SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Reviews

It prevents some vulnerabilities in the production environment.

I like that it covers most programming languages for source code review.

I also like the procedures that are already built-in that cover most of the items that already exist.

SonarQube does not cover BPM programming language. It only covers the Java layer from BPM WebMethods. When we were faced with this issue with one of your applications, we found that we were not able to scan the BPM code for configurations generated from the WebMethod.

The BPM language is important and should be considered in SonarQube.

It utilizes a lot of resources from the servers. I think this issue should be resolved because it takes approx 20% of the CPU utilization.

Reporting related to SonarQube only exists in the enterprise edition, and not in the Community Edition.

There are no limitations in the lines of code with the Community Edition, but with the Enterprise Version, there are limitations related to the lines of code.

I don't understand why you can use an infinite line code amount with the Community Edition and the Enterprise Edition is limited.

We have been dealing with SonarQube for more than one year.

It is stable in the system environment processes.

We haven't used it with the microservices or containers to check the scalability. We have used it on a Windows Server or Linux Server.

We contacted technical support about the BPM and WebMethod programming language. They supported us with a fast response and provided us with a solution that was not covered on SonarQube.

We only use SonarQube with SonarScanner.

The initial setup is simple and straightforward.

I am a consultant and my team completed the system server.

I requested this license for one million lines of code and they accepted this.

I don't know what was already paid.

We evaluated Micro Focus Fortify. From a cost perspective, we selected SonarQube. Now we are using the enterprise license as well. 

We are telecommunication customers, who have purchased a license. We are the largest telecommunications company in Saudi Arabia.

I would rate SonarQube an eight out of ten.

We use SonarQube to scan our security protection.

It is a very good tool for analysis and security vulnerability checking.

The scanning part could be improved in SonarQube. We have used Coverity for scanning, and we have the critical issues reported by Coverity. When we used SonarQube for scanning and looked at the results, it seems that some of them have incorrect input. This part can be improved for C and C++ languages.

I have been using this solution for a couple of weeks.

It is stable.

We haven't evaluated its scalability.

I just use our internal IT to get support for SonarQube. That is enough for me.

We were previously using Coverity. We used it for three years or so.

We just use the Enterprise SonarQube instance provided by our company.

I would recommend this solution. I would rate SonarQube an eight out of ten.

We use SonarQube for determining code coverage, finding bugs, and searching for security-related issues in our development environment.

The code coverage feature is very good.

When performing the code coverage function, there are a lot of warnings that come up and you may not have time to solve them. You need to have the ability to overrule warnings or issues because it may not be possible to commit the time to resolve them immediately. If the product could assist us with fixing issues by giving us more pointers then it would help to resolve more of the warnings without such a commitment in terms of time.

SonarQube needs some improvement in its ability to find security-related issues.

I have been using SonarQube for the past seven or eight years.

We have not found any bugs or had trouble with stability. We have had some minor hiccups, here and there, but otherwise, we are fine.

We have not found any issues with respect to scalability. 

I have not personally been in contact with technical support. I believe that our team recently had contact with them when we migrated to the newer version, and we received help from their support agent.

I have also used Veracode and when comparing the two, I find that Veracode is better at finding security-related issues during the static code analysis. At the same time, during my PoC with Veracode, they did not claim to be able to provide everything that SonarQube does. 

I was not involved in the initial setup. However, I do know that it can be set up within one or two days.

We have an in-house team for deployment and maintenance.

I am satisfied with the pricing.

In general, I am very satisfied with SonarQube and I highly recommend it. If you are looking for full coverage and quality improvement then it is the best product to use.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We used SonarQube during the development period and AppScan after the system was deployed on the production site.

SonarQube is integrated with the CI/CD infrastructure. It automatically scans for code, detects vulnerabilities, and generates daily reports. SonarQube's integration with the CI/CD infrastructure helps us reduce the effort to scan the code manually.

After scanning our code and generating a report, it would be helpful if SonarQube could also generate a solution to fix vulnerabilities in the report.

I have been using SonarQube for six to seven years.

We haven’t faced any issues with the solution’s performance or stability.

We don't have a support license for SonarQube. We currently use the open-source community, which provides us with much support from communities worldwide.

The solution's initial setup is very easy. We have a team that handles the maintenance of SonarQube in the CI/CD environment.

The solution's deployment takes about two weeks. We have a new software development project, and integrating it into the CI/CD system took about half a working day.

We use the solution free of cost. SonarQube is a cost-efficient solution.

I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution ten out of ten.

We use this solution to configure our pipeline using Jenkins. From an integration perspective, it encompasses many languages and this is very useful.

This solution has helped with the integration and building of our CICD pipeline. Without any scans or assessments, the pipeline and build are not complete. One of the good features of SonarQube is the many languages it supports including Java, dotNET, Typescript and HTML CSS. It also allows us to set custom quality gates and rules.

This solution could be offered on Docker and the cloud. The support for this solution could be improved and the customization rules could also be made simpler. 

I have used this solution for three years. 

This is a stable solution. 

This solution could be scalable, specifically from a reporting perspective. 

I would rate the customer support for this solution a seven out of ten. 

Neutral

I have previously used Checkmarx, Blackbelt and WhiteSource.

We have experienced a good return on investment using this solution. 

