WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Reviews

We basically use the solution for the connectors. There are some legacy platforms and the WSO2 provides a good amount of connectors. I'm able to integrate this quickly with those third-party platforms. There are some big mediations that are also required.

The link tool is good. 

There is a good GUI tool where you can define all your requirements. It is very easy to use. 

We are still exploring the entire solution. There are so many solutions, ESB solutions, and we are still learning. 

The interface is very good.

The dashboard is excellent.

The reporting of the solution is very good.

The installation process is easy.

The pricing is okay.

We've found the technical support to be good so far.

The solution can scale well.

I will need some time to reflect on improvements as we are still exploring the product. Maybe in another two or three months, I'd have more insights.

The customization can be a bit difficult.

I've only been using the solution for a month. It hasn't been that long just yet.

The stability is very good. there are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze from what I have seen so far. It's reliable and the performance has been good.

The scalability is good. It's possible to expand it if you need to.

We haven't had any issues with the technical support. They seem to be helpful and responsive. We're satisfied with the level of service we are provided so far.

On this solution, the installation is easy, however, customization, mostly due to the fact that there will be a good amount of customization and mediations, requires expertise. If the people who are implementing the solution have the right set of expertise they will be able to do it. If a novice user is attempting an implementation, they will need some training first.

There is an open-source version, however, we have a subscription. Direct technical support is available when you are on a subscription plan. In the open-source version, you have community-level support where you will get support from the community.

We've also, as per the customer requirement, looked at Mule. We are comparing these two solutions together.

We are a partner with the company.

We always use on-premises deployments as we only work with on-prem.

While I am still exploring the solution, I've so far been pretty satisfied with it. I'd rate it at a nine out of ten so far.

From my experience so far, I would recommend the solution to other users and companies. It's very customizable and the support is there if you need help. Of course, we are still in the design phase, and it is still early.

Our primary use for this product is solution core integration. We recently used this for a project in the financial sector, where we were integrating different legacy systems and internal systems. This was a proof of concept project that has now been completed.

We have also used this solution for other elements, such as presenting management systems and as an API gateway host.

We are using the on-premise deployment model.

The learning curve for this solution is very good.

It is an open-source solution, so it is better in terms of cost.

We had some challenges with the installation of this solution. We were using the open-source version with no support, and I expect that if we had the paid version then this would have been fixed.

I would like to see better documentation for the open-source version. 

Considering the load we had at the time, which was low, it was stable.

We expect that better documentation would help when it comes to scaling this solution.

Currently, the volume is low, with less than one hundred users.

We did not have technical support, although we found that community support was good enough to fulfill our needs.

The initial setup of this solution was simple.

The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge.

My advice for anybody who is implementing this solution is to start with a proof of concept project. That will allow them to properly scale it or benchmark it for their internal capacity.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

We use it to manage five of our vehicles. It's a data integration tool.

The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations. 

The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it.  

I have been using WSO2 for two to three years. 

The stability and scalability are normal. No issues with that. 

We have contacted their support and they were good but not perfect. 

The deployment took a few hours. 

It is possible to start with a free solution, and that's why it is a good starting point.

It is a good solution. It has many integration components. 

I would rate it a six out of ten. Not a ten because it's not so easy and it's a little difficult to deploy on a platform. It is difficult to build a high availability platform.

In the next release, it should be faster.