Amazon CloudFront vs IBM Cloud Video comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
6,137 views|5,362 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
85 views|51 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon CloudFront and IBM Cloud Video based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Microsoft, Akamai and others in CDN.
To learn more, read our detailed CDN Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We can personalize a lot of things inside CDN.""The beneficial feature for the entire AWS community is the presence of edge location servers. These servers are strategically located in multiple locations, allowing efficient content delivery from the nearest server.""If you're using AWS entirely, it's smooth sailing.""The product provides reduced latency and quicker site refreshes.""The product is very well interconnected with other Amazon services.""The product's most valuable feature is its ability to deliver content to users nearby.""The most valuable feature of the solution is the speed of delivery.""The distribution aspect of CloudFront and its ability to reduce latency are most beneficial."

More Amazon CloudFront Pros →

"I like the user interface. There aren't too many buttons that the audience will have to fiddle with."

More IBM Cloud Video Pros →

Cons
"The solution can benefit from expanding its data center and server locations to multiple places for smoother content delivery with even lower latency. The latency we experience is sufficient for our needs, and we are doing well. However, if they expand their locations in the future, it could be a positive factor. Its competitors have multiple data and server locations.""The lack of seamless integration made the setup process more complex and required additional research to manage all the services properly.""A lot of caching features must be added to the solution.""There is room for improvement in customer service and support.""The product could support any network load balancer. At present, we can use only Amazon’s load balancer application.""I have utilized certain characteristics and invested effort in reading the documentation, which proved to be challenging.""They could be expanding the number of locations available. It will help users easily access content.""Sometimes, the server goes down automatically."

More Amazon CloudFront Cons →

"They should improve the registration gateway. Currently, you can't do a pre-event registration that's straightforward. You have to do an API to integrate. It would be a lot easier if they had that."

More IBM Cloud Video Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Its price is really on the high side. It should be cheaper in general."
  • "Amazon's pricing varies depending on the data transfer."
  • "I rate Amazon CloudFront's pricing a five out of ten."
  • "The product could improve its price."
  • "Amazon CloudFront is an expensive solution."
  • "The solution’s price is reasonable."
  • "Amazon CloudFront costs less than third-party services."
  • "For CloudFront, I'm quite satisfied with the pricing. Initially, it doesn't require many resources for this specific solution."
  • More Amazon CloudFront Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CDN solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon’s Web Service Global Accelerator or Amazon CloudFront global content delivery network was the better fit for us. We decided to go with… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has good security features.
    Top Answer:I used to work with AWS and Azure, and we provided cost comparisons for customers to help them choose the right services. Azure tends to be more user-friendly and easier to understand, while AWS may… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 34 in CDN
    Views
    6,137
    Comparisons
    5,362
    Reviews
    18
    Average Words per Review
    378
    Rating
    8.0
    29th
    out of 34 in CDN
    Views
    85
    Comparisons
    51
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Ustream
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon CloudFront is a global content delivery network (CDN) service that accelerates delivery of your websites, APIs, video content or other web assets. It integrates with other Amazon Web Services products to give developers and businesses an easy way to accelerate content to end users with no minimum usage commitments. Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance. Amazon CloudFront is optimized to work with other Amazon Web Services, like Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), Amazon Elastic Load Balancing, and Amazon Route 53. Amazon CloudFront also works seamlessly with any non-AWS origin server, which stores the original, definitive versions of your files. Like other Amazon Web Services products, there are no long-term contracts or minimum monthly usage commitments for using Amazon CloudFront – you pay only for as much or as little content as you actually deliver through the content delivery service.

    With cognitive and AI infused technologies, IBM Cloud Video empowers customers to enhance live and on-demand video opportunities, and maximize viewer engagement.
    Sample Customers
    Unilever, Spotify, Pinterest, MLB Advanced Media, Foursquare, PBS, Airbnb, Netflix, WIX, Comcast, Automobili Lamborghini, Rovio, Discovery Communications
    Airbnb, N3 Results, University of Notre Dame
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Integrator8%
    Retailer8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization20%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise28%
    Large Enterprise55%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    CDN
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, Microsoft, Akamai and others in CDN. Updated: April 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon CloudFront is ranked 4th in CDN with 22 reviews while IBM Cloud Video is ranked 29th in CDN. Amazon CloudFront is rated 8.2, while IBM Cloud Video is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon CloudFront writes "Top-notch in terms of customer service and offers pay-as-you-go model with a free tier". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Cloud Video writes "Great user interface and easy to implement". Amazon CloudFront is most compared with Azure Front Door, Akamai, Cloudflare, Windows Azure CDN and Fastly, whereas IBM Cloud Video is most compared with .

    See our list of best CDN vendors.

    We monitor all CDN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.