This is a good solution if you are looking for good coverage, quality, and vulnerabilities to be highlighted. That being said, there are better solutions in the market when it comes to SAST scanning.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten. 

SonarQube delivers a continuous inspection of code quality.

When comparing other static code analysis tools, SonarQube has fewer false-positive issues being reported. They have a lot of support for different tech stacks. It covers the entire developer community which includes Salesforce or it could be the regular Java.net project. It has actually sufficed all the needs in one tool for static code analysis.

I have been using SonarQube for approximately two years.

The stability of SonarQube is good.

I have found SonarQube to be scalable.

SonarQube needs to improve its support model. They do not work 24/7, and they do not provide weekend support in case things go wrong. They only have a standard 8:00 am to 5:00 pm support model in which you have to raise a support ticket and wait. The support model is not effective for premium customers.

SonarQube is very user-friendly and it works for all tech stacks. It should be easy for any kind of integrations that you need to build. Additionally, SonarQube comes with a lot of in-house APIs.

I rate SonarQube a seven out of ten.

The primary use case of this solution is for static code analysis, and benchmarking our code standards according to our preferences. 

Our builds process through SonarQube and if it passes the required set of requirements we have set, it will then go through to production.

The most valuable features are the segregation containment and the suspension of product services. Also, the library that SonarQube covers is good.

The library could have more languages that are supported. It would be helpful.

There are a few clauses that are specific to our organization, and it needs to improve. It's the reason that were are evaluating other solutions. It creates the ability for the person who releases the authorized release, which is not good. We would like to be able to expand on our work.

MicroFocus, as an example, would be helping us with that area or creating a dependency tree of the code from where it deployed and branching it into your entire code base. This would be something that is very helpful and has helped in identifying the gaps.

It would be great to have a dependency tree with each line of your code based on an OS top ten plugin that needs to be scanned. For example, a line or branch of code used in a particular site that needs to be branched into my entire codebase, and direct integration with Jira in order to assign that particular root to a developer would be really good.

Automated patching for my library, variable audience, and support for the client in the CICD pipeline is all done with a set of different tools, but it would be nice to have it like a one-stop-shop.

I would like to see improvements in defining the quality sets of rules and the quality to ensure code with low-performance does not end up in production. We would also need the ability to edit those rules.

I have been using SonarQube for approximately two years.

The stability is good. 

The branch advanced analysis pull request declarations, they are good and highly valuable, but they are not part of the free edition. They are only available as part of the licensed one.

Currently, we have 1.2 to 1.5 million lines of code. Certainly, if that increases, so would the costs expediently. 

We have 50 developers' licenses.

There is quite a bit of maintenance that is needed. We have a couple of people from our operations team to do the maintaining.

It is integrated with our CICD department and is being used extensively.

We do have plans to increase the usage of SonarQube.

We have used open-source origins of the tools.

PCI is an open-source solution that we used before, and we used Snyk as well.

The initial setup is straightforward.

We did not use a vendor team, it was done by us.

The developer edition is based on cost per lines of code.

Now we are looking for a more mature solution and evaluating other products. We want a complete code analysis platform that is more mature.

We will either go with the paid Developer active license or solutions such as Checkmarx or MicroFocus.

The community edition is quite informative for engineers. The actual code analysis is not conducted on the GitLab flow, but the build pipeline would show the core quantity steps which is part of the criteria.

The trial gives you a way to implement the POC and check if it can be integrated with your own stack. Once the trial expires, you can continue with the same setup for getting the license.

I would rate this solution a six out of ten.

We use SonarQube to find vulnerabilities in the source code, for better code quality, and code security.

The most valuable feature of this solution is that it is free.

There could be better integration with other products.

It could have more functionality, and the updates could be faster.

People must be trained extensively before they can use it.

I have been using SonarQube for three years.

It's a software as a service that you can access from on-premise.

The stability is fine. With any software, you must ensure that you keep up to date with the software. As a result, when there are new ways to attack you, the software detects it. You must be prepared. You can't just put it in and forget about it, you have to stay current.

More than just an environment, it was a project. There were about a dozen developers and five testers to ensure that the developers used the tool before handing it over to the testers. To ensure that everything was in order.

I have not contacted technical support.

Previously, we used Fortify. The company that I worked for owned Fortify. We then sold Fortify to another company. We could look at other products to do the job.

The initial setup was straightforward. It only took about two weeks to deploy.

Like in anything, if you're too restricted, it can result in being problematic, the same if you are too loose. In terms of the length of time it takes to deploy, we try to find a happy medium. Two weeks is reasonable.

I am the team leader, and I was assisted with the deployment by another very knowledgeable individual. We are a team of two.

We have seen a return on investment. It finds potential vulnerabilities inside a program's code. If you catch it and you fix it, it's good.

It's an open-source solution, with no additional costs.

We evaluated other products such as Veracode, Checkmarx as well as SonarQube.

The main difference is that SonarQube is free.

I am an expert in so many things, including security experts. We looked at the various products and chose one. And the reason was that any tool, any automated tool that can detect errors, is preferable to none at all.

Most systems are vulnerable at the application level, which means that people who program in Java or.NET may be brilliant, but they don't know about the security. The advice is that those who work in development must also understand security. They must test for security in the same way they test for whether something is red or blue. My recommendation is to have some type of training and to be aware that the application level is the place where most people attack.

I would rate SonarQube a six out of ten.