There are four of us in the company that can log in to use it.

I have not been in contact with technical support.

The initial setup was straightforward. For me, I just had to press "Next" several times. Between the installation, downloading videos, and investigating how to deploy it, I would say that the process took roughly a day.

I did not require third-party assistance for the deployment.

This solution is providing us with value and as long as it continues to do so, we'll continue to use it.

This is an open-source solution and can be used free of charge.

This is a good product where most of the functionality is free, which is why I recommend that others use it.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

The use case was we needed to scan our website to find out what vulnerabilities were present.

We use it to scan the website, then take a report about what vulnerabilities are present on it. Next, we will manually verify those vulnerabilities for false positives.

Every now and then, there is an update. They add new vulnerabilities to the scan list. That is where they just keep on improving.

The community support that ZAP provides me. As an open source, it provides me flexibility and is convenient to use.

As security evolves, we would like DevOps built into it. As of now, Zap does not provide this.

I would like to have more vulnerabilities added to the scan list, because as of now, it covers around 72 to 80. I need more because we need broader coverage.

Stability is good.

We have not scaled yet. Though, we should be able to scale.

I have not used any support for this solution yet.

The initial setup is straightforward, because we can integrate it directly into the SDLC.

The community edition updates services regularly. They add new vulnerabilities into the scanning list.