@Sagar: The price is but more than HP load runner, but it depends how many user licence you are using in Load Runner. Probably, for the same number of users, Appvance and HP LoadRunner will be almost same You can have a demo with Appvance team, they are prompt to it. And…

@Dego Caicedo Lescano: Hi, I have tried the HP tools mentioned. They are quite good and have very good feature. But we have to use them along with some other load testing tool. Appvance provides the feature in one common suite.

True Client Ajax is quite effective for simple Http based Web applications. It saves lots of scripting time. Script modification is also quite easy But True Client has few constraints, I may effect the test results as it consumes quite an amount of memory per vuser…

LoadRunner is a good performance testing tool. But it takes lots time in scripting, if the test cases are very complex, it can take even days to make one script. Re-usability of these complex scripts also becomes a complex job, mostly when the application build are changing…

@imran: NeoLoad and AppVance are good tools performance testing

As far as I know, VB script is the only language that is fully supported by UFT/QTP. Could you please elaborate the need, so that I can update you with a workaround.

Some of the best load testing tools, used most widely -LoadRunner -Neo Load -Appvance , it a new one, but has very good features. LoadRunner is a good tool to use and is most widely used. It has analysis part integrated with the tool. Scripting is complex and time…