Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Badges

20 Points
6 Years

User Activity

About 3 years ago
Hello,  Not the best workload automation but rather mostly aligned to your requirements.  All automation tools have similar features, it is mandatory to stay on a market. Most of schedulers has ability to handle 3000 nodes, even per environment.  It is a good to check last…
About 3 years ago
Hello,  I have found an interesting article about it. Please check it out! https://www.veritis.com/blog/d...
Over 3 years ago
@Mark Francome  I have worked using the configuration you have suggested. The Citrix I have worked on was restricted for any data movement between control-m and my workstation. As a result it was hard to smoothly generate reports, create workflows snapshots and so no. Of…
Over 3 years ago
Personally, I would prefer an unlimited licence. It would give a warranty that you won't hit the wall in moment of reaching license boundaries.   
Over 3 years ago
I agree with @Shlomi Kotv. It depends on your long-term infra development plan.  If you plan to go into the private or public cloud also automation software should go there as well.  In another case, you start facing losses in many fields beginning from bigger processing…
Over 4 years ago
Sometime ago I have preapring a comparison matrix of workload automation tools. Control-M is one of top schedulers it is very up to date regarding cutting-edge technologies with one con - it is a fat client.  It is not web-based so you need to install client on every…
About 6 years ago
lack of status driven agent monitoring
About 6 years ago
affirmative about challenges which should be picked up to improve the support and user experience.
About 6 years ago
Contributed a review of Stonebranch: We use it for scheduling Unix and Wintel batches.