Amazon EC2 vs Google App Engine comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
2,488 views|1,632 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Google Logo
3,673 views|3,140 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EC2 and Google App Engine based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service.
To learn more, read our detailed Compute Service Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product is very mature and organized.""The best features of Amazon EC2 are its high performance and security.""I use it for NextCloud and for developer purposes.""I like the AMI-related features. A very good feature of this solution is the customizable AMI. It is a very good feature provided by Amazon. The encryption technologies are also very good. We are using KMS, etc.""The product helps us with scalability. We also need not have data centers.""The greatest benefit of Amazon EC2 is its versatility, including the diverse range of servers available and the ability to connect to various resources.""There's a lot of encryption across the setups to ensure that database credentials and everything related to security are well managed.""The most valuable features are the scalability options, low maintenance, and options to upgrade. AWS support is also pretty good. The generation upgrade is pretty simple and standardized."

More Amazon EC2 Pros →

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward, considering that there is good documentation explaining the implementation part of it.""The solution is serverless, so we don't have to operate it.""Seurity features - unauthorized individuals are unable to access certain applications.""The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.""Administering App Engine is simple; it has intuitive UIs and a very scalable app engine.""Its ability to integrate with most devices helps users who have different or old devices.""Google App Engine's most valuable feature is self-management. You do not have to manage the infrastructure underneath where all the functions are happening, such as load balancing deployment and version management, they are managed by the system itself.""I've found that all of the features are valuable, especially the shared drive and the ability for multiple people to use their documents at the same time."

More Google App Engine Pros →

Cons
"Technical itself could be a bit more helpful, especially when it comes to integration assistance. When we talk to the technical team, often it's some issue with integration and they'll tell us to talk to the other company. Often, the other company will look at everything and not see an issue from their end and then we are at an impasse.""Lacks sufficient tools to help users minimize their costs.""They have to provide clarity on pricing. It's not transparent.""EC2 could be improved with easier migration.""Accessibility must be improved.""Support doesn't share or give insights on OS-based issues. That needs to improve because if someone is buying an EC2 instance with the Windows server and SQL license, the client expects that there will be a minimum level of support.""Currently in the autoscaling process if we have multiple issues we are not able to connect some of the VPC through the SMS.""The monitoring part could be improved. When we're building and configuring things or doing database replication, EC2's monitoring could provide more information. It's hard to find the information I need in the graphs they provide."

More Amazon EC2 Cons →

"I think there's still a lot that can be done with Google Meet and the video conferencing part of it. It could be more dynamic in terms of what can be done with it.""There needs to be more directions in terms of how to use the solution.""Difficult to assess how pricing is managed.""The support for the Indian region is not as good as compared to the support that is offered to the regions in Europe.""I am limited to sending a photo to five people. I want to be able to send a photo to many people, not just five.""The documentation and community are lacking for this product.""Some features of runtime don't work well in App Engine.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Google App Engine Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing appears to be cheap, however, it is extremely difficult in calculating what something will cost."
  • "It has helped to reduce costs with infrastructure."
  • "EC2 pricing is somewhat transparent, in that AWS provides pricing for all instance types. However, the number of pricing options can be confusing."
  • "For our usage, the cost is approximately $20,000 to $23,000 per month."
  • "There is a license required to use this solution and we pay on a monthly basis."
  • "The price is reasonable, but there is definitely an opportunity to lower it in instances which are of a higher configuration, because they have been typically used for the long term."
  • "Amazon EC2 has a pay-as-you-use cost model."
  • "The clients have found the billing of Amazon EC2 good, but the price could be less high. There is a monthly subscription to use the solution."
  • More Amazon EC2 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I would like to have more free application with it. Some of the applications, I am paying more for them. I think that they must be free."
  • "We pay the license yearly. It's about $6 a month, which is $72 a year per person, so it's about $500."
  • "If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price."
  • More Google App Engine Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Compute Service solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for alluring IT customers. This article give brief history of these cloud hosting service providers and compares the cloud services provided by them. -- Amazon Web Services -- It's hard to find someone who doesn't agree that Amazon Web Services is the market leader in IaaS cloud computing. The company has one of the widest breadths of cloud services - including compute, storage, networking, databases, load balancers, applications and application development platforms all delivered as a cloud service. Amazon has dropped its prices 21 times since it debuted its cloud six years ago and fairly consistently fills whatever gaps it has in the size of virtual machine instances on its platform - the company recently rolled out new high-memory instances, for example. There are some cautions for Amazon though. Namely, its cloud has experienced three major outages in two years. One analyst, Jillian Mirandi of Technology Business Researcher, has suggested that continued outages could eventually start hindering businesses' willingness to invest in Amazon infrastructure. That sentiment gets to a larger point about AWS though - the service seems to be popular in the startup community, providing the IT… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The scalability and elasticity are helpful.
    Top Answer:We pay a monthly subscription fee. The price can be improved.
    Top Answer:Accessibility must be improved. It is important to know how fast we can get to the solution. It would be nice if the interface would pop up without much loading. The product must be faster and more… more »
    Top Answer:The product's setup and deployment phases are easy.
    Top Answer:If we don't know how to work with the tool, we might have some spikes in price. It will increase a lot of our bill. I rate the pricing a six out of ten.
    Top Answer:The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Ranking
    3rd
    out of 16 in Compute Service
    Views
    2,488
    Comparisons
    1,632
    Reviews
    44
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    8.6
    12th
    out of 37 in PaaS Clouds
    Views
    3,673
    Comparisons
    3,140
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    650
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud, EC2
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale cloud computing easier for developers.

    Amazon EC2’s simple web service interface allows you to obtain and configure capacity with minimal friction. It provides you with complete control of your computing resources and lets you run on Amazon’s proven computing environment. Amazon EC2 reduces the time required to obtain and boot new server instances to minutes, allowing you to quickly scale capacity, both up and down, as your computing requirements change. Amazon EC2 changes the economics of computing by allowing you to pay only for capacity that you actually use. Amazon EC2 provides developers the tools to build failure resilient applications and isolate them from common failure scenarios.

    Google App Engine is a Platform-as-a-Service (Paas) provider that equips web application developers with all the resources and tools that they need to develop, test, and run their applications on Google's infrastructure. Everything is built into the kit, so with one download of the SDK, you'll be well on your way to first-rate apps.

    Sample Customers
    Netflix, Expedia, TimeInc., Novaris, airbnb, Lamborghini
    Khan Academy, Best Buy, Gigya, MetOffice, Getaround, Mimiboard, NewsLimited, WebFilings, and CloudLock.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company28%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company17%
    University7%
    Educational Organization6%
    REVIEWERS
    Media Company25%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Non Profit13%
    Educational Organization13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization16%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Media Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Compute Service
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Apache, Zadara and others in Compute Service. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EC2 is ranked 3rd in Compute Service with 60 reviews while Google App Engine is ranked 12th in PaaS Clouds with 23 reviews. Amazon EC2 is rated 8.6, while Google App Engine is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon EC2 writes "Easy to scale and valuable features include the security group and key management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google App Engine writes "Simplifies app development process for businesses". Amazon EC2 is most compared with AWS Fargate, Apache Spark, AWS Lambda, AWS Batch and Apache NiFi, whereas Google App Engine is most compared with Microsoft Azure, Amazon AWS, Heroku, IBM Cloud Private and Amazon Lightsail.

    We monitor all Compute Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